Does Memory Accessibility Affect How Much We Learn from Studying?

Two experiments were used to test the hypothesis that studying has a greater impact on learning when the information being studied is currently less accessible in memory. This hypothesis aligns with well-established findings like the spacing effect, but it is inconsistent with other evidence. Prior...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nate Kornell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Behavioral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/6/760
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two experiments were used to test the hypothesis that studying has a greater impact on learning when the information being studied is currently less accessible in memory. This hypothesis aligns with well-established findings like the spacing effect, but it is inconsistent with other evidence. Prior research has not directly tested the causal relationship between accessibility and learning. Two experiments were used to manipulate memory accessibility using semantic priming. The results indicated that differences in accessibility had no impact on learning. Retrieval difficulty and retrieval success also failed to influence learning. It is speculated that changes in accessibility that are specifically due to forgetting, rather than changes in accessibility per se, may have a causal impact on learning efficiency.
ISSN:2076-328X