Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundDexmedetomidine effectively prevents emergence delirium in children. However, intravenous dexmedetomidine is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability and delayed recovery. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a method of reducing these side effects. This study aimed to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chenxu Dai, Xuemei Zhao, Aoxue Li, Xuedong Zhang, Penglei Wang, Ye Zhang, Yun Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1543344/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582040646582272
author Chenxu Dai
Chenxu Dai
Xuemei Zhao
Xuemei Zhao
Aoxue Li
Xuedong Zhang
Penglei Wang
Ye Zhang
Yun Wu
author_facet Chenxu Dai
Chenxu Dai
Xuemei Zhao
Xuemei Zhao
Aoxue Li
Xuedong Zhang
Penglei Wang
Ye Zhang
Yun Wu
author_sort Chenxu Dai
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundDexmedetomidine effectively prevents emergence delirium in children. However, intravenous dexmedetomidine is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability and delayed recovery. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a method of reducing these side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intranasal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine on emergence recovery and hemodynamics in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.MethodsA total of 139 children, aged 3–10 years, who were scheduled for elective adenotonsillectomy were randomly assigned to receive intravenous dexmedetomidine (IV DEX group) or intranasal dexmedetomidine (IN DEX group), or saline (control group) after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the highest score on the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) score during the first 30 min after awakening. Secondary outcomes included the perioperative blood pressure and heart rate, time to awakening, postoperative pain score, and length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay.ResultsThe highest PAED and pain scores were significantly lower in the IV and IN DEX groups than those in the control group during the first 30 min after awakening. However, no significant differences were observed between the IV and IN DEX groups. Notably, patients in the IN DEX group exhibited a significantly lower PAED score at 2 h and lower pain scores at 2, 4, and 6 h postoperatively than those in the IV DEX group. Patients in the IV DEX group exhibited a significantly longer awakening time and length of PACU stay than those in the IN DEX and control groups. In the IV DEX group, the heart rate was significantly lower perioperatively than at baseline, while this effect was not observed in the IN DEX group.ConclusionBoth intravenous and intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine after induction of anesthesia effectively improved emergence delirium and pain intensity in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine provided more stable hemodynamics and more prolonged analgesia and sedation than intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=180658.
format Article
id doaj-art-9b4db27ccf2a40c1a98b9c01cabc33d2
institution Kabale University
issn 1663-9812
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj-art-9b4db27ccf2a40c1a98b9c01cabc33d22025-01-30T06:22:54ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122025-01-011610.3389/fphar.2025.15433441543344Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trialChenxu Dai0Chenxu Dai1Xuemei Zhao2Xuemei Zhao3Aoxue Li4Xuedong Zhang5Penglei Wang6Ye Zhang7Yun Wu8Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fuyang People’s Hospital, Fuyang, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital of Anhui Province, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, ChinaBackgroundDexmedetomidine effectively prevents emergence delirium in children. However, intravenous dexmedetomidine is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability and delayed recovery. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been proposed as a method of reducing these side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intranasal versus intravenous dexmedetomidine on emergence recovery and hemodynamics in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy.MethodsA total of 139 children, aged 3–10 years, who were scheduled for elective adenotonsillectomy were randomly assigned to receive intravenous dexmedetomidine (IV DEX group) or intranasal dexmedetomidine (IN DEX group), or saline (control group) after anesthesia induction. The primary outcome was the highest score on the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) score during the first 30 min after awakening. Secondary outcomes included the perioperative blood pressure and heart rate, time to awakening, postoperative pain score, and length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay.ResultsThe highest PAED and pain scores were significantly lower in the IV and IN DEX groups than those in the control group during the first 30 min after awakening. However, no significant differences were observed between the IV and IN DEX groups. Notably, patients in the IN DEX group exhibited a significantly lower PAED score at 2 h and lower pain scores at 2, 4, and 6 h postoperatively than those in the IV DEX group. Patients in the IV DEX group exhibited a significantly longer awakening time and length of PACU stay than those in the IN DEX and control groups. In the IV DEX group, the heart rate was significantly lower perioperatively than at baseline, while this effect was not observed in the IN DEX group.ConclusionBoth intravenous and intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine after induction of anesthesia effectively improved emergence delirium and pain intensity in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine provided more stable hemodynamics and more prolonged analgesia and sedation than intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=180658.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1543344/fulldexmedetomidineemergence deliriumintravenousintranasalhemodynamicsrecovery
spellingShingle Chenxu Dai
Chenxu Dai
Xuemei Zhao
Xuemei Zhao
Aoxue Li
Xuedong Zhang
Penglei Wang
Ye Zhang
Yun Wu
Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Frontiers in Pharmacology
dexmedetomidine
emergence delirium
intravenous
intranasal
hemodynamics
recovery
title Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative evaluation of intravenous versus intranasal dexmedetomidine on emergence delirium and hemodynamics in pediatric patients undergoing adenotonsillectomy a randomized controlled trial
topic dexmedetomidine
emergence delirium
intravenous
intranasal
hemodynamics
recovery
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1543344/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxudai comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenxudai comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuemeizhao comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuemeizhao comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aoxueli comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xuedongzhang comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pengleiwang comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yezhang comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yunwu comparativeevaluationofintravenousversusintranasaldexmedetomidineonemergencedeliriumandhemodynamicsinpediatricpatientsundergoingadenotonsillectomyarandomizedcontrolledtrial