Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease

BackgroundIn contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.MethodsWeb of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized contro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haohang Su, Shengwei Xiao, Zhiqing Liang, Tianrong Xun, Jinfang Zhang, Xixiao Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1475222/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591625253027840
author Haohang Su
Haohang Su
Shengwei Xiao
Zhiqing Liang
Zhiqing Liang
Tianrong Xun
Jinfang Zhang
Jinfang Zhang
Xixiao Yang
Xixiao Yang
author_facet Haohang Su
Haohang Su
Shengwei Xiao
Zhiqing Liang
Zhiqing Liang
Tianrong Xun
Jinfang Zhang
Jinfang Zhang
Xixiao Yang
Xixiao Yang
author_sort Haohang Su
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundIn contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.MethodsWeb of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance.ResultsWe identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission.ConclusionThis analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.
format Article
id doaj-art-9cffcd32642841d6ba5fd66fdf75887a
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-9cffcd32642841d6ba5fd66fdf75887a2025-01-22T08:42:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011510.3389/fphar.2024.14752221475222Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s diseaseHaohang Su0Haohang Su1Shengwei Xiao2Zhiqing Liang3Zhiqing Liang4Tianrong Xun5Jinfang Zhang6Jinfang Zhang7Xixiao Yang8Xixiao Yang9Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, ChinaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, ChinaSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, ChinaCancer Center, Shenzhen Hospital (Futian) of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, ChinaShenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Oncology Medical Center, Shenzhen, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, ChinaShenzhen Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease, Shenzhen, ChinaBackgroundIn contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.MethodsWeb of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance.ResultsWe identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission.ConclusionThis analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1475222/fullbayesian network meta-analysisCrohn’s diseasebiologic agentsefficacysafetyGRADE
spellingShingle Haohang Su
Haohang Su
Shengwei Xiao
Zhiqing Liang
Zhiqing Liang
Tianrong Xun
Jinfang Zhang
Jinfang Zhang
Xixiao Yang
Xixiao Yang
Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
Frontiers in Pharmacology
bayesian network meta-analysis
Crohn’s disease
biologic agents
efficacy
safety
GRADE
title Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
title_full Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
title_fullStr Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
title_short Systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis: comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease
title_sort systematic review and bayesian network meta analysis comparative efficacy and safety of six commonly used biologic therapies for moderate to severe crohn s disease
topic bayesian network meta-analysis
Crohn’s disease
biologic agents
efficacy
safety
GRADE
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1475222/full
work_keys_str_mv AT haohangsu systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT haohangsu systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT shengweixiao systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT zhiqingliang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT zhiqingliang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT tianrongxun systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT jinfangzhang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT jinfangzhang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT xixiaoyang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease
AT xixiaoyang systematicreviewandbayesiannetworkmetaanalysiscomparativeefficacyandsafetyofsixcommonlyusedbiologictherapiesformoderatetoseverecrohnsdisease