Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs

ABSTRACT Background In today's post‐truth times, where personal feelings and beliefs have become increasingly important, determining what is accurate knowledge has become an important skill. This is especially important during uncertainty crises (e.g., epidemics and pandemics) because alternati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Gökalp, Servet Üztemur, Po‐Ching Huang, Aslı Kartol, Hsin‐Chi Tsai, Erkan Dinç, Mark D. Griffiths, Chung‐Ying Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70275
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582649514819584
author Ali Gökalp
Servet Üztemur
Po‐Ching Huang
Aslı Kartol
Hsin‐Chi Tsai
Erkan Dinç
Mark D. Griffiths
Chung‐Ying Lin
author_facet Ali Gökalp
Servet Üztemur
Po‐Ching Huang
Aslı Kartol
Hsin‐Chi Tsai
Erkan Dinç
Mark D. Griffiths
Chung‐Ying Lin
author_sort Ali Gökalp
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background In today's post‐truth times, where personal feelings and beliefs have become increasingly important, determining what is accurate knowledge has become an important skill. This is especially important during uncertainty crises (e.g., epidemics and pandemics) because alternative explanations other than scientific knowledge may be disseminated vigorously. Epistemic justification concerns how and in what way the truth of knowledge claims is justified and the criteria for knowledge to be true and/or a fact. Given this backdrop, the present study examined how individuals reacted to conspiracies in an uncertainty crisis (using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example). Aim The mediating role of epistemic justification was investigated regarding its relationship between COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted incorporating a multifactorial correlational design. Using convenience sampling, 690 participants (55.7% females, Mage = 32.24 years, SD = 9.75) from different regions of Türkiye completed an online survey via Google Forms. Results The results demonstrated a strong and statistically significant correlation between beliefs in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories and beliefs in COVID‐19 vaccination conspiracy theories. The mediating effects of justification by authority and personal justification were statistically significant between COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy theories. Conclusion Using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example, the present results indicated the complex relationships between conspiracy beliefs and epistemic justification. The present results indicate the importance of authorities in taking early action to provide scientific evidence and information to the public to avoid individuals believing false information.
format Article
id doaj-art-9f1b039491104b0f9046062358de64d0
institution Kabale University
issn 2162-3279
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj-art-9f1b039491104b0f9046062358de64d02025-01-29T13:36:39ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/brb3.70275Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy BeliefsAli Gökalp0Servet Üztemur1Po‐Ching Huang2Aslı Kartol3Hsin‐Chi Tsai4Erkan Dinç5Mark D. Griffiths6Chung‐Ying Lin7Department of Educational Sciences Gaziantep University Gaziantep TürkiyeDepartment of Turkish and Social Sciences Education, Faculty of Education Anadolu University Eskişehir TürkiyeSchool of Physical Therapy, Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine Chang Gung University Taoyuan TaiwanDepartment of Psychological Counseling and Guidance Trakya University Edirne TürkiyeDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine Tzu Chi University Hualien TaiwanDepartment of Primary Education, Faculty of Education Anadolu University Eskişehir TürkiyeInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department Nottingham Trent University Nottingham UKInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan TaiwanABSTRACT Background In today's post‐truth times, where personal feelings and beliefs have become increasingly important, determining what is accurate knowledge has become an important skill. This is especially important during uncertainty crises (e.g., epidemics and pandemics) because alternative explanations other than scientific knowledge may be disseminated vigorously. Epistemic justification concerns how and in what way the truth of knowledge claims is justified and the criteria for knowledge to be true and/or a fact. Given this backdrop, the present study examined how individuals reacted to conspiracies in an uncertainty crisis (using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example). Aim The mediating role of epistemic justification was investigated regarding its relationship between COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs. Methods A cross‐sectional study was conducted incorporating a multifactorial correlational design. Using convenience sampling, 690 participants (55.7% females, Mage = 32.24 years, SD = 9.75) from different regions of Türkiye completed an online survey via Google Forms. Results The results demonstrated a strong and statistically significant correlation between beliefs in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories and beliefs in COVID‐19 vaccination conspiracy theories. The mediating effects of justification by authority and personal justification were statistically significant between COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs and COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy theories. Conclusion Using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example, the present results indicated the complex relationships between conspiracy beliefs and epistemic justification. The present results indicate the importance of authorities in taking early action to provide scientific evidence and information to the public to avoid individuals believing false information.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70275COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefsCOVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy beliefsepistemic beliefsepistemic justificationjustification by authoritypersonal justification
spellingShingle Ali Gökalp
Servet Üztemur
Po‐Ching Huang
Aslı Kartol
Hsin‐Chi Tsai
Erkan Dinç
Mark D. Griffiths
Chung‐Ying Lin
Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
Brain and Behavior
COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs
COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs
epistemic beliefs
epistemic justification
justification by authority
personal justification
title Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
title_full Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
title_fullStr Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
title_full_unstemmed Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
title_short Pandemic or “Plandemic”?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID‐19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID‐19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs
title_sort pandemic or plandemic the mediating role of epistemic justification strategies in the relationship between covid 19 conspiracy beliefs and covid 19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs
topic COVID‐19 conspiracy beliefs
COVID‐19 vaccine conspiracy beliefs
epistemic beliefs
epistemic justification
justification by authority
personal justification
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70275
work_keys_str_mv AT aligokalp pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT servetuztemur pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT pochinghuang pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT aslıkartol pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT hsinchitsai pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT erkandinc pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT markdgriffiths pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs
AT chungyinglin pandemicorplandemicthemediatingroleofepistemicjustificationstrategiesintherelationshipbetweencovid19conspiracybeliefsandcovid19vaccineconspiracybeliefs