Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Edizioni FS
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Health and Social Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832595557867061248 |
---|---|
author | Joshua T. CLARK Angela BURRELL Amber ARNOLD Travis W. SCHMITZ Lei ZHANG Daniel W. JONES Richard L. SUMMERS Whitney BONDURANT Vinayak K. NAHAR |
author_facet | Joshua T. CLARK Angela BURRELL Amber ARNOLD Travis W. SCHMITZ Lei ZHANG Daniel W. JONES Richard L. SUMMERS Whitney BONDURANT Vinayak K. NAHAR |
author_sort | Joshua T. CLARK |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by better understanding motivations for and barriers to academic research participation. A secondary objective was to gauge the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on clinical faculty and their research experiences.
Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, a quantitative questionnaire was distributed to 482 individuals across 18 of the academic medical center’s 23 School of Medicine departments. Data were analyzed to determine if research experiences differed based on research participation, gender, tenure status, early career investigator status, and faculty rank. In Phase II, qualitative in-person interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide.
Results: In total, 100 Phase I questionnaires were completed, 93 of which met study inclusion criteria. Sixteen Phase I participants opted-in to Phase II interviews, and 11 interviews were successfully completed. Results from Phases I and II indicated several important emerging themes, leading to the creation of three overarching study categories: barriers to clinical research, divide in research training and education, and the impact of COVID-19.
Discussion: Results indicated several important emerging themes related to clinical research experiences and perceptions at an academic medical center. These findings will provide leadership with important insight into the experiences and perceptions of clinical faculty and their research participation at the academic medical center, including their motivations for and barriers to research participation. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9d630d29347a47c4a18eda5d31b75abb |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2499-2240 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | Edizioni FS |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Health and Social Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-9d630d29347a47c4a18eda5d31b75abb2025-01-18T18:20:29ZengEdizioni FSJournal of Health and Social Sciences2499-22402023-09-018324926110.19204/2023/XPRN7Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center Joshua T. CLARKAngela BURRELLAmber ARNOLDTravis W. SCHMITZLei ZHANGDaniel W. JONESRichard L. SUMMERSWhitney BONDURANTVinayak K. NAHARIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by better understanding motivations for and barriers to academic research participation. A secondary objective was to gauge the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on clinical faculty and their research experiences. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, a quantitative questionnaire was distributed to 482 individuals across 18 of the academic medical center’s 23 School of Medicine departments. Data were analyzed to determine if research experiences differed based on research participation, gender, tenure status, early career investigator status, and faculty rank. In Phase II, qualitative in-person interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Results: In total, 100 Phase I questionnaires were completed, 93 of which met study inclusion criteria. Sixteen Phase I participants opted-in to Phase II interviews, and 11 interviews were successfully completed. Results from Phases I and II indicated several important emerging themes, leading to the creation of three overarching study categories: barriers to clinical research, divide in research training and education, and the impact of COVID-19. Discussion: Results indicated several important emerging themes related to clinical research experiences and perceptions at an academic medical center. These findings will provide leadership with important insight into the experiences and perceptions of clinical faculty and their research participation at the academic medical center, including their motivations for and barriers to research participation.https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdfclinical research participationphysician-scientistsclinical research barrierscovid-19explanatory sequential mixed methods studyrelease timeorganizational culture |
spellingShingle | Joshua T. CLARK Angela BURRELL Amber ARNOLD Travis W. SCHMITZ Lei ZHANG Daniel W. JONES Richard L. SUMMERS Whitney BONDURANT Vinayak K. NAHAR Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center Journal of Health and Social Sciences clinical research participation physician-scientists clinical research barriers covid-19 explanatory sequential mixed methods study release time organizational culture |
title | Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
title_full | Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
title_fullStr | Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
title_short | Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
title_sort | experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center |
topic | clinical research participation physician-scientists clinical research barriers covid-19 explanatory sequential mixed methods study release time organizational culture |
url | https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joshuatclark experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT angelaburrell experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT amberarnold experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT traviswschmitz experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT leizhang experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT danielwjones experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT richardlsummers experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT whitneybondurant experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter AT vinayakknahar experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter |