Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Introduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a pos...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Breast Cancer |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832554855890157568 |
---|---|
author | Rachna Ram Jasprit Singh Eddie McCaig |
author_facet | Rachna Ram Jasprit Singh Eddie McCaig |
author_sort | Rachna Ram |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a positive sentinel node. Method. A systematic review of the electronic databases Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials was carried out. Only randomised trials that had patients with positive sentinel node as the study sample were included in the meta-analysis using the reported hazard ratios with a fixed effect model. Results. Three randomised controlled trials and five retrospective studies were identified. The pooled effect for overall survival was HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.79, 1.19], and for disease free survival was HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.60, 1.14]. The reported rates for locoregional recurrence were similar in both groups. The surgical morbidity was found to be significantly more in patients who had underwent axillary dissection. Conclusion. Amongst patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel node, no further axillary dissection is necessary. For patients with macrometastasis in the sentinel node, it is reasonable to consider omitting axillary dissection to avoid the morbidity of the procedure. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9d0dcd06af454c02a7c66d81007a00ea |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-3170 2090-3189 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Breast Cancer |
spelling | doaj-art-9d0dcd06af454c02a7c66d81007a00ea2025-02-03T05:50:26ZengWileyInternational Journal of Breast Cancer2090-31702090-31892014-01-01201410.1155/2014/513780513780Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRachna Ram0Jasprit Singh1Eddie McCaig2Plastic Burns and Maxillofacial Unit, Hutt Valley DHB, Private Bag 31907, Lower Hutt 5010, New ZealandFiji National University College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Private Mail Bag, Brown Street, Suva, FijiColonial War Memorial Hospital, Private Mail Bag, Brown Street, Suva, FijiIntroduction. There has been recent interest in validity of completion axillary node dissection after a positive sentinel node. This systematic review aims to ascertain if sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients who have a positive sentinel node. Method. A systematic review of the electronic databases Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials was carried out. Only randomised trials that had patients with positive sentinel node as the study sample were included in the meta-analysis using the reported hazard ratios with a fixed effect model. Results. Three randomised controlled trials and five retrospective studies were identified. The pooled effect for overall survival was HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.79, 1.19], and for disease free survival was HR 0.83, 95% CI [0.60, 1.14]. The reported rates for locoregional recurrence were similar in both groups. The surgical morbidity was found to be significantly more in patients who had underwent axillary dissection. Conclusion. Amongst patients with micrometastasis in the sentinel node, no further axillary dissection is necessary. For patients with macrometastasis in the sentinel node, it is reasonable to consider omitting axillary dissection to avoid the morbidity of the procedure.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780 |
spellingShingle | Rachna Ram Jasprit Singh Eddie McCaig Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis International Journal of Breast Cancer |
title | Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Sentinel Node Biopsy Alone versus Completion Axillary Node Dissection in Node Positive Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | sentinel node biopsy alone versus completion axillary node dissection in node positive breast cancer systematic review and meta analysis |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/513780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rachnaram sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jaspritsingh sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eddiemccaig sentinelnodebiopsyaloneversuscompletionaxillarynodedissectioninnodepositivebreastcancersystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |