When must not is not forbidden

The present paper describes an empirical investigation into an English modal predicate with the auxiliary verb must, the negative particle not and the bare infinitive of the main verb. Typically, the negator not changes the meaning of must from obligation or strong recommendation to forbiddance. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Leszek Szymański
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2023-12-01
Series:LingBaW
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/17024
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592733270704128
author Leszek Szymański
author_facet Leszek Szymański
author_sort Leszek Szymański
collection DOAJ
description The present paper describes an empirical investigation into an English modal predicate with the auxiliary verb must, the negative particle not and the bare infinitive of the main verb. Typically, the negator not changes the meaning of must from obligation or strong recommendation to forbiddance. This, however, takes place only with the root flavor of must. Epistemic must does not interact with not in this way. The study uses authentic language samples retrieved from the online version of The Corpus of Contemporary American English. The analysis adapts the model of the semantic field of modal expressions developed by Kratzer (1991), and it attempts to find what lies behind the said lack of interaction between must and not. After a scrutiny of the conversational backgrounds influencing the studied modal meanings, the study found that the meaning expressed by a speaker with must not depends on whether the speaker evaluates the propositional circumstances directly or infers from them. Moreover, the study proposes patterns of must-not interfaces with regard to the modal flavor.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d2d1271cc1147229b98999bb045c389
institution Kabale University
issn 2450-5188
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series LingBaW
spelling doaj-art-9d2d1271cc1147229b98999bb045c3892025-01-21T05:13:39ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLingBaW2450-51882023-12-01910.31743/lingbaw.17024When must not is not forbiddenLeszek Szymański0University of Zielona Góra The present paper describes an empirical investigation into an English modal predicate with the auxiliary verb must, the negative particle not and the bare infinitive of the main verb. Typically, the negator not changes the meaning of must from obligation or strong recommendation to forbiddance. This, however, takes place only with the root flavor of must. Epistemic must does not interact with not in this way. The study uses authentic language samples retrieved from the online version of The Corpus of Contemporary American English. The analysis adapts the model of the semantic field of modal expressions developed by Kratzer (1991), and it attempts to find what lies behind the said lack of interaction between must and not. After a scrutiny of the conversational backgrounds influencing the studied modal meanings, the study found that the meaning expressed by a speaker with must not depends on whether the speaker evaluates the propositional circumstances directly or infers from them. Moreover, the study proposes patterns of must-not interfaces with regard to the modal flavor. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/17024modalitymodality-negation interfacessemantic field of modalityconversational backgroundspossible worlds
spellingShingle Leszek Szymański
When must not is not forbidden
LingBaW
modality
modality-negation interfaces
semantic field of modality
conversational backgrounds
possible worlds
title When must not is not forbidden
title_full When must not is not forbidden
title_fullStr When must not is not forbidden
title_full_unstemmed When must not is not forbidden
title_short When must not is not forbidden
title_sort when must not is not forbidden
topic modality
modality-negation interfaces
semantic field of modality
conversational backgrounds
possible worlds
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/17024
work_keys_str_mv AT leszekszymanski whenmustnotisnotforbidden