Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua T. CLARK, Angela BURRELL, Amber ARNOLD, Travis W. SCHMITZ, Lei ZHANG, Daniel W. JONES, Richard L. SUMMERS, Whitney BONDURANT, Vinayak K. NAHAR
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Edizioni FS 2023-09-01
Series:Journal of Health and Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595557867061248
author Joshua T. CLARK
Angela BURRELL
Amber ARNOLD
Travis W. SCHMITZ
Lei ZHANG
Daniel W. JONES
Richard L. SUMMERS
Whitney BONDURANT
Vinayak K. NAHAR
author_facet Joshua T. CLARK
Angela BURRELL
Amber ARNOLD
Travis W. SCHMITZ
Lei ZHANG
Daniel W. JONES
Richard L. SUMMERS
Whitney BONDURANT
Vinayak K. NAHAR
author_sort Joshua T. CLARK
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by better understanding motivations for and barriers to academic research participation. A secondary objective was to gauge the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on clinical faculty and their research experiences. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, a quantitative questionnaire was distributed to 482 individuals across 18 of the academic medical center’s 23 School of Medicine departments. Data were analyzed to determine if research experiences differed based on research participation, gender, tenure status, early career investigator status, and faculty rank. In Phase II, qualitative in-person interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Results: In total, 100 Phase I questionnaires were completed, 93 of which met study inclusion criteria. Sixteen Phase I participants opted-in to Phase II interviews, and 11 interviews were successfully completed. Results from Phases I and II indicated several important emerging themes, leading to the creation of three overarching study categories: barriers to clinical research, divide in research training and education, and the impact of COVID-19. Discussion: Results indicated several important emerging themes related to clinical research experiences and perceptions at an academic medical center. These findings will provide leadership with important insight into the experiences and perceptions of clinical faculty and their research participation at the academic medical center, including their motivations for and barriers to research participation.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d630d29347a47c4a18eda5d31b75abb
institution Kabale University
issn 2499-2240
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Edizioni FS
record_format Article
series Journal of Health and Social Sciences
spelling doaj-art-9d630d29347a47c4a18eda5d31b75abb2025-01-18T18:20:29ZengEdizioni FSJournal of Health and Social Sciences2499-22402023-09-018324926110.19204/2023/XPRN7Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center Joshua T. CLARKAngela BURRELLAmber ARNOLDTravis W. SCHMITZLei ZHANGDaniel W. JONESRichard L. SUMMERSWhitney BONDURANTVinayak K. NAHARIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to capture experiences and explore perceptions of clinical faculty research participation at an academic medical center in the southeastern United States to allow leadership to train, recruit, and retain faculty members and increase research production by better understanding motivations for and barriers to academic research participation. A secondary objective was to gauge the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on clinical faculty and their research experiences. Methods: This explanatory sequential mixed methods study was conducted in two phases. In Phase I, a quantitative questionnaire was distributed to 482 individuals across 18 of the academic medical center’s 23 School of Medicine departments. Data were analyzed to determine if research experiences differed based on research participation, gender, tenure status, early career investigator status, and faculty rank. In Phase II, qualitative in-person interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Results: In total, 100 Phase I questionnaires were completed, 93 of which met study inclusion criteria. Sixteen Phase I participants opted-in to Phase II interviews, and 11 interviews were successfully completed. Results from Phases I and II indicated several important emerging themes, leading to the creation of three overarching study categories: barriers to clinical research, divide in research training and education, and the impact of COVID-19. Discussion: Results indicated several important emerging themes related to clinical research experiences and perceptions at an academic medical center. These findings will provide leadership with important insight into the experiences and perceptions of clinical faculty and their research participation at the academic medical center, including their motivations for and barriers to research participation.https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdfclinical research participationphysician-scientistsclinical research barrierscovid-19explanatory sequential mixed methods studyrelease timeorganizational culture
spellingShingle Joshua T. CLARK
Angela BURRELL
Amber ARNOLD
Travis W. SCHMITZ
Lei ZHANG
Daniel W. JONES
Richard L. SUMMERS
Whitney BONDURANT
Vinayak K. NAHAR
Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
Journal of Health and Social Sciences
clinical research participation
physician-scientists
clinical research barriers
covid-19
explanatory sequential mixed methods study
release time
organizational culture
title Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
title_full Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
title_fullStr Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
title_full_unstemmed Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
title_short Experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
title_sort experiences and perceptions of clinical research participation at an academic medical center
topic clinical research participation
physician-scientists
clinical research barriers
covid-19
explanatory sequential mixed methods study
release time
organizational culture
url https://journalhss.com/wp-content/uploads/Clark-et-al-September_2023_249_261.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuatclark experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT angelaburrell experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT amberarnold experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT traviswschmitz experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT leizhang experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT danielwjones experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT richardlsummers experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT whitneybondurant experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT vinayakknahar experiencesandperceptionsofclinicalresearchparticipationatanacademicmedicalcenter