Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes

The DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow-up at 6-months,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Webster, Douglas Scott, Madhav Menon, Dougal McClean, Seif El-Jack, Gerard Wilkins, Scott A. Harding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8876443
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557980193652736
author Mark Webster
Douglas Scott
Madhav Menon
Dougal McClean
Seif El-Jack
Gerard Wilkins
Scott A. Harding
author_facet Mark Webster
Douglas Scott
Madhav Menon
Dougal McClean
Seif El-Jack
Gerard Wilkins
Scott A. Harding
author_sort Mark Webster
collection DOAJ
description The DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow-up at 6-months, the time point when the bioadaptor starts to uncage. This prospective study enrolled 44 patients with up to two de novo lesions at seven centers in New Zealand treated with the DynamX Bioadaptor. Follow-up was planned out to 12-months. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were 6-month target lesion failure (TLF) and late lumen loss. Patients presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 49%. Lesions (n = 45) were 16.0 ± 6.7 mm long, and 2.81 ± 0.41 mm in diameter. Device and procedure success were 100%, and acute lumen gain was 1.93 ± 0.35 mm. At 6-months, median in-device late lumen loss was 0.09 mm (IQR:0.05–0.16). Measured by intravascular ultrasound, the vessel, lumen, and device area remained constant. By optical coherence tomography, 96.4% ± 5.9% of struts per lesion were covered. Out to 12-months, no TLF and no definite or probable device thrombosis were reported. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the safety and performance of the DynamX Bioadaptor with excellent 12-month clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes comparable to best-in-class drug-eluting stents (DES).
format Article
id doaj-art-9df60349298740c895725d7c317c3048
institution Kabale University
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-9df60349298740c895725d7c317c30482025-02-03T01:40:58ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832024-01-01202410.1155/2024/8876443Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging OutcomesMark Webster0Douglas Scott1Madhav Menon2Dougal McClean3Seif El-Jack4Gerard Wilkins5Scott A. Harding6Cardiac Investigation UnitDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyCardiology DepartmentCardiovascular UnitCardiology DepartmentCardiology DepartmentThe DynamX Bioadaptor is a novel implant with uncaging elements that disengage after polymer resorption and permits restoration of vessel function, thereby potentially reducing late adverse cardiac events. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this novel implant with imaging follow-up at 6-months, the time point when the bioadaptor starts to uncage. This prospective study enrolled 44 patients with up to two de novo lesions at seven centers in New Zealand treated with the DynamX Bioadaptor. Follow-up was planned out to 12-months. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were 6-month target lesion failure (TLF) and late lumen loss. Patients presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction in 49%. Lesions (n = 45) were 16.0 ± 6.7 mm long, and 2.81 ± 0.41 mm in diameter. Device and procedure success were 100%, and acute lumen gain was 1.93 ± 0.35 mm. At 6-months, median in-device late lumen loss was 0.09 mm (IQR:0.05–0.16). Measured by intravascular ultrasound, the vessel, lumen, and device area remained constant. By optical coherence tomography, 96.4% ± 5.9% of struts per lesion were covered. Out to 12-months, no TLF and no definite or probable device thrombosis were reported. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the safety and performance of the DynamX Bioadaptor with excellent 12-month clinical and 6-month imaging outcomes comparable to best-in-class drug-eluting stents (DES).http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8876443
spellingShingle Mark Webster
Douglas Scott
Madhav Menon
Dougal McClean
Seif El-Jack
Gerard Wilkins
Scott A. Harding
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
title_full Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
title_fullStr Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
title_short Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using the DynamX Sirolimus-Eluting Bioadaptor: 12-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes
title_sort percutaneous coronary intervention using the dynamx sirolimus eluting bioadaptor 12 month clinical and imaging outcomes
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8876443
work_keys_str_mv AT markwebster percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT douglasscott percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT madhavmenon percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT dougalmcclean percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT seifeljack percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT gerardwilkins percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes
AT scottaharding percutaneouscoronaryinterventionusingthedynamxsirolimuselutingbioadaptor12monthclinicalandimagingoutcomes