« Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature

Conservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenneth R. Olwig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie 2014-12-01
Series:Revue d'ethnoécologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832095906406596608
author Kenneth R. Olwig
author_facet Kenneth R. Olwig
author_sort Kenneth R. Olwig
collection DOAJ
description Conservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its role in determining why certain landscapes, conceptualized as being « natural », are conserved. It argues that « used », as opposed to « virgin », landscapes have a particular appeal because they have been preserved from generation to generation as a form of common inheritance that individuals do not own, but « merely look after it for the next generation ». To illustrate the point it takes its point of departure in a highly successful watch advertisement that uses this phrase as its slogan.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d7e2edcb7c54242aa7f21029a871527
institution Kabale University
issn 2267-2419
language English
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Laboratoire Éco-anthropologie et Ethnobiologie
record_format Article
series Revue d'ethnoécologie
spelling doaj-art-9d7e2edcb7c54242aa7f21029a8715272025-02-05T16:24:56ZengLaboratoire Éco-anthropologie et EthnobiologieRevue d'ethnoécologie2267-24192014-12-01610.4000/ethnoecologie.1927« Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National NatureKenneth R. OlwigConservation, whether it be of landscape or nature, is necessarily rooted in human culture, because the perception of what is landscape, and what is nature, and why a given landscape or area of nature is important, is a human judgment. This article focuses on the cultural idea of heritage, and its role in determining why certain landscapes, conceptualized as being « natural », are conserved. It argues that « used », as opposed to « virgin », landscapes have a particular appeal because they have been preserved from generation to generation as a form of common inheritance that individuals do not own, but « merely look after it for the next generation ». To illustrate the point it takes its point of departure in a highly successful watch advertisement that uses this phrase as its slogan.https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927natureconservationheritagelandscapecommonspastoral
spellingShingle Kenneth R. Olwig
« Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
Revue d'ethnoécologie
nature
conservation
heritage
landscape
commons
pastoral
title « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
title_full « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
title_fullStr « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
title_full_unstemmed « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
title_short « Used » Landscape’s Cultural Heritage Contra « Virgin » National Nature
title_sort used landscape s cultural heritage contra virgin national nature
topic nature
conservation
heritage
landscape
commons
pastoral
url https://journals.openedition.org/ethnoecologie/1927
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethrolwig usedlandscapesculturalheritagecontravirginnationalnature