Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change?
Abstract Public student funding can be designed either according to the welfare principle or the provision principle. An empirical comparison contracts two groups of European countries, each following one of these principles. It appears that countries applying the provision principle provide, on ave...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2022-06-01
|
| Series: | Wirtschaftsdienst |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3217-1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832573499059732480 |
|---|---|
| author | Christoph Gwosć Gregor van der Beek |
| author_facet | Christoph Gwosć Gregor van der Beek |
| author_sort | Christoph Gwosć |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Public student funding can be designed either according to the welfare principle or the provision principle. An empirical comparison contracts two groups of European countries, each following one of these principles. It appears that countries applying the provision principle provide, on average, considerably larger parts of their student populations with public support and public support accounts for a larger share of the recipients’ total income. Students in these countries report (very) serious financial difficulties less often. However, with respect to participative equity, countries using the provision principle perform marginally worse than the countries in their peer group. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9a986dc3e6ce411a9bc0074869a0c032 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1613-978X |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2022-06-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Wirtschaftsdienst |
| spelling | doaj-art-9a986dc3e6ce411a9bc0074869a0c0322025-02-02T03:58:43ZdeuSciendoWirtschaftsdienst1613-978X2022-06-01102647948510.1007/s10273-022-3217-1Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change?Christoph Gwosć0Gregor van der Beek1Deutsches Zentrum für Hochschul- und Wissenschaftsforschung GmbHWirtschaftswissenschaft insbesondere Finanzwissenschaft, Hochschule Rhein-WaalAbstract Public student funding can be designed either according to the welfare principle or the provision principle. An empirical comparison contracts two groups of European countries, each following one of these principles. It appears that countries applying the provision principle provide, on average, considerably larger parts of their student populations with public support and public support accounts for a larger share of the recipients’ total income. Students in these countries report (very) serious financial difficulties less often. However, with respect to participative equity, countries using the provision principle perform marginally worse than the countries in their peer group.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3217-1 |
| spellingShingle | Christoph Gwosć Gregor van der Beek Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? Wirtschaftsdienst |
| title | Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? |
| title_full | Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? |
| title_fullStr | Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? |
| title_short | Crisis Management in Public Student Funding through a System Change? |
| title_sort | crisis management in public student funding through a system change |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-022-3217-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christophgwosc crisismanagementinpublicstudentfundingthroughasystemchange AT gregorvanderbeek crisismanagementinpublicstudentfundingthroughasystemchange |