Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether preoperative or postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with a new cut-off value is more optimal for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer, and to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative adjuv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryoichi Tsukamoto, Kiichi Sugimoto, Yuki Ii, Takahiro Irie, Megumi Kawaguchi, Aya Kobari, Yuki Tsuchiya, Kumpei Honjo, Masaya Kawai, Shun Ishiyama, Makoto Takahashi, Kazuhiro Sakamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Japan Society of Coloproctology 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-035/_pdf/-char/en
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832584947217465344
author Ryoichi Tsukamoto
Kiichi Sugimoto
Yuki Ii
Takahiro Irie
Megumi Kawaguchi
Aya Kobari
Yuki Tsuchiya
Kumpei Honjo
Masaya Kawai
Shun Ishiyama
Makoto Takahashi
Kazuhiro Sakamoto
author_facet Ryoichi Tsukamoto
Kiichi Sugimoto
Yuki Ii
Takahiro Irie
Megumi Kawaguchi
Aya Kobari
Yuki Tsuchiya
Kumpei Honjo
Masaya Kawai
Shun Ishiyama
Makoto Takahashi
Kazuhiro Sakamoto
author_sort Ryoichi Tsukamoto
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether preoperative or postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with a new cut-off value is more optimal for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer, and to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) based on the CEA values. Methods: Serum CEA levels were measured preoperatively (pre-CEA) and postoperatively (post-CEA). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to determine a cut-off for CEA. The cut-off for CEA relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) was established as that giving the highest AUROC. In comparison of superiority between pre- and post- CEA levels, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used in the Cox proportional-hazard regression model. Results: The subjects were 323 patients who underwent curative surgical treatment for Stage II/III rectal cancer. AIC values indicated that RFS was better stratified by a post-CEA level with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml compared with other classifications of pre- or post- CEA. In Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases, there was no effect of POAC on RFS in those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml (p=0.39), but in those with post-CEA 2.3 ng/ml there was a trend for better RFS in patients who received POAC compared to those without POAC (p=0.06). Conclusions: Patients with post-CEA 2.3 ng/ml had worse long-term outcomes compared with those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml. Post-CEA with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml may be useful in determining the indication for POAC for in Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases.
format Article
id doaj-art-9fb623d42f4345d8a42ec142da431871
institution Kabale University
issn 2432-3853
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher The Japan Society of Coloproctology
record_format Article
series Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
spelling doaj-art-9fb623d42f4345d8a42ec142da4318712025-01-27T10:02:40ZengThe Japan Society of ColoproctologyJournal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon2432-38532025-01-0191697810.23922/jarc.2024-0352024-035Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal CancerRyoichi Tsukamoto0Kiichi Sugimoto1Yuki Ii2Takahiro Irie3Megumi Kawaguchi4Aya Kobari5Yuki Tsuchiya6Kumpei Honjo7Masaya Kawai8Shun Ishiyama9Makoto Takahashi10Kazuhiro Sakamoto11Department of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery, Juntendo University Faculty of MedicineObjectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether preoperative or postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with a new cut-off value is more optimal for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer, and to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) based on the CEA values. Methods: Serum CEA levels were measured preoperatively (pre-CEA) and postoperatively (post-CEA). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to determine a cut-off for CEA. The cut-off for CEA relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) was established as that giving the highest AUROC. In comparison of superiority between pre- and post- CEA levels, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used in the Cox proportional-hazard regression model. Results: The subjects were 323 patients who underwent curative surgical treatment for Stage II/III rectal cancer. AIC values indicated that RFS was better stratified by a post-CEA level with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml compared with other classifications of pre- or post- CEA. In Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases, there was no effect of POAC on RFS in those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml (p=0.39), but in those with post-CEA 2.3 ng/ml there was a trend for better RFS in patients who received POAC compared to those without POAC (p=0.06). Conclusions: Patients with post-CEA 2.3 ng/ml had worse long-term outcomes compared with those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml. Post-CEA with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml may be useful in determining the indication for POAC for in Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-035/_pdf/-char/enlocally advanced rectal cancercarcinoembryonic antigen (cea)minimal residual disease (mrd)recurrence-free survivalpostoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (poac)
spellingShingle Ryoichi Tsukamoto
Kiichi Sugimoto
Yuki Ii
Takahiro Irie
Megumi Kawaguchi
Aya Kobari
Yuki Tsuchiya
Kumpei Honjo
Masaya Kawai
Shun Ishiyama
Makoto Takahashi
Kazuhiro Sakamoto
Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon
locally advanced rectal cancer
carcinoembryonic antigen (cea)
minimal residual disease (mrd)
recurrence-free survival
postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (poac)
title Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_full Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_short Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
title_sort prognostic impact of the postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level after curative resection of locally advanced rectal cancer
topic locally advanced rectal cancer
carcinoembryonic antigen (cea)
minimal residual disease (mrd)
recurrence-free survival
postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (poac)
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jarc/9/1/9_2024-035/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoichitsukamoto prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kiichisugimoto prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT yukiii prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT takahiroirie prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT megumikawaguchi prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT ayakobari prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT yukitsuchiya prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kumpeihonjo prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT masayakawai prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT shunishiyama prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT makototakahashi prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kazuhirosakamoto prognosticimpactofthepostoperativecarcinoembryonicantigenlevelaftercurativeresectionoflocallyadvancedrectalcancer