Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model

Purpose. To compare two platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation methods (double spin (D-PRP) and TriCell PRP (T-PRP)) for eye drops, concentration yields of platelets and other cells, release of growth factors, and efficacy of the de-epithelization rabbit model. Methods. PRP was extracted by D-PRP an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tatsuhiko Kobayashi, Takashi Suzuki, Tomohiko Saito, Takashi Itokawa, Yuichi Hori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6634744
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832563305349120000
author Tatsuhiko Kobayashi
Takashi Suzuki
Tomohiko Saito
Takashi Itokawa
Yuichi Hori
author_facet Tatsuhiko Kobayashi
Takashi Suzuki
Tomohiko Saito
Takashi Itokawa
Yuichi Hori
author_sort Tatsuhiko Kobayashi
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare two platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation methods (double spin (D-PRP) and TriCell PRP (T-PRP)) for eye drops, concentration yields of platelets and other cells, release of growth factors, and efficacy of the de-epithelization rabbit model. Methods. PRP was extracted by D-PRP and T-PRP from 30 ml blood from healthy adults. After extraction, platelets and leukocytes were counted. D-PRP and T-PRP were preserved during A: 1 h storage at room temperature, B: 1 h storage at −20°C, C: 24 h storage at 4°C, and D: 24 h storage at −20°C. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) was measured. Freezing/thawing PRP eye drops and control were instilled in the de-epithelization rabbit model four times per day for 5 days. Histology was compared between eyes treated with control, D-PRP, and T-PRP. Results. 14 ml of D-PRP and 4 ml of T-PRP were extracted from 30 ml whole blood samples. D-PRP and T-PRP had 41.36 ± 8.43 × 104 and 67.02 ± 13.55 × 104 platelets and 0.41 ± 0.24 × 103/ml and 10.09 ± 4.29 × 103/ml leucocytes, respectively. In the four storage methods, PDGF concentrations in T-PRP were higher than those in D-PRP eye drops. Freezing/thawing D-PRP and T-PRP increased PDGF concentrations. Histology showed corneal epithelium thickness in T-PRP-treated eyes after healing (38.41 ± 9.10 μm) was significantly higher than that in control-treated (27.77 ± 4.76 μm) and D-PRP-treated eyes (18.32 ± 3.14 μm) (P < 0.05). There was no corneal damage with inflammation in corneal stroma and epithelium of all tested groups. Electron microscopy revealed strong adhesion between cell junctions in T-PRP-treated eyes. Conclusions. Freezing/thawing of PRP extracted with the T-PRP kit may result in high platelet and leukocyte concentration and produce high PDGF concentration. PRP eye drops including leucocytes could increase thickness of corneal epithelium without corneal inflammation.
format Article
id doaj-art-9cb33caf5471467eba1dda52101e8806
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-9cb33caf5471467eba1dda52101e88062025-02-03T01:20:30ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582020-01-01202010.1155/2020/66347446634744Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit ModelTatsuhiko Kobayashi0Takashi Suzuki1Tomohiko Saito2Takashi Itokawa3Yuichi Hori4Department of Ophthalmology, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JapanPurpose. To compare two platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation methods (double spin (D-PRP) and TriCell PRP (T-PRP)) for eye drops, concentration yields of platelets and other cells, release of growth factors, and efficacy of the de-epithelization rabbit model. Methods. PRP was extracted by D-PRP and T-PRP from 30 ml blood from healthy adults. After extraction, platelets and leukocytes were counted. D-PRP and T-PRP were preserved during A: 1 h storage at room temperature, B: 1 h storage at −20°C, C: 24 h storage at 4°C, and D: 24 h storage at −20°C. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) was measured. Freezing/thawing PRP eye drops and control were instilled in the de-epithelization rabbit model four times per day for 5 days. Histology was compared between eyes treated with control, D-PRP, and T-PRP. Results. 14 ml of D-PRP and 4 ml of T-PRP were extracted from 30 ml whole blood samples. D-PRP and T-PRP had 41.36 ± 8.43 × 104 and 67.02 ± 13.55 × 104 platelets and 0.41 ± 0.24 × 103/ml and 10.09 ± 4.29 × 103/ml leucocytes, respectively. In the four storage methods, PDGF concentrations in T-PRP were higher than those in D-PRP eye drops. Freezing/thawing D-PRP and T-PRP increased PDGF concentrations. Histology showed corneal epithelium thickness in T-PRP-treated eyes after healing (38.41 ± 9.10 μm) was significantly higher than that in control-treated (27.77 ± 4.76 μm) and D-PRP-treated eyes (18.32 ± 3.14 μm) (P < 0.05). There was no corneal damage with inflammation in corneal stroma and epithelium of all tested groups. Electron microscopy revealed strong adhesion between cell junctions in T-PRP-treated eyes. Conclusions. Freezing/thawing of PRP extracted with the T-PRP kit may result in high platelet and leukocyte concentration and produce high PDGF concentration. PRP eye drops including leucocytes could increase thickness of corneal epithelium without corneal inflammation.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6634744
spellingShingle Tatsuhiko Kobayashi
Takashi Suzuki
Tomohiko Saito
Takashi Itokawa
Yuichi Hori
Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
title_full Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
title_short Comparison of Two Preparation Methods for Platelet-Rich Plasma Eye Drops for Release of Growth Factors and De-Epithelization Rabbit Model
title_sort comparison of two preparation methods for platelet rich plasma eye drops for release of growth factors and de epithelization rabbit model
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6634744
work_keys_str_mv AT tatsuhikokobayashi comparisonoftwopreparationmethodsforplateletrichplasmaeyedropsforreleaseofgrowthfactorsanddeepithelizationrabbitmodel
AT takashisuzuki comparisonoftwopreparationmethodsforplateletrichplasmaeyedropsforreleaseofgrowthfactorsanddeepithelizationrabbitmodel
AT tomohikosaito comparisonoftwopreparationmethodsforplateletrichplasmaeyedropsforreleaseofgrowthfactorsanddeepithelizationrabbitmodel
AT takashiitokawa comparisonoftwopreparationmethodsforplateletrichplasmaeyedropsforreleaseofgrowthfactorsanddeepithelizationrabbitmodel
AT yuichihori comparisonoftwopreparationmethodsforplateletrichplasmaeyedropsforreleaseofgrowthfactorsanddeepithelizationrabbitmodel