Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation has evolved over more than half a century and remarkable progress has been made in patient and graft outcomes. Despite these advances, chronic allograft dysfunction remains a major problem. Among other reasons, de novo formation of antibodies against donor human leukocyte anti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sophia Lionaki, Konstantinos Panagiotellis, Aliki Iniotaki, John N. Boletis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-01-01
Series:Clinical and Developmental Immunology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/849835
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545591694983168
author Sophia Lionaki
Konstantinos Panagiotellis
Aliki Iniotaki
John N. Boletis
author_facet Sophia Lionaki
Konstantinos Panagiotellis
Aliki Iniotaki
John N. Boletis
author_sort Sophia Lionaki
collection DOAJ
description Kidney transplantation has evolved over more than half a century and remarkable progress has been made in patient and graft outcomes. Despite these advances, chronic allograft dysfunction remains a major problem. Among other reasons, de novo formation of antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigens has been recognized as one of the major risk factors for reduced allograft survival. The type of treatment in the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) posttransplantation is largely related to the clinical syndrome the patient presents with at the time of detection. There is no consensus regarding the treatment of stable renal transplant recipients with circulating de novo DSA. On the contrast, in acute or chronic allograft dysfunction transplant centers use various protocols in order to reduce the amount of circulating DSA and achieve long-term graft survival. These protocols include removal of the antibodies by plasmapheresis, intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, or depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies along with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. This review aims at the comprehension of the clinical correlations of de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients, assessment of their prognostic value, and providing insights into the management of these patients.
format Article
id doaj-art-99b481d6ef664687ac022dcc5e40a274
institution Kabale University
issn 1740-2522
1740-2530
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Developmental Immunology
spelling doaj-art-99b481d6ef664687ac022dcc5e40a2742025-02-03T07:25:23ZengWileyClinical and Developmental Immunology1740-25221740-25302013-01-01201310.1155/2013/849835849835Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney TransplantationSophia Lionaki0Konstantinos Panagiotellis1Aliki Iniotaki2John N. Boletis3Nephrology Department and Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Street, 11527 Athens, GreeceNephrology Department and Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Street, 11527 Athens, GreeceNational Tissue Typing Center, General Hospital of Athens “G .Gennimatas”, GreeceNephrology Department and Transplantation Unit, Laiko Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Street, 11527 Athens, GreeceKidney transplantation has evolved over more than half a century and remarkable progress has been made in patient and graft outcomes. Despite these advances, chronic allograft dysfunction remains a major problem. Among other reasons, de novo formation of antibodies against donor human leukocyte antigens has been recognized as one of the major risk factors for reduced allograft survival. The type of treatment in the presence of donor specific antibodies (DSA) posttransplantation is largely related to the clinical syndrome the patient presents with at the time of detection. There is no consensus regarding the treatment of stable renal transplant recipients with circulating de novo DSA. On the contrast, in acute or chronic allograft dysfunction transplant centers use various protocols in order to reduce the amount of circulating DSA and achieve long-term graft survival. These protocols include removal of the antibodies by plasmapheresis, intravenous administration of immunoglobulin, or depletion of B cells with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies along with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. This review aims at the comprehension of the clinical correlations of de novo DSA in kidney transplant recipients, assessment of their prognostic value, and providing insights into the management of these patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/849835
spellingShingle Sophia Lionaki
Konstantinos Panagiotellis
Aliki Iniotaki
John N. Boletis
Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
Clinical and Developmental Immunology
title Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
title_full Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
title_fullStr Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
title_short Incidence and Clinical Significance of De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies after Kidney Transplantation
title_sort incidence and clinical significance of de novo donor specific antibodies after kidney transplantation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/849835
work_keys_str_mv AT sophialionaki incidenceandclinicalsignificanceofdenovodonorspecificantibodiesafterkidneytransplantation
AT konstantinospanagiotellis incidenceandclinicalsignificanceofdenovodonorspecificantibodiesafterkidneytransplantation
AT alikiiniotaki incidenceandclinicalsignificanceofdenovodonorspecificantibodiesafterkidneytransplantation
AT johnnboletis incidenceandclinicalsignificanceofdenovodonorspecificantibodiesafterkidneytransplantation