Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a pos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rachna Ram, Jasprit Singh, Eddie McCaig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Breast Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832554855890157568
author Rachna Ram
Jasprit Singh
Eddie McCaig
author_facet Rachna Ram
Jasprit Singh
Eddie McCaig
author_sort Rachna Ram
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a positive sentinel node. Method. A systematic review of the electronic databases Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials was carried out. Only randomised trials that had patients with positive sentinel node as the study sample were included in the meta-analysis using the reported hazard ratios with a fixed effect model. Results. Three randomised controlled trials and five retrospective studies were identified. The pooled effect for overall survival was HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.79, 1.19], and for disease free survival was HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.60, 1.14]. The reported rates for locoregional recurrence were similar in both groups. The surgical morbidity was found to be significantly more in patients who had underwent axillary dissection. Conclusion. Amongst patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel node, no further axillary dissection is necessary. For patients with macrometastasis in the sentinel node, it is reasonable to consider omitting axillary dissection to avoid the morbidity of the procedure.
format Article
id doaj-art-9d0dcd06af454c02a7c66d81007a00ea
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3170
2090-3189
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Breast Cancer
spelling doaj-art-9d0dcd06af454c02a7c66d81007a00ea2025-02-03T05:50:26ZengWileyInternational Journal of Breast Cancer2090-31702090-31892014-01-01201410.1155/2014/513780513780Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRachna Ram0Jasprit Singh1Eddie McCaig2Plastic Burns and Maxillofacial Unit, Hutt Valley DHB, Private Bag 31907, Lower Hutt 5010, New ZealandFiji National University College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Private Mail Bag, Brown Street, Suva, FijiColonial War Memorial Hospital, Private Mail Bag, Brown Street, Suva, FijiIntroduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a positive sentinel node. Method. A systematic review of the electronic databases Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials was carried out. Only randomised trials that had patients with positive sentinel node as the study sample were included in the meta-analysis using the reported hazard ratios with a fixed effect model. Results. Three randomised controlled trials and five retrospective studies were identified. The pooled effect for overall survival was HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.79, 1.19], and for disease free survival was HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.60, 1.14]. The reported rates for locoregional recurrence were similar in both groups. The surgical morbidity was found to be significantly more in patients who had underwent axillary dissection. Conclusion. Amongst patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel node, no further axillary dissection is necessary. For patients with macrometastasis in the sentinel node, it is reasonable to consider omitting axillary dissection to avoid the morbidity of the procedure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780
spellingShingle Rachna Ram
Jasprit Singh
Eddie McCaig
Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
International Journal of Breast Cancer
title Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort sentinel node biopsy alone versus completion axillary node dissection in node positive breast cancer systematic review and meta analysis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780
work_keys_str_mv AT rachnaram sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaspritsingh sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eddiemccaig sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis