Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges

The results of testing the spectral-acoustic cavitometer with measurement modes that differ in the frequency ranges of integration of cavitation noise are presented. For each of the H1–H4 modes, the lower integration frequency  fmin is 1, 70, 180 and 300 kHz, respectively. The upper frequency is the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. S. Minchuk, A. Y. Perhunova, M. P. Fedorinchik, N. V. Dezhkunov
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Educational institution «Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics» 2024-06-01
Series:Doklady Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informatiki i radioèlektroniki
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doklady.bsuir.by/jour/article/view/3929
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849340615768145920
author V. S. Minchuk
A. Y. Perhunova
M. P. Fedorinchik
N. V. Dezhkunov
author_facet V. S. Minchuk
A. Y. Perhunova
M. P. Fedorinchik
N. V. Dezhkunov
author_sort V. S. Minchuk
collection DOAJ
description The results of testing the spectral-acoustic cavitometer with measurement modes that differ in the frequency ranges of integration of cavitation noise are presented. For each of the H1–H4 modes, the lower integration frequency  fmin is 1, 70, 180 and 300 kHz, respectively. The upper frequency is the same for all modes and  is   fmax  =  10  MHz. Piezoelectric waveguide sensors were used as a cavitation noise receivers. The distributions of cavitation activity in non-uniform ultrasonic fields were recorded: in the volume of the ultrasonic bath  (f0 = 35 kHz) and in the field of the submersible emitter (f0 = 21 kHz). The frequency range of integration was varied by changing the lower bound. It has been established that a change in the integration range within a fairly wide range does not have a noticeable qualitative effect on the result of measurements of cavitation activity, only a multiple change in the readings occurs. This conclusion was confirmed using sensors that differ in their spectral characteristics.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c6a8287f59349f189c920d5b0af29b0
institution Kabale University
issn 1729-7648
language Russian
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Educational institution «Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics»
record_format Article
series Doklady Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informatiki i radioèlektroniki
spelling doaj-art-9c6a8287f59349f189c920d5b0af29b02025-08-20T03:43:52ZrusEducational institution «Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics»Doklady Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informatiki i radioèlektroniki1729-76482024-06-01223364310.35596/1729-7648-2024-22-3-36-431990Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency RangesV. S. Minchuk0A. Y. Perhunova1M. P. Fedorinchik2N. V. Dezhkunov3Belarusian State University of Informatics and RadioelectronicsBelarusian State University of Informatics and RadioelectronicsBelarusian State University of Informatics and RadioelectronicsBelarusian State University of Informatics and RadioelectronicsThe results of testing the spectral-acoustic cavitometer with measurement modes that differ in the frequency ranges of integration of cavitation noise are presented. For each of the H1–H4 modes, the lower integration frequency  fmin is 1, 70, 180 and 300 kHz, respectively. The upper frequency is the same for all modes and  is   fmax  =  10  MHz. Piezoelectric waveguide sensors were used as a cavitation noise receivers. The distributions of cavitation activity in non-uniform ultrasonic fields were recorded: in the volume of the ultrasonic bath  (f0 = 35 kHz) and in the field of the submersible emitter (f0 = 21 kHz). The frequency range of integration was varied by changing the lower bound. It has been established that a change in the integration range within a fairly wide range does not have a noticeable qualitative effect on the result of measurements of cavitation activity, only a multiple change in the readings occurs. This conclusion was confirmed using sensors that differ in their spectral characteristics.https://doklady.bsuir.by/jour/article/view/3929cavitation activitycavitation noiseultrasoundcavitometerspectral-acoustic method
spellingShingle V. S. Minchuk
A. Y. Perhunova
M. P. Fedorinchik
N. V. Dezhkunov
Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
Doklady Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta informatiki i radioèlektroniki
cavitation activity
cavitation noise
ultrasound
cavitometer
spectral-acoustic method
title Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
title_full Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
title_fullStr Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
title_short Assessment of Cavitation Activity by Cavitation Noise in Different Frequency Ranges
title_sort assessment of cavitation activity by cavitation noise in different frequency ranges
topic cavitation activity
cavitation noise
ultrasound
cavitometer
spectral-acoustic method
url https://doklady.bsuir.by/jour/article/view/3929
work_keys_str_mv AT vsminchuk assessmentofcavitationactivitybycavitationnoiseindifferentfrequencyranges
AT ayperhunova assessmentofcavitationactivitybycavitationnoiseindifferentfrequencyranges
AT mpfedorinchik assessmentofcavitationactivitybycavitationnoiseindifferentfrequencyranges
AT nvdezhkunov assessmentofcavitationactivitybycavitationnoiseindifferentfrequencyranges