Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832556765023043584 |
---|---|
author | Lorenzo Graiff Laura Rasera Marco Calabrese Paolo Vigolo |
author_facet | Lorenzo Graiff Laura Rasera Marco Calabrese Paolo Vigolo |
author_sort | Lorenzo Graiff |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P<0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P=0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9b8532dcc4634ce2af65cad4d61c83d1 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Dentistry |
spelling | doaj-art-9b8532dcc4634ce2af65cad4d61c83d12025-02-03T05:44:32ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362014-01-01201410.1155/2014/148571148571Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning MethodsLorenzo Graiff0Laura Rasera1Marco Calabrese2Paolo Vigolo3Department of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyPrivate Practice, Via Vivaldi 13, Farra di Soligo, 31010 Treviso, ItalyDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyDepartment of Clinical Odontostomatology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 90, 35100 Padova, ItalyThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the bond strength at the post/resin-cement interface with 3 different surface treatments of glass fiber posts and with 2 different luting resin cements. Sixty glass fiber posts (RelyX Fiber Post) were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=20) and were luted with a dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement (RelyX Unicem) and with a dual-polymerizing resin cement (RelyX ARC). This was carried out in association with a dual-polymerizing adhesive (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus) in simulated plexiglass root canals after receiving three different pretreatment procedures. A pull-out test was performed on each sample to measure bond strengths. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA. Two samples from each group were processed for SEM observations in order to investigate the morphologic aspect of the post/cement interface. Both resin cements demonstrated significant different bond strength values (P<0.0001). The surface treatment result was also statistically significant (P=0.0465). SEM examination showed a modification of the post surface after pretreatment with methyl methacrylate. The dual-polymerizing self-adhesive universal resin cement achieved higher MPa bond strength values. The use of methyl methacrylate as a surface treatment of glass fiber posts provided a significant increase in bond strengths between the posts and both luting materials.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 |
spellingShingle | Lorenzo Graiff Laura Rasera Marco Calabrese Paolo Vigolo Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods International Journal of Dentistry |
title | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_full | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_fullStr | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_short | Bonding Effectiveness of Two Adhesive Luting Cements to Glass Fiber Posts: Pull-Out Evaluation of Three Different Post Surface Conditioning Methods |
title_sort | bonding effectiveness of two adhesive luting cements to glass fiber posts pull out evaluation of three different post surface conditioning methods |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/148571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lorenzograiff bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT laurarasera bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT marcocalabrese bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods AT paolovigolo bondingeffectivenessoftwoadhesivelutingcementstoglassfiberpostspulloutevaluationofthreedifferentpostsurfaceconditioningmethods |