The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal

Background. Ureteric stent insertion during kidney transplantation reduces the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs). We evaluated whether routine poststent removal graft ultrasonography (PSRGU) was useful in detecting MUCs before they became clinically or biochemically apparent. Method...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bibek Das, Dorian Hobday, Jonathon Olsburgh, Chris Callaghan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Transplantation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1231567
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832564213583708160
author Bibek Das
Dorian Hobday
Jonathon Olsburgh
Chris Callaghan
author_facet Bibek Das
Dorian Hobday
Jonathon Olsburgh
Chris Callaghan
author_sort Bibek Das
collection DOAJ
description Background. Ureteric stent insertion during kidney transplantation reduces the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs). We evaluated whether routine poststent removal graft ultrasonography (PSRGU) was useful in detecting MUCs before they became clinically or biochemically apparent. Methods. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of clinical outcomes following elective stent removals from adult single renal transplant recipients (sRTRs) at our centre between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Results. Elective stent removal was performed for 338 sRTRs. Of these patients, 222 had routine PSRGU (median (IQR) days after stent removal = 18 (11–31)), 79 had urgent PSRGU due to clinical or biochemical indications, 12 had CT imaging, and 25 had no further renal imaging. Of the 222 sRTRs who underwent routine PSRGU, 210 (94.6%) had no change of management, three (1.4%) required repeat imaging only, and eight patients (3.6%) had incidental (nonureteric) findings. One patient (0.5%) had nephrostomy insertion as a result of routine PSRGU findings, but no ureteric stenosis was identified. Of 79 patients having urgent PSRGU after elective stent removal, three patients required transplant ureteric reimplantation. Conclusions. This analysis found no evidence that routine PSRGU at two to three weeks after elective stent removal provides any added value beyond standard clinical and biochemical monitoring.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c4ec5057d814ea2bfe32822f2c09711
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0007
2090-0015
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj-art-9c4ec5057d814ea2bfe32822f2c097112025-02-03T01:11:32ZengWileyJournal of Transplantation2090-00072090-00152016-01-01201610.1155/2016/12315671231567The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent RemovalBibek Das0Dorian Hobday1Jonathon Olsburgh2Chris Callaghan3Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UKDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UKDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UKDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UKBackground. Ureteric stent insertion during kidney transplantation reduces the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs). We evaluated whether routine poststent removal graft ultrasonography (PSRGU) was useful in detecting MUCs before they became clinically or biochemically apparent. Methods. A retrospective analysis was undertaken of clinical outcomes following elective stent removals from adult single renal transplant recipients (sRTRs) at our centre between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2013. Results. Elective stent removal was performed for 338 sRTRs. Of these patients, 222 had routine PSRGU (median (IQR) days after stent removal = 18 (11–31)), 79 had urgent PSRGU due to clinical or biochemical indications, 12 had CT imaging, and 25 had no further renal imaging. Of the 222 sRTRs who underwent routine PSRGU, 210 (94.6%) had no change of management, three (1.4%) required repeat imaging only, and eight patients (3.6%) had incidental (nonureteric) findings. One patient (0.5%) had nephrostomy insertion as a result of routine PSRGU findings, but no ureteric stenosis was identified. Of 79 patients having urgent PSRGU after elective stent removal, three patients required transplant ureteric reimplantation. Conclusions. This analysis found no evidence that routine PSRGU at two to three weeks after elective stent removal provides any added value beyond standard clinical and biochemical monitoring.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1231567
spellingShingle Bibek Das
Dorian Hobday
Jonathon Olsburgh
Chris Callaghan
The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
Journal of Transplantation
title The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
title_full The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
title_fullStr The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
title_short The Utility of Routine Ultrasound Imaging after Elective Transplant Ureteric Stent Removal
title_sort utility of routine ultrasound imaging after elective transplant ureteric stent removal
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1231567
work_keys_str_mv AT bibekdas theutilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT dorianhobday theutilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT jonathonolsburgh theutilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT chriscallaghan theutilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT bibekdas utilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT dorianhobday utilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT jonathonolsburgh utilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval
AT chriscallaghan utilityofroutineultrasoundimagingafterelectivetransplanturetericstentremoval