Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts

Background Basilar artery occlusion is associated with high rates of disability and mortality, and despite advances in endovascular treatment, futile recanalization remains a challenge. This study aims to identify predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion, focusin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pan Zhang, Miaomiao Hu, Yingjie Xu, Jinghui Zhong, Xinfeng Liu, Wen Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.039941
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849734322060263424
author Pan Zhang
Miaomiao Hu
Yingjie Xu
Jinghui Zhong
Xinfeng Liu
Wen Sun
author_facet Pan Zhang
Miaomiao Hu
Yingjie Xu
Jinghui Zhong
Xinfeng Liu
Wen Sun
author_sort Pan Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Background Basilar artery occlusion is associated with high rates of disability and mortality, and despite advances in endovascular treatment, futile recanalization remains a challenge. This study aims to identify predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion, focusing on large and nonlarge infarcts. Methods and Results This multicenter retrospective study included patients from 65 centers across China. Patients were categorized based on posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (pc‐ASPECTS) into 2 groups: large infarcts (pc‐ASPECTS ≤6) and nonlarge infarcts (pc‐ASPECTS >6). Predictors of futile recanalization—defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 4 to 6 at 90 days despite successful recanalization—were analyzed using logistic regression models. Among the 2075 patients, 1113 (53.6%) experienced futile recanalization. In patients with pc‐ASPECTS >6, predictors of futile recanalization included older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.06–1.31]), higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.58–1.94]), and prolonged time from puncture to reperfusion (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, [1.12–1.38]). Intravenous thrombolysis (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, [0.77–0.94]) and achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 3 (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, [0.74–0.90]) were associated with a lower likelihood of futile recanalization. In patients with pc‐ASPECTS ≤6, being male (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58–0.96]) and having higher pc‐ASPECTS scores (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48–0.85]) were protective against futile recanalization, whereas higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores increased the risk (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.42–2.32]). Conclusions This study identifies distinct predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion based on infarct size. The findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies and timely intervention to optimize endovascular treatment outcomes in high‐risk patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-a06e7dd483e942dda5ec6e07f333879d
institution DOAJ
issn 2047-9980
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj-art-a06e7dd483e942dda5ec6e07f333879d2025-08-20T03:07:50ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802025-05-01141010.1161/JAHA.124.039941Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge InfarctsPan Zhang0Miaomiao Hu1Yingjie Xu2Jinghui Zhong3Xinfeng Liu4Wen Sun5Department of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaDepartment of Neurology, Centre for Leading Medicine and Advanced Technologies of IHM, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui ChinaBackground Basilar artery occlusion is associated with high rates of disability and mortality, and despite advances in endovascular treatment, futile recanalization remains a challenge. This study aims to identify predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion, focusing on large and nonlarge infarcts. Methods and Results This multicenter retrospective study included patients from 65 centers across China. Patients were categorized based on posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT [Computed Tomography] Score (pc‐ASPECTS) into 2 groups: large infarcts (pc‐ASPECTS ≤6) and nonlarge infarcts (pc‐ASPECTS >6). Predictors of futile recanalization—defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 4 to 6 at 90 days despite successful recanalization—were analyzed using logistic regression models. Among the 2075 patients, 1113 (53.6%) experienced futile recanalization. In patients with pc‐ASPECTS >6, predictors of futile recanalization included older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.06–1.31]), higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.58–1.94]), and prolonged time from puncture to reperfusion (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, [1.12–1.38]). Intravenous thrombolysis (OR, 0.85 [95% CI, [0.77–0.94]) and achieving modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 3 (OR, 0.81 [95% CI, [0.74–0.90]) were associated with a lower likelihood of futile recanalization. In patients with pc‐ASPECTS ≤6, being male (OR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.58–0.96]) and having higher pc‐ASPECTS scores (OR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.48–0.85]) were protective against futile recanalization, whereas higher National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores increased the risk (OR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.42–2.32]). Conclusions This study identifies distinct predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion based on infarct size. The findings underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies and timely intervention to optimize endovascular treatment outcomes in high‐risk patients.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.039941endovascular treatmentfutile recanalizationlarge infarct corestroke
spellingShingle Pan Zhang
Miaomiao Hu
Yingjie Xu
Jinghui Zhong
Xinfeng Liu
Wen Sun
Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
endovascular treatment
futile recanalization
large infarct core
stroke
title Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
title_full Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
title_fullStr Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
title_full_unstemmed Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
title_short Predictors of Futile Recanalization in Patients With Basilar Artery Occlusion With Large Versus Nonlarge Infarcts
title_sort predictors of futile recanalization in patients with basilar artery occlusion with large versus nonlarge infarcts
topic endovascular treatment
futile recanalization
large infarct core
stroke
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.124.039941
work_keys_str_mv AT panzhang predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts
AT miaomiaohu predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts
AT yingjiexu predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts
AT jinghuizhong predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts
AT xinfengliu predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts
AT wensun predictorsoffutilerecanalizationinpatientswithbasilararteryocclusionwithlargeversusnonlargeinfarcts