Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City

Abstract Urban land density analysis is central to urban expansion research. Different mathematical models have unique strengths and limitations in exploring land density, yet there is little systematic comparison between them. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing land use data from 2000 to 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hongfei Gao, Xuning Qiao, Yongju Yang, Liang Liu, Jinyuan Zhang, Huimin Zhou, Qianxi Zheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03009-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849325976708710400
author Hongfei Gao
Xuning Qiao
Yongju Yang
Liang Liu
Jinyuan Zhang
Huimin Zhou
Qianxi Zheng
author_facet Hongfei Gao
Xuning Qiao
Yongju Yang
Liang Liu
Jinyuan Zhang
Huimin Zhou
Qianxi Zheng
author_sort Hongfei Gao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Urban land density analysis is central to urban expansion research. Different mathematical models have unique strengths and limitations in exploring land density, yet there is little systematic comparison between them. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing land use data from 2000 to 2020 in Zhengzhou City, using two models: the Gaussian function and the inverse S function. It quantifies changes in land density and expansion trends, while also comparing the models’ applicability across expansion directions. The findings are as follows: (1) Both models show strong overall fitting abilities. However, the Gaussian model offers a more detailed understanding of urban expansion due to its multi-dimensional parameter settings. (2) In determining urban boundaries and zoning, the Gaussian model is more convenient, reflecting wave-like diffusion patterns that better match actual urban growth trends. (3) In terms of expansion direction, the urban compactness index reveals spatial heterogeneity. The inverse S function performs well, showing a clear compactness trend, while the Gaussian function’s fitting degree is weaker, with less distinct compactness patterns. Overall, these two models complement each other in analyzing urban land density, unveiling the form and mechanisms of urban expansion, and providing valuable insights for sustainable urban development.
format Article
id doaj-art-987dd757300a48c1bbe5e83d8ebc8d81
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-987dd757300a48c1bbe5e83d8ebc8d812025-08-20T03:48:15ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-05-0115112010.1038/s41598-025-03009-4Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou CityHongfei Gao0Xuning Qiao1Yongju Yang2Liang Liu3Jinyuan Zhang4Huimin Zhou5Qianxi Zheng6School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Emergency Management, Henan Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic UniversityAbstract Urban land density analysis is central to urban expansion research. Different mathematical models have unique strengths and limitations in exploring land density, yet there is little systematic comparison between them. This paper addresses this gap by analyzing land use data from 2000 to 2020 in Zhengzhou City, using two models: the Gaussian function and the inverse S function. It quantifies changes in land density and expansion trends, while also comparing the models’ applicability across expansion directions. The findings are as follows: (1) Both models show strong overall fitting abilities. However, the Gaussian model offers a more detailed understanding of urban expansion due to its multi-dimensional parameter settings. (2) In determining urban boundaries and zoning, the Gaussian model is more convenient, reflecting wave-like diffusion patterns that better match actual urban growth trends. (3) In terms of expansion direction, the urban compactness index reveals spatial heterogeneity. The inverse S function performs well, showing a clear compactness trend, while the Gaussian function’s fitting degree is weaker, with less distinct compactness patterns. Overall, these two models complement each other in analyzing urban land density, unveiling the form and mechanisms of urban expansion, and providing valuable insights for sustainable urban development.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03009-4Gaussian functionInverse S functionFitting parametersUrban boundary and partitionCompactness curveZhengzhou City
spellingShingle Hongfei Gao
Xuning Qiao
Yongju Yang
Liang Liu
Jinyuan Zhang
Huimin Zhou
Qianxi Zheng
Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
Scientific Reports
Gaussian function
Inverse S function
Fitting parameters
Urban boundary and partition
Compactness curve
Zhengzhou City
title Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
title_full Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
title_fullStr Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
title_full_unstemmed Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
title_short Modeling urban land density with Gaussian and inverse S functions by analyzing urban expansion in Zhengzhou City
title_sort modeling urban land density with gaussian and inverse s functions by analyzing urban expansion in zhengzhou city
topic Gaussian function
Inverse S function
Fitting parameters
Urban boundary and partition
Compactness curve
Zhengzhou City
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03009-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hongfeigao modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT xuningqiao modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT yongjuyang modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT liangliu modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT jinyuanzhang modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT huiminzhou modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity
AT qianxizheng modelingurbanlanddensitywithgaussianandinversesfunctionsbyanalyzingurbanexpansioninzhengzhoucity