Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care

Abstract Background Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a low value health care practice that does not benefit most patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM). This paper evaluates Re-Think the Strip (RTS), a multi-component study aimed at de-implementing SMBG among non-insulin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katrina E. Donahue, Marcella H. Boynton, Jennifer Leeman, Jennifer Rees, Erica Richman, Kathleen Mottus, Lisa P. Spees, Maihan B. Vu, April B. Reese, Hazel Tapp, Adam Lee, Asia Johnson, Rebecca J. Cleveland, Laura A. Young
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-04-01
Series:BMC Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02781-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850258477216169984
author Katrina E. Donahue
Marcella H. Boynton
Jennifer Leeman
Jennifer Rees
Erica Richman
Kathleen Mottus
Lisa P. Spees
Maihan B. Vu
April B. Reese
Hazel Tapp
Adam Lee
Asia Johnson
Rebecca J. Cleveland
Laura A. Young
author_facet Katrina E. Donahue
Marcella H. Boynton
Jennifer Leeman
Jennifer Rees
Erica Richman
Kathleen Mottus
Lisa P. Spees
Maihan B. Vu
April B. Reese
Hazel Tapp
Adam Lee
Asia Johnson
Rebecca J. Cleveland
Laura A. Young
author_sort Katrina E. Donahue
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a low value health care practice that does not benefit most patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM). This paper evaluates Re-Think the Strip (RTS), a multi-component study aimed at de-implementing SMBG among non-insulin treated T2DM patients in primary care. Methods This study used a pre-post design to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Re-Think the Strip in 20 primary care clinics with a comparison group of 34 clinics within one health system. De-implementation strategies were implemented over 12 months and practices were followed for 18 months. Results There was an overall decrease in the odds of receiving a prescription for diabetes testing supplies (i.e., test strips and/or lancets) between the baseline and 12-month intervention follow-up for intervention and comparison clinics (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.98). However, there was no statistically significant difference in prescribing between the intervention and comparison clinics. In sensitivity analyses, a small intervention effect was observed for those patients newly diagnosed with T2DM or newly assigned to a study clinic (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 1.00). Conclusions De-implementation strategies are feasible in primary care practices. Although prescriptions for SMBG decreased in intervention practices, they also decreased in the comparison practices. Newly diagnosed patients or new patients may be more receptive to de-implementation. Other factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic and baseline prescribing rates may have limited the effectiveness of the RTS de-implementation strategy.
format Article
id doaj-art-a0c99d47c9a44904adc216fbb074cfa5
institution OA Journals
issn 2731-4553
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Primary Care
spelling doaj-art-a0c99d47c9a44904adc216fbb074cfa52025-08-20T01:56:09ZengBMCBMC Primary Care2731-45532025-04-0126111010.1186/s12875-025-02781-6Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary careKatrina E. Donahue0Marcella H. Boynton1Jennifer Leeman2Jennifer Rees3Erica Richman4Kathleen Mottus5Lisa P. Spees6Maihan B. Vu7April B. Reese8Hazel Tapp9Adam Lee10Asia Johnson11Rebecca J. Cleveland12Laura A. Young13Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Medicine & Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDiabetes Team, National Association of Chronic Disease DirectorsDepartment of Family Medicine, Atrium HealthNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillCooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Veteran Affairs Health Care SystemDivision of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillAbstract Background Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a low value health care practice that does not benefit most patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM). This paper evaluates Re-Think the Strip (RTS), a multi-component study aimed at de-implementing SMBG among non-insulin treated T2DM patients in primary care. Methods This study used a pre-post design to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of Re-Think the Strip in 20 primary care clinics with a comparison group of 34 clinics within one health system. De-implementation strategies were implemented over 12 months and practices were followed for 18 months. Results There was an overall decrease in the odds of receiving a prescription for diabetes testing supplies (i.e., test strips and/or lancets) between the baseline and 12-month intervention follow-up for intervention and comparison clinics (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94, 0.98). However, there was no statistically significant difference in prescribing between the intervention and comparison clinics. In sensitivity analyses, a small intervention effect was observed for those patients newly diagnosed with T2DM or newly assigned to a study clinic (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 1.00). Conclusions De-implementation strategies are feasible in primary care practices. Although prescriptions for SMBG decreased in intervention practices, they also decreased in the comparison practices. Newly diagnosed patients or new patients may be more receptive to de-implementation. Other factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic and baseline prescribing rates may have limited the effectiveness of the RTS de-implementation strategy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02781-6Practice-based researchDe-implementationGlucose monitoringImplementation and disseminationDiabetes
spellingShingle Katrina E. Donahue
Marcella H. Boynton
Jennifer Leeman
Jennifer Rees
Erica Richman
Kathleen Mottus
Lisa P. Spees
Maihan B. Vu
April B. Reese
Hazel Tapp
Adam Lee
Asia Johnson
Rebecca J. Cleveland
Laura A. Young
Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
BMC Primary Care
Practice-based research
De-implementation
Glucose monitoring
Implementation and dissemination
Diabetes
title Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
title_full Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
title_fullStr Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
title_short Re-Think the Strip: de-implementing a low value practice in primary care
title_sort re think the strip de implementing a low value practice in primary care
topic Practice-based research
De-implementation
Glucose monitoring
Implementation and dissemination
Diabetes
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02781-6
work_keys_str_mv AT katrinaedonahue rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT marcellahboynton rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT jenniferleeman rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT jenniferrees rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT ericarichman rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT kathleenmottus rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT lisapspees rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT maihanbvu rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT aprilbreese rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT hazeltapp rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT adamlee rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT asiajohnson rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT rebeccajcleveland rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare
AT lauraayoung rethinkthestripdeimplementingalowvaluepracticeinprimarycare