Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes
I build the core argument of this article on the premise that disability has a dual nature: it affords protections to people with disabilities while it can also be used as an artifact of marginalization; thus, creating justice paradoxes. For instance, disability’s potential to oppress tends to ta...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Revista Española de Pedagogía |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.revistadepedagogia.org/rep/vol83/iss290/5/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832098341572313088 |
|---|---|
| author | Alfredo J. Artiles |
| author_facet | Alfredo J. Artiles |
| author_sort | Alfredo J. Artiles |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | I build the core argument of this article on the premise that disability has a dual nature: it affords protections to people with disabilities while it can also be used as an artifact of marginalization; thus, creating justice paradoxes. For instance, disability’s potential to oppress tends to target already marginalized groups, such as racialized people and students from nondominant linguistic, socioeconomic or ethnic backgrounds. Thus, a concept available to safeguard vulnerable groups (i.e., disability) can be deployed to segregate or deny educational opportunities. The purpose of this article is to offer theoretical tools to dissect disability’s potential for harm and inspire alternatives to address equity paradoxes that may
emerge from this phenomenon. I focus on racial disparities in disability identification as a case in point to contextualize the presentation of theoretical tools. First, I contextualize my analysis with an overview of racial disparities in disability identification. Next, I outline three theoretical tools to advance a critical cultural-historical framework: (1) trace the fluidity of disability, (2) expose the color of knowledge and its implications, and (3) make visible the role of ideologies through a DefectCraft lens. I close with reflections for the next generation of scholarship. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9e69685293a845fe8ad5f387a53cc7e3 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0034-9461 2174-0909 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Española de Pedagogía |
| spelling | doaj-art-9e69685293a845fe8ad5f387a53cc7e32025-02-05T11:26:46ZengUniversidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)Revista Española de Pedagogía0034-94612174-09092025-01-018329052010.22550/2174-0909.4241Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxesAlfredo J. Artiles0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-0787Stanford UniversityI build the core argument of this article on the premise that disability has a dual nature: it affords protections to people with disabilities while it can also be used as an artifact of marginalization; thus, creating justice paradoxes. For instance, disability’s potential to oppress tends to target already marginalized groups, such as racialized people and students from nondominant linguistic, socioeconomic or ethnic backgrounds. Thus, a concept available to safeguard vulnerable groups (i.e., disability) can be deployed to segregate or deny educational opportunities. The purpose of this article is to offer theoretical tools to dissect disability’s potential for harm and inspire alternatives to address equity paradoxes that may emerge from this phenomenon. I focus on racial disparities in disability identification as a case in point to contextualize the presentation of theoretical tools. First, I contextualize my analysis with an overview of racial disparities in disability identification. Next, I outline three theoretical tools to advance a critical cultural-historical framework: (1) trace the fluidity of disability, (2) expose the color of knowledge and its implications, and (3) make visible the role of ideologies through a DefectCraft lens. I close with reflections for the next generation of scholarship.https://www.revistadepedagogia.org/rep/vol83/iss290/5/disabilityintersectionalitydifference |
| spellingShingle | Alfredo J. Artiles Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes Revista Española de Pedagogía disability intersectionality difference |
| title | Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| title_full | Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| title_fullStr | Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| title_short | Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| title_sort | taming the duality of disability critical cultural historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes |
| topic | disability intersectionality difference |
| url | https://www.revistadepedagogia.org/rep/vol83/iss290/5/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alfredojartiles tamingthedualityofdisabilitycriticalculturalhistoricaltoolstodisruptequityparadoxes |