Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay

Understanding donor-reactive T-cell behavior post-transplantation is challenging owing to the rarity and diversity of these cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of an assay for rapidly detecting alloreactive T cells in a mouse transplantation model. After 18 h of one-way mixed lymphocyte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryosuke Arata, Naoki Tanimine, Akhmet Seidakhmetov, Kentaro Ide, Yuka Tanaka, Hideki Ohdan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Transplant International
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.13879/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583857019289600
author Ryosuke Arata
Naoki Tanimine
Akhmet Seidakhmetov
Kentaro Ide
Yuka Tanaka
Hideki Ohdan
author_facet Ryosuke Arata
Naoki Tanimine
Akhmet Seidakhmetov
Kentaro Ide
Yuka Tanaka
Hideki Ohdan
author_sort Ryosuke Arata
collection DOAJ
description Understanding donor-reactive T-cell behavior post-transplantation is challenging owing to the rarity and diversity of these cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of an assay for rapidly detecting alloreactive T cells in a mouse transplantation model. After 18 h of one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) culture with pre-activated donor-derived stimulators, CD4+ and CD8+ donor-reactive T cells were identified by CD154 and CD137 expression, respectively. Using full MHC mismatched mouse skin transplant models, we observed an increased donor-reactive T-cell proportion by direct presentation with elevated interferon gamma and granzyme B production 7 days post-transplantation, before graft rejection. Immunosuppression with CTLA-4 IgG and anti-CD154 antibody varied depending on donor-recipient strain combinations. On day 7, donor-reactive CD8+ T-cell proportions were lower in the tolerance model (BALB/c to C3H/HeJ) than in the rejection model (BALB/c to C57BL/6); conventional proliferation readout after 4 days of MLR could not distinguish these responses. Overall, although the conventional readout for evaluating T-cell proliferation following an MLR quantifies the precursor frequency of alloreactive T cells, the assay reported herein assesses T-cell activation markers after a short-term MLR to characterize immediate immune status. These findings offer a promising tool to elucidate immune responses post-transplantation.
format Article
id doaj-art-9a5107ac4a9d4a04aac857695bf3c412
institution Kabale University
issn 1432-2277
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Transplant International
spelling doaj-art-9a5107ac4a9d4a04aac857695bf3c4122025-01-28T04:10:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Transplant International1432-22772025-01-013810.3389/ti.2025.1387913879Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection AssayRyosuke ArataNaoki TanimineAkhmet SeidakhmetovKentaro IdeYuka TanakaHideki OhdanUnderstanding donor-reactive T-cell behavior post-transplantation is challenging owing to the rarity and diversity of these cells. Here, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of an assay for rapidly detecting alloreactive T cells in a mouse transplantation model. After 18 h of one-way mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) culture with pre-activated donor-derived stimulators, CD4+ and CD8+ donor-reactive T cells were identified by CD154 and CD137 expression, respectively. Using full MHC mismatched mouse skin transplant models, we observed an increased donor-reactive T-cell proportion by direct presentation with elevated interferon gamma and granzyme B production 7 days post-transplantation, before graft rejection. Immunosuppression with CTLA-4 IgG and anti-CD154 antibody varied depending on donor-recipient strain combinations. On day 7, donor-reactive CD8+ T-cell proportions were lower in the tolerance model (BALB/c to C3H/HeJ) than in the rejection model (BALB/c to C57BL/6); conventional proliferation readout after 4 days of MLR could not distinguish these responses. Overall, although the conventional readout for evaluating T-cell proliferation following an MLR quantifies the precursor frequency of alloreactive T cells, the assay reported herein assesses T-cell activation markers after a short-term MLR to characterize immediate immune status. These findings offer a promising tool to elucidate immune responses post-transplantation.https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.13879/fullimmune monitoringallogeneic transplantationalloreactive T-cellrejectiontolerance
spellingShingle Ryosuke Arata
Naoki Tanimine
Akhmet Seidakhmetov
Kentaro Ide
Yuka Tanaka
Hideki Ohdan
Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
Transplant International
immune monitoring
allogeneic transplantation
alloreactive T-cell
rejection
tolerance
title Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
title_full Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
title_fullStr Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
title_short Discrimination of Anti-Donor Response in Allogeneic Transplantation Using an Alloreactive T-Cell Detection Assay
title_sort discrimination of anti donor response in allogeneic transplantation using an alloreactive t cell detection assay
topic immune monitoring
allogeneic transplantation
alloreactive T-cell
rejection
tolerance
url https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/articles/10.3389/ti.2025.13879/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ryosukearata discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay
AT naokitanimine discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay
AT akhmetseidakhmetov discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay
AT kentaroide discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay
AT yukatanaka discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay
AT hidekiohdan discriminationofantidonorresponseinallogeneictransplantationusinganalloreactivetcelldetectionassay