Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages

The article compares machine learning tools using the example of several popular programming languages. Existing tools in the following programming languages were tested and compared with each other: Python, Java, R, Julia, C#. For the needs of article, algorithms were created in each studied langu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomasz Wiejak, Jakub Smołka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lublin University of Technology 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6589
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832570018621030400
author Tomasz Wiejak
Jakub Smołka
author_facet Tomasz Wiejak
Jakub Smołka
author_sort Tomasz Wiejak
collection DOAJ
description The article compares machine learning tools using the example of several popular programming languages. Existing tools in the following programming languages were tested and compared with each other: Python, Java, R, Julia, C#. For the needs of article, algorithms were created in each studied language, operating on the same test set and using algorithms from the same group. The collected results included the program's running time, number of lines of code and accuracy of trained model. Based on the obtained data, conclusions were drawn that interpreted language libraries in terms of creating machine learning solutions are more effective than compiled language libraries.
format Article
id doaj-art-9bcba630856d4d9494c69e2530b8d249
institution Kabale University
issn 2544-0764
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Lublin University of Technology
record_format Article
series Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
spelling doaj-art-9bcba630856d4d9494c69e2530b8d2492025-02-02T17:59:45ZengLublin University of TechnologyJournal of Computer Sciences Institute2544-07642024-12-013310.35784/jcsi.6589Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languagesTomasz Wiejak0Jakub Smołka1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-2537Lublin University of TechnologyLublin University of Technology The article compares machine learning tools using the example of several popular programming languages. Existing tools in the following programming languages were tested and compared with each other: Python, Java, R, Julia, C#. For the needs of article, algorithms were created in each studied language, operating on the same test set and using algorithms from the same group. The collected results included the program's running time, number of lines of code and accuracy of trained model. Based on the obtained data, conclusions were drawn that interpreted language libraries in terms of creating machine learning solutions are more effective than compiled language libraries. https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6589machine learninginterpreted languagecompiled language
spellingShingle Tomasz Wiejak
Jakub Smołka
Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
machine learning
interpreted language
compiled language
title Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
title_full Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
title_fullStr Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
title_full_unstemmed Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
title_short Performance of machine learning tools. Comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
title_sort performance of machine learning tools comparve analysis of libraries in interpreted and compiled programming languages
topic machine learning
interpreted language
compiled language
url https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/6589
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszwiejak performanceofmachinelearningtoolscomparveanalysisoflibrariesininterpretedandcompiledprogramminglanguages
AT jakubsmołka performanceofmachinelearningtoolscomparveanalysisoflibrariesininterpretedandcompiledprogramminglanguages