A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Aims: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have both been shown to be effective treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Many studies have compared the outcomes of the two treatments, but less so with the use of robotics, or individualized TKA alignment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan R. Manara, Macdaniel Nixon, Beth Tippett, Wil Pretty, Dermot Collopy, Gavin W. Clark
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2024-12-01
Series:Bone & Joint Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0086.R2
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583800732778496
author Jonathan R. Manara
Macdaniel Nixon
Beth Tippett
Wil Pretty
Dermot Collopy
Gavin W. Clark
author_facet Jonathan R. Manara
Macdaniel Nixon
Beth Tippett
Wil Pretty
Dermot Collopy
Gavin W. Clark
author_sort Jonathan R. Manara
collection DOAJ
description Aims: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have both been shown to be effective treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Many studies have compared the outcomes of the two treatments, but less so with the use of robotics, or individualized TKA alignment techniques. Functional alignment (FA) is a novel technique for performing a TKA and shares many principles with UKA. Our aim was to compare outcomes from a case-matched series of robotic-assisted UKAs and robotic-assisted TKAs performed using FA. Methods: From a prospectively collected database between April 2015 and December 2019, patients who underwent a robotic-assisted medial UKA (RA-UKA) were case-matched with patients who had undergone a FA robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) during the same time period. Patients were matched for preoperative BMI, sex, age, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). A total of 101 matched pairs were eligible for final review. Postoperatively the groups were then compared for differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), ability to ascend and descend stairs, and ability to kneel. Results: Both groups had significant improvements in mean FJS (65.1 points in the TKA group and 65.3 points in the UKA group) and mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (20 points in the TKA group and 18.2 in the UKA group) two years following surgery. The UKA group had superior outcomes at three months in the OKS and at one year in ROM (5°), ability to kneel (0.5 points on OKS question), and ascend (1.3 points on OKS question) and descend stairs (0.8 points on OKS question), but these were not greater than the minimal clinically important difference. There were no differences seen in FJS or OKS at one year postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 24 months in all the variables assessed. Conclusion: FA-RATKA and RA-UKA are both successful treatments for medial compartmental knee arthritis in this study. The UKA group showed a quicker recovery, but this study demonstrated equivalent two-year outcomes in all outcomes measured including stair ascent and descent, and kneeling. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1123–1129.
format Article
id doaj-art-9da88c491be94666a940e64b73c201f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2633-1462
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format Article
series Bone & Joint Open
spelling doaj-art-9da88c491be94666a940e64b73c201f42025-01-28T05:38:30ZengThe British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint SurgeryBone & Joint Open2633-14622024-12-015121123112910.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0086.R2A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplastyJonathan R. Manara0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6863-2042Macdaniel Nixon1Beth Tippett2Wil Pretty3Dermot Collopy4Gavin W. Clark5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3967-1613St John of God Healthcare, Perth, AustraliaSt John of God Healthcare, Perth, AustraliaPerth Hip & Knee, Perth, AustraliaPerth Hip & Knee, Perth, AustraliaSt John of God Healthcare, Perth, AustraliaSt John of God Healthcare, Perth, AustraliaAims: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have both been shown to be effective treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Many studies have compared the outcomes of the two treatments, but less so with the use of robotics, or individualized TKA alignment techniques. Functional alignment (FA) is a novel technique for performing a TKA and shares many principles with UKA. Our aim was to compare outcomes from a case-matched series of robotic-assisted UKAs and robotic-assisted TKAs performed using FA. Methods: From a prospectively collected database between April 2015 and December 2019, patients who underwent a robotic-assisted medial UKA (RA-UKA) were case-matched with patients who had undergone a FA robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) during the same time period. Patients were matched for preoperative BMI, sex, age, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). A total of 101 matched pairs were eligible for final review. Postoperatively the groups were then compared for differences in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), ability to ascend and descend stairs, and ability to kneel. Results: Both groups had significant improvements in mean FJS (65.1 points in the TKA group and 65.3 points in the UKA group) and mean Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (20 points in the TKA group and 18.2 in the UKA group) two years following surgery. The UKA group had superior outcomes at three months in the OKS and at one year in ROM (5°), ability to kneel (0.5 points on OKS question), and ascend (1.3 points on OKS question) and descend stairs (0.8 points on OKS question), but these were not greater than the minimal clinically important difference. There were no differences seen in FJS or OKS at one year postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at 24 months in all the variables assessed. Conclusion: FA-RATKA and RA-UKA are both successful treatments for medial compartmental knee arthritis in this study. The UKA group showed a quicker recovery, but this study demonstrated equivalent two-year outcomes in all outcomes measured including stair ascent and descent, and kneeling. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1123–1129.https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0086.R2roboticsarthroplastyfunctional alignmentpartial knee arthroplastyunicompartmental knee arthroplastytotal knee arthroplastyfunctional outcomestotal knee arthroplasty (tka)unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (uka)forgotten joint score (fjs)knee arthroplastyoxford knee scorepatient-reported outcome measures (proms)bmirobotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplastyrobotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
spellingShingle Jonathan R. Manara
Macdaniel Nixon
Beth Tippett
Wil Pretty
Dermot Collopy
Gavin W. Clark
A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
Bone & Joint Open
robotics
arthroplasty
functional alignment
partial knee arthroplasty
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
functional outcomes
total knee arthroplasty (tka)
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (uka)
forgotten joint score (fjs)
knee arthroplasty
oxford knee score
patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
bmi
robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title_full A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title_fullStr A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title_short A case-matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
title_sort case matched series comparing functional outcomes for robotic assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus functionally aligned robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty
topic robotics
arthroplasty
functional alignment
partial knee arthroplasty
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
total knee arthroplasty
functional outcomes
total knee arthroplasty (tka)
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (uka)
forgotten joint score (fjs)
knee arthroplasty
oxford knee score
patient-reported outcome measures (proms)
bmi
robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
url https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/epdf/10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0086.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanrmanara acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT macdanielnixon acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT bethtippett acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT wilpretty acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT dermotcollopy acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT gavinwclark acasematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT jonathanrmanara casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT macdanielnixon casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT bethtippett casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT wilpretty casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT dermotcollopy casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty
AT gavinwclark casematchedseriescomparingfunctionaloutcomesforroboticassistedunicompartmentalkneearthroplastyversusfunctionallyalignedroboticassistedtotalkneearthroplasty