TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security

Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) devices are vulnerable to many physical attacks, including reverse engineering and side‐channel analysis because the sensitive information of circuits may be leaked through the physical characteristics of the device. A logic camouflaging circuit is proposed that use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuejun Zhang, Qiufeng Wu, Pengjun Wang, Liang Wen, Zhicun Luan, Chongyan Gu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:IET Circuits, Devices and Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1049/cds2.12080
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546823828406272
author Yuejun Zhang
Qiufeng Wu
Pengjun Wang
Liang Wen
Zhicun Luan
Chongyan Gu
author_facet Yuejun Zhang
Qiufeng Wu
Pengjun Wang
Liang Wen
Zhicun Luan
Chongyan Gu
author_sort Yuejun Zhang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Internet of Things (IoT) devices are vulnerable to many physical attacks, including reverse engineering and side‐channel analysis because the sensitive information of circuits may be leaked through the physical characteristics of the device. A logic camouflaging circuit is proposed that uses a balanced power consumption and threshold voltage‐defined technique to provide an antiphysical attack scheme to protect the hardware security for IoT devices. The proposed circuit uses a symmetric differential pull‐down network in implementing the different logic functions through the threshold voltage reconfiguration circuit. As a result, the power consumption of the circuit attains balance and stability between two different logical operations. The proposed threshold voltage‐defined power‐balance (TVD‐PB) design is fabricated using a 65‐nm CMOS technology, and the core area occupies approximately 0.0044 mm2, composed of NAND, NOR, XOR, and INV components and multiplier gates of the proposed TVD‐PB circuit. The entire chip passed the logic function tests. The measured results show that the average similarity of the TVD‐PB universal gate is 99.68%. In addition, the current margin is higher than 55 μA and power consumption of 0.455 mW during each clock cycle at 1.2 V derives 0.1072% of the normalized energy deviation and 0.0453% of the normalized standard deviation. Compared with other state‐of‐the‐art techniques, the power dependency against power attacks is improved effectively.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b912e78000f401086b61bdc0df69798
institution Kabale University
issn 1751-858X
1751-8598
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series IET Circuits, Devices and Systems
spelling doaj-art-9b912e78000f401086b61bdc0df697982025-02-03T06:47:11ZengWileyIET Circuits, Devices and Systems1751-858X1751-85982022-01-01161405210.1049/cds2.12080TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT securityYuejun Zhang0Qiufeng Wu1Pengjun Wang2Liang Wen3Zhicun Luan4Chongyan Gu5Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ningbo University Ningbo Zhejiang ChinaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ningbo University Ningbo Zhejiang ChinaCollege of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Wenzhou University Wenzhou ChinaDepartment of Electronic Technology China Coast Guard Academy Ningbo Zhejiang ChinaFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Ningbo University Ningbo Zhejiang ChinaCentre for Secure Information Technologies Institute of Electronics, Communications, and Information Technology Queen's University Belfast Belfast UKAbstract Internet of Things (IoT) devices are vulnerable to many physical attacks, including reverse engineering and side‐channel analysis because the sensitive information of circuits may be leaked through the physical characteristics of the device. A logic camouflaging circuit is proposed that uses a balanced power consumption and threshold voltage‐defined technique to provide an antiphysical attack scheme to protect the hardware security for IoT devices. The proposed circuit uses a symmetric differential pull‐down network in implementing the different logic functions through the threshold voltage reconfiguration circuit. As a result, the power consumption of the circuit attains balance and stability between two different logical operations. The proposed threshold voltage‐defined power‐balance (TVD‐PB) design is fabricated using a 65‐nm CMOS technology, and the core area occupies approximately 0.0044 mm2, composed of NAND, NOR, XOR, and INV components and multiplier gates of the proposed TVD‐PB circuit. The entire chip passed the logic function tests. The measured results show that the average similarity of the TVD‐PB universal gate is 99.68%. In addition, the current margin is higher than 55 μA and power consumption of 0.455 mW during each clock cycle at 1.2 V derives 0.1072% of the normalized energy deviation and 0.0453% of the normalized standard deviation. Compared with other state‐of‐the‐art techniques, the power dependency against power attacks is improved effectively.https://doi.org/10.1049/cds2.12080logic gatesintegrated circuit designpower consumptionCMOS logic circuitsInternet of Thingslogic design
spellingShingle Yuejun Zhang
Qiufeng Wu
Pengjun Wang
Liang Wen
Zhicun Luan
Chongyan Gu
TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
IET Circuits, Devices and Systems
logic gates
integrated circuit design
power consumption
CMOS logic circuits
Internet of Things
logic design
title TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
title_full TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
title_fullStr TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
title_full_unstemmed TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
title_short TVD‐PB logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for IoT security
title_sort tvd pb logic circuit based on camouflaging circuit for iot security
topic logic gates
integrated circuit design
power consumption
CMOS logic circuits
Internet of Things
logic design
url https://doi.org/10.1049/cds2.12080
work_keys_str_mv AT yuejunzhang tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity
AT qiufengwu tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity
AT pengjunwang tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity
AT liangwen tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity
AT zhicunluan tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity
AT chongyangu tvdpblogiccircuitbasedoncamouflagingcircuitforiotsecurity