Taming the duality of disability. Critical cultural-historical tools to disrupt equity paradoxes

I build the core argument of this article on the premise that disability has a dual nature: it affords protections to people with disabilities while it can also be used as an artifact of marginalization; thus, creating justice paradoxes. For instance, disability’s potential to oppress tends to ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Alfredo J. Artiles
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR) 2025-01-01
Series:Revista Española de Pedagogía
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.revistadepedagogia.org/rep/vol83/iss290/5/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:I build the core argument of this article on the premise that disability has a dual nature: it affords protections to people with disabilities while it can also be used as an artifact of marginalization; thus, creating justice paradoxes. For instance, disability’s potential to oppress tends to target already marginalized groups, such as racialized people and students from nondominant linguistic, socioeconomic or ethnic backgrounds. Thus, a concept available to safeguard vulnerable groups (i.e., disability) can be deployed to segregate or deny educational opportunities. The purpose of this article is to offer theoretical tools to dissect disability’s potential for harm and inspire alternatives to address equity paradoxes that may emerge from this phenomenon. I focus on racial disparities in disability identification as a case in point to contextualize the presentation of theoretical tools. First, I contextualize my analysis with an overview of racial disparities in disability identification. Next, I outline three theoretical tools to advance a critical cultural-historical framework: (1) trace the fluidity of disability, (2) expose the color of knowledge and its implications, and (3) make visible the role of ideologies through a DefectCraft lens. I close with reflections for the next generation of scholarship.
ISSN:0034-9461
2174-0909