Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings
The relevance and importance of this research is due to the fact that scientific and technological progress and rapid development of information technology in all spheres of public life have significantly influenced the emergence of new types of criminal offences. Criminals are using computer system...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | Law and Safety |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/800 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832572959983665152 |
|---|---|
| author | I. O. Teslenko |
| author_facet | I. O. Teslenko |
| author_sort | I. O. Teslenko |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The relevance and importance of this research is due to the fact that scientific and technological progress and rapid development of information technology in all spheres of public life have significantly influenced the emergence of new types of criminal offences. Criminals are using computer systems and other portable devices to commit unlawful acts with increasing frequency. Today, many criminal offences are being committed with the help of information technology around the world, ranging from simple online fraud to the threat of a territorial act. Therefore, one of the ways to record (document) such illegal activities effectively is to obtain (collect) electronic evidence by law enforcement agencies in criminal proceedings. In this regard, the key role is played by evidence, which helps to form an evidence base that makes it possible to notify a person of suspicion, send an indictment to the court and make a final court decision on the guilt (innocence) of a person in committing a particular criminal offence. Achievement of this objective undoubtedly necessitates a specific legal procedure for seizure of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, which is not yet clearly defined in terms of its collection, leading to numerous cases of courts declaring such evidence inadmissible.
In the course of the scientific research, the author of the article analyses the views of scholars on the interpretation of the concept of electronic evidence; provides the legislative interpretation of this term (unlike the CPC of Ukraine, other procedural codes enshrine the concept of electronic evidence); studies the case law on the issue of electronic evidence being admissible/inadmissible; and identifies the main features of electronic evidence, etc.
Given the fact that the Russian Federation commits war crimes on the territory of Ukraine on a daily basis, the author states the need to collect and record evidence of such crimes from open sources, which will further ensure the prosecution of the perpetrators.
In the course of studying the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, the author applied general scientific and special scientific methods, in particular, dialectical, formal and logical, and comparative legal methods. The interrelated use of these methods allowed for a comprehensive study, where each of these methods was used at a certain stage of the examination of the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9d9dfe0430e84547a0556536a6a16660 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1727-1584 2617-2933 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Law and Safety |
| spelling | doaj-art-9d9dfe0430e84547a0556536a6a166602025-02-02T05:58:04ZengKharkiv National University of Internal AffairsLaw and Safety1727-15842617-29332024-03-0192118619310.32631/pb.2024.1.17800Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedingsI. O. Teslenko0Kharkiv National University of Internal AffairsThe relevance and importance of this research is due to the fact that scientific and technological progress and rapid development of information technology in all spheres of public life have significantly influenced the emergence of new types of criminal offences. Criminals are using computer systems and other portable devices to commit unlawful acts with increasing frequency. Today, many criminal offences are being committed with the help of information technology around the world, ranging from simple online fraud to the threat of a territorial act. Therefore, one of the ways to record (document) such illegal activities effectively is to obtain (collect) electronic evidence by law enforcement agencies in criminal proceedings. In this regard, the key role is played by evidence, which helps to form an evidence base that makes it possible to notify a person of suspicion, send an indictment to the court and make a final court decision on the guilt (innocence) of a person in committing a particular criminal offence. Achievement of this objective undoubtedly necessitates a specific legal procedure for seizure of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, which is not yet clearly defined in terms of its collection, leading to numerous cases of courts declaring such evidence inadmissible. In the course of the scientific research, the author of the article analyses the views of scholars on the interpretation of the concept of electronic evidence; provides the legislative interpretation of this term (unlike the CPC of Ukraine, other procedural codes enshrine the concept of electronic evidence); studies the case law on the issue of electronic evidence being admissible/inadmissible; and identifies the main features of electronic evidence, etc. Given the fact that the Russian Federation commits war crimes on the territory of Ukraine on a daily basis, the author states the need to collect and record evidence of such crimes from open sources, which will further ensure the prosecution of the perpetrators. In the course of studying the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, the author applied general scientific and special scientific methods, in particular, dialectical, formal and logical, and comparative legal methods. The interrelated use of these methods allowed for a comprehensive study, where each of these methods was used at a certain stage of the examination of the specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings.https://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/800process of proofobtaining (collecting) evidencesources of evidenceelectronic evidencedigitalisationcollecting evidence from open sources. |
| spellingShingle | I. O. Teslenko Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings Law and Safety process of proof obtaining (collecting) evidence sources of evidence electronic evidence digitalisation collecting evidence from open sources. |
| title | Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| title_full | Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| title_fullStr | Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| title_full_unstemmed | Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| title_short | Specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| title_sort | specific features of obtaining and using electronic evidence in criminal proceedings |
| topic | process of proof obtaining (collecting) evidence sources of evidence electronic evidence digitalisation collecting evidence from open sources. |
| url | https://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/800 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ioteslenko specificfeaturesofobtainingandusingelectronicevidenceincriminalproceedings |