Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorenzo Graiff, Laura Rasera, Marco Calabrese, Paolo Vigolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556765023043584
author Lorenzo Graiff
Laura Rasera
Marco Calabrese
Paolo Vigolo
author_facet Lorenzo Graiff
Laura Rasera
Marco Calabrese
Paolo Vigolo
author_sort Lorenzo Graiff
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P<0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P=0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b8532dcc4634ce2af65cad4d61c83d1
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Dentistry
spelling doaj-art-9b8532dcc4634ce2af65cad4d61c83d12025-02-03T05:44:32ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362014-01-01201410.1155/2014/148571148571Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning MethodsLorenzo Graiff0Laura Rasera1Marco Calabrese2Paolo Vigolo3Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyPrivate Practice, Via Vivaldi 13, Farra di Soligo, 31010 Treviso, ItalyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Odontostomatology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P<0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P=0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571
spellingShingle Lorenzo Graiff
Laura Rasera
Marco Calabrese
Paolo Vigolo
Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
International Journal of Dentistry
title Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_full Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_fullStr Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_full_unstemmed Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_short Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
title_sort bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts pull out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571
work_keys_str_mv AT lorenzograiff bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT laurarasera bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT marcocalabrese bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods
AT paolovigolo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods