An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania

A survey of 715 Holstein dairy farms in Pennsylvania was used to construct demographics for the average Holstein dairy farm. The average Holstein dairy farm was composed of 69 lactating cows; 11 nonlactating, pregnant cows; 44 heifers; and 18 calves. Milk production averaged 27.3 kg (60.0 lb). Crop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James D. Ferguson, Zhengxia Dou, Charles F. Ramberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2001-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.277
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554723648995328
author James D. Ferguson
Zhengxia Dou
Charles F. Ramberg
author_facet James D. Ferguson
Zhengxia Dou
Charles F. Ramberg
author_sort James D. Ferguson
collection DOAJ
description A survey of 715 Holstein dairy farms in Pennsylvania was used to construct demographics for the average Holstein dairy farm. The average Holstein dairy farm was composed of 69 lactating cows; 11 nonlactating, pregnant cows; 44 heifers; and 18 calves. Milk production averaged 27.3 kg (60.0 lb). Crop area averaged 73.6 ha. Milk production, crop area and type, average county yields, and herd animal groups were used to construct a typical feeding program for these farms. Typical rations were constructed for six feeding groups (three milk production groups, one nonlactating group, two heifer groups) to meet milk production, pregnancy, and growth requirements. Rations were constructed based on three forage qualities (excellent, average, and poor) typically observed on Pennsylvania dairy farms. Data for animal description (milk production, body weight, growth, and pregnancy status) and ration components and amounts consumed for each animal group were input into the excretion model of the Dairy Nutrient Planner computer program (DNP). Excretion of fecal N and dry matter (DM), urinary N, and total P and K were produced for each animal group and used to assess potential volatile losses of N. Work at the Marshak Dairy, New Bolton Center, indicates the majority of urinary N is rapidly lost as ammonia from dairy facilities. Based on this observation, the losses of N as ammonia were estimated to be 4.63, 4.62, and 4.28�tonne/year for the farm with excellent, average, and poor quality forages, respectively. Volatile losses of N may be reduced most by controlling levels of urea in urine. Urinary N may be reduced through dietary manipulation of protein and carbohydrate sources. Conversion of urea to ammonia may be reduced by altering the pH of barn floors and gutters. Entrapment of ammonia may be accomplished by acidification of manure slurry. Atmospheric ammonia contributes to acid rain, eutrophication of estuaries and lakes, and particulate air pollution. Reduction of ammonia emissions from dairy barns can significantly reduce atmospheric pollution and improve air and water quality.
format Article
id doaj-art-9dc6fc61793e4deb9961b5690b093ca3
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2001-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-9dc6fc61793e4deb9961b5690b093ca32025-02-03T05:50:48ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2001-01-01134835510.1100/tsw.2001.277An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in PennsylvaniaJames D. Ferguson0Zhengxia Dou1Charles F. Ramberg2University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Animal Health and Productivity, Kennett Square 19348, USAUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Animal Health and Productivity, Kennett Square 19348, USAUniversity of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Center for Animal Health and Productivity, Kennett Square 19348, USAA survey of 715 Holstein dairy farms in Pennsylvania was used to construct demographics for the average Holstein dairy farm. The average Holstein dairy farm was composed of 69 lactating cows; 11 nonlactating, pregnant cows; 44 heifers; and 18 calves. Milk production averaged 27.3 kg (60.0 lb). Crop area averaged 73.6 ha. Milk production, crop area and type, average county yields, and herd animal groups were used to construct a typical feeding program for these farms. Typical rations were constructed for six feeding groups (three milk production groups, one nonlactating group, two heifer groups) to meet milk production, pregnancy, and growth requirements. Rations were constructed based on three forage qualities (excellent, average, and poor) typically observed on Pennsylvania dairy farms. Data for animal description (milk production, body weight, growth, and pregnancy status) and ration components and amounts consumed for each animal group were input into the excretion model of the Dairy Nutrient Planner computer program (DNP). Excretion of fecal N and dry matter (DM), urinary N, and total P and K were produced for each animal group and used to assess potential volatile losses of N. Work at the Marshak Dairy, New Bolton Center, indicates the majority of urinary N is rapidly lost as ammonia from dairy facilities. Based on this observation, the losses of N as ammonia were estimated to be 4.63, 4.62, and 4.28�tonne/year for the farm with excellent, average, and poor quality forages, respectively. Volatile losses of N may be reduced most by controlling levels of urea in urine. Urinary N may be reduced through dietary manipulation of protein and carbohydrate sources. Conversion of urea to ammonia may be reduced by altering the pH of barn floors and gutters. Entrapment of ammonia may be accomplished by acidification of manure slurry. Atmospheric ammonia contributes to acid rain, eutrophication of estuaries and lakes, and particulate air pollution. Reduction of ammonia emissions from dairy barns can significantly reduce atmospheric pollution and improve air and water quality.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.277
spellingShingle James D. Ferguson
Zhengxia Dou
Charles F. Ramberg
An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
The Scientific World Journal
title An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
title_full An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
title_fullStr An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
title_full_unstemmed An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
title_short An Assessment of Ammonia Emissions from Dairy Facilities in Pennsylvania
title_sort assessment of ammonia emissions from dairy facilities in pennsylvania
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2001.277
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesdferguson anassessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania
AT zhengxiadou anassessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania
AT charlesframberg anassessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania
AT jamesdferguson assessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania
AT zhengxiadou assessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania
AT charlesframberg assessmentofammoniaemissionsfromdairyfacilitiesinpennsylvania