Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial

Background and Objective. A novel option for myofascial pain (MFP) management and muscle regeneration is intramuscular collagen injections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of intramuscular injections of collagen and lidocaine in decreasing MFP within masseter muscles. Methods. My...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta, Karolina Walczynska-Dragon, Jolanta Batko-Kapustecka, Mieszko Wieckiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Pain Research and Management
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261090
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832548964527767552
author Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta
Karolina Walczynska-Dragon
Jolanta Batko-Kapustecka
Mieszko Wieckiewicz
author_facet Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta
Karolina Walczynska-Dragon
Jolanta Batko-Kapustecka
Mieszko Wieckiewicz
author_sort Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta
collection DOAJ
description Background and Objective. A novel option for myofascial pain (MFP) management and muscle regeneration is intramuscular collagen injections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of intramuscular injections of collagen and lidocaine in decreasing MFP within masseter muscles. Methods. Myofascial pain within masseter muscles was diagnosed on the basis of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (II.1.A. 2 and 3). A total of 43 patients with diagnosed MFP within masseter muscles were enrolled to the study (17 male and 26 female, 40 ± 3.8 years old) and randomly divided into three groups. The first group received injections using 2 ml of collagen MD Muscle (Guna), the second group received 2 ml of 2% lidocaine without a vasoconstrictor, and the third group 2 ml of saline as a control (0.9% NaCl). All patients received repeated injections at one-week intervals (days 0 and 7). The visual analogue scale was used to determine pain intensity changes during each follow-up visit (days 0, 7, and 14) in each group. The masseter muscle activity was measured on each visit (days 0, 7, and 14) with surface electromyography (sEMG) (Neurobit Optima 4, Neurobit Systems). Results. We found that sEMG masseter muscle activity was significantly decreased in Group I (59.2%), less in Group II (39.3%), and least in Group III (14%). Pain intensity reduction was 53.75% in Group I, 25% in Group II, and 20.1% in Group III. Conclusions. The study confirmed that intramuscular injection of collagen is a more efficient method for reducing myofascial pain within masseter muscles than intramuscular injection of lidocaine.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b75626ee2bc4a6b8006138a3ee019db
institution Kabale University
issn 1203-6765
1918-1523
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Pain Research and Management
spelling doaj-art-9b75626ee2bc4a6b8006138a3ee019db2025-02-03T06:12:37ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67651918-15232018-01-01201810.1155/2018/82610908261090Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled TrialAleksandra Nitecka-Buchta0Karolina Walczynska-Dragon1Jolanta Batko-Kapustecka2Mieszko Wieckiewicz3Department of Temporomandibular Disorders, Unit SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Traugutta Sq. 2, 41-800 Zabrze, PolandDepartment of Temporomandibular Disorders, Unit SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Traugutta Sq. 2, 41-800 Zabrze, PolandDepartment of Temporomandibular Disorders, Unit SMDZ in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Traugutta Sq. 2, 41-800 Zabrze, PolandDepartment of Experimental Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, 26 Krakowska St., 50-425 Wroclaw, PolandBackground and Objective. A novel option for myofascial pain (MFP) management and muscle regeneration is intramuscular collagen injections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of intramuscular injections of collagen and lidocaine in decreasing MFP within masseter muscles. Methods. Myofascial pain within masseter muscles was diagnosed on the basis of the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (II.1.A. 2 and 3). A total of 43 patients with diagnosed MFP within masseter muscles were enrolled to the study (17 male and 26 female, 40 ± 3.8 years old) and randomly divided into three groups. The first group received injections using 2 ml of collagen MD Muscle (Guna), the second group received 2 ml of 2% lidocaine without a vasoconstrictor, and the third group 2 ml of saline as a control (0.9% NaCl). All patients received repeated injections at one-week intervals (days 0 and 7). The visual analogue scale was used to determine pain intensity changes during each follow-up visit (days 0, 7, and 14) in each group. The masseter muscle activity was measured on each visit (days 0, 7, and 14) with surface electromyography (sEMG) (Neurobit Optima 4, Neurobit Systems). Results. We found that sEMG masseter muscle activity was significantly decreased in Group I (59.2%), less in Group II (39.3%), and least in Group III (14%). Pain intensity reduction was 53.75% in Group I, 25% in Group II, and 20.1% in Group III. Conclusions. The study confirmed that intramuscular injection of collagen is a more efficient method for reducing myofascial pain within masseter muscles than intramuscular injection of lidocaine.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261090
spellingShingle Aleksandra Nitecka-Buchta
Karolina Walczynska-Dragon
Jolanta Batko-Kapustecka
Mieszko Wieckiewicz
Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
Pain Research and Management
title Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison between Collagen and Lidocaine Intramuscular Injections in Terms of Their Efficiency in Decreasing Myofascial Pain within Masseter Muscles: A Randomized, Single-Blind Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison between collagen and lidocaine intramuscular injections in terms of their efficiency in decreasing myofascial pain within masseter muscles a randomized single blind controlled trial
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8261090
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandraniteckabuchta comparisonbetweencollagenandlidocaineintramuscularinjectionsintermsoftheirefficiencyindecreasingmyofascialpainwithinmassetermusclesarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledtrial
AT karolinawalczynskadragon comparisonbetweencollagenandlidocaineintramuscularinjectionsintermsoftheirefficiencyindecreasingmyofascialpainwithinmassetermusclesarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledtrial
AT jolantabatkokapustecka comparisonbetweencollagenandlidocaineintramuscularinjectionsintermsoftheirefficiencyindecreasingmyofascialpainwithinmassetermusclesarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledtrial
AT mieszkowieckiewicz comparisonbetweencollagenandlidocaineintramuscularinjectionsintermsoftheirefficiencyindecreasingmyofascialpainwithinmassetermusclesarandomizedsingleblindcontrolledtrial