Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry

Objective To examine the role of social media in promoting recall and belief of distorted science about nicotine and COVID-19 and whether recall and belief predict tobacco industry beliefs.Design Young adults aged 18–34 years (N=1225) were surveyed cross-sectionally via online Qualtrics panel. The s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elexis C Kierstead, Barbara Schillo, Jodie Briggs, Nathan A Silver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e057027.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583857486954496
author Elexis C Kierstead
Barbara Schillo
Jodie Briggs
Nathan A Silver
author_facet Elexis C Kierstead
Barbara Schillo
Jodie Briggs
Nathan A Silver
author_sort Elexis C Kierstead
collection DOAJ
description Objective To examine the role of social media in promoting recall and belief of distorted science about nicotine and COVID-19 and whether recall and belief predict tobacco industry beliefs.Design Young adults aged 18–34 years (N=1225) were surveyed cross-sectionally via online Qualtrics panel. The survey assessed recall and belief in three claims about nicotine and COVID-19 and three about nicotine in general followed by assessments of industry beliefs and use of social media. Ordinal logistic regression with robust standard errors controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, education, current e-cigarette use and age was used to examine relationships between variables.Results Twitter use was associated with higher odds of recall (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.44) and belief (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.52) in COVID-19-specific distorted science. YouTube use was associated with higher odds of believing COVID-19-specific distorted science (OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.09 to 1.60). Reddit use was associated with lower odds of believing COVID-19-specific distorted science (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.59 to 0.88). Recall (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.07 to 1.47) and belief (OR=1.28, 95% CI=1.09 to 1.50) in distorted science about nicotine in general as well as belief in distorted science specific to COVID-19 (OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.34 to 1.95) were associated with more positive beliefs about the tobacco industry. Belief in distorted science about nicotine in general was also associated with more negative beliefs about the tobacco industry (OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.02 to 1.35).Conclusions Use of social media platforms may help to both spread and dispel distorted science about nicotine. Addressing distorted science about nicotine is important, as it appears to be associated with more favourable views of the tobacco industry which may erode public support for effective regulation.
format Article
id doaj-art-9c23d9d58f8e441aa15f8a614663f512
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-9c23d9d58f8e441aa15f8a614663f5122025-01-28T03:15:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-057027Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industryElexis C Kierstead0Barbara Schillo1Jodie Briggs2Nathan A Silver3Truth Initiative Schroeder Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA1 Schroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USASchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, District of Columbia, USASchroeder Institute, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, USAObjective To examine the role of social media in promoting recall and belief of distorted science about nicotine and COVID-19 and whether recall and belief predict tobacco industry beliefs.Design Young adults aged 18–34 years (N=1225) were surveyed cross-sectionally via online Qualtrics panel. The survey assessed recall and belief in three claims about nicotine and COVID-19 and three about nicotine in general followed by assessments of industry beliefs and use of social media. Ordinal logistic regression with robust standard errors controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, education, current e-cigarette use and age was used to examine relationships between variables.Results Twitter use was associated with higher odds of recall (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.01 to 1.44) and belief (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.52) in COVID-19-specific distorted science. YouTube use was associated with higher odds of believing COVID-19-specific distorted science (OR=1.32, 95% CI=1.09 to 1.60). Reddit use was associated with lower odds of believing COVID-19-specific distorted science (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.59 to 0.88). Recall (OR=1.26, 95% CI=1.07 to 1.47) and belief (OR=1.28, 95% CI=1.09 to 1.50) in distorted science about nicotine in general as well as belief in distorted science specific to COVID-19 (OR=1.61, 95% CI=1.34 to 1.95) were associated with more positive beliefs about the tobacco industry. Belief in distorted science about nicotine in general was also associated with more negative beliefs about the tobacco industry (OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.02 to 1.35).Conclusions Use of social media platforms may help to both spread and dispel distorted science about nicotine. Addressing distorted science about nicotine is important, as it appears to be associated with more favourable views of the tobacco industry which may erode public support for effective regulation.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e057027.full
spellingShingle Elexis C Kierstead
Barbara Schillo
Jodie Briggs
Nathan A Silver
Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
BMJ Open
title Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
title_full Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
title_fullStr Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
title_full_unstemmed Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
title_short Charming e-cigarette users with distorted science: a survey examining social media platform use, nicotine-related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
title_sort charming e cigarette users with distorted science a survey examining social media platform use nicotine related misinformation and attitudes towards the tobacco industry
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e057027.full
work_keys_str_mv AT elexisckierstead charmingecigaretteuserswithdistortedscienceasurveyexaminingsocialmediaplatformusenicotinerelatedmisinformationandattitudestowardsthetobaccoindustry
AT barbaraschillo charmingecigaretteuserswithdistortedscienceasurveyexaminingsocialmediaplatformusenicotinerelatedmisinformationandattitudestowardsthetobaccoindustry
AT jodiebriggs charmingecigaretteuserswithdistortedscienceasurveyexaminingsocialmediaplatformusenicotinerelatedmisinformationandattitudestowardsthetobaccoindustry
AT nathanasilver charmingecigaretteuserswithdistortedscienceasurveyexaminingsocialmediaplatformusenicotinerelatedmisinformationandattitudestowardsthetobaccoindustry