The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report

Purpose. To explore the burden of prostate biopsy at the time of its indication, procedure, and pathological report in the prostate cancer-screening scenario that is neglected and underestimated in the literature. Methods. Prostate biopsy was offered to 47 consecutive patients with prostate-specific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walker W. Laranja, Brunno C. F. Sanches, Brunno R. I. Voris, João C. C. Alonso, Fabiano A. Simões, Ronald F. Rejowski, Leonardo O. Reis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2653708
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551893651423232
author Walker W. Laranja
Brunno C. F. Sanches
Brunno R. I. Voris
João C. C. Alonso
Fabiano A. Simões
Ronald F. Rejowski
Leonardo O. Reis
author_facet Walker W. Laranja
Brunno C. F. Sanches
Brunno R. I. Voris
João C. C. Alonso
Fabiano A. Simões
Ronald F. Rejowski
Leonardo O. Reis
author_sort Walker W. Laranja
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To explore the burden of prostate biopsy at the time of its indication, procedure, and pathological report in the prostate cancer-screening scenario that is neglected and underestimated in the literature. Methods. Prostate biopsy was offered to 47 consecutive patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over 4 ng/dl or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) of whom 16 had undergone a biopsy. Comprehensive validated questionnaires at Time 0 (prebiopsy), Time 1 (before diagnosis, 20 days after biopsy), and Time 2 (after diagnosis, 40 days after biopsy) accessed patients' erectile (IIEF-5) and voiding (IPSS) functions, Beck scales measured anxiety (BAI), hopelessness (BHS), and depression (BDI), added to the emotional thermometers including five visual analog scales for distress, anxiety, depression, anger, and need for help. The Mann-Whitney or Friedman tests were obtained among times and studied variables. Results. Prostate biopsy did not significantly impact patients' erectile and voiding functions while a higher Beck anxiety index (BAI) was observed at Time 0 (6.89 ± 6.33) compared to Time 1 (4.83 ± 2.87), p=0.0214, and to Time 2 (4.22 ± 4.98), p=0.0178. At Time 0, patients that experienced a previous biopsy presented higher distress (3.1 ± 3.0 vs. 1.6 ± 2.3), p=0.043, and emotional suffering thermometer scores (2.3 ± 3.3 vs. 0.9 ± 2.4) compared to those undergoing the first biopsy, p=0.036. At Time 2, patients with positive biopsies compared with those with negative ones showed no significant difference in outcome scores. The sample power was >90%. Conclusions. To be considered in patients' counseling and care, the current study supports the hypothesis that the peak burden of prostate biopsy occurs at the time of its indication and might be higher for those experiencing rebiopsy, significantly impacting patients' psychosocial domains. Trial Approval. This trial is registered under number NCT03783741.
format Article
id doaj-art-97e51c7cea144630b8379894007fbf2b
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Prostate Cancer
spelling doaj-art-97e51c7cea144630b8379894007fbf2b2025-02-03T06:00:10ZengWileyProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2019-01-01201910.1155/2019/26537082653708The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological ReportWalker W. Laranja0Brunno C. F. Sanches1Brunno R. I. Voris2João C. C. Alonso3Fabiano A. Simões4Ronald F. Rejowski5Leonardo O. Reis6University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilUniversity of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, BrazilPurpose. To explore the burden of prostate biopsy at the time of its indication, procedure, and pathological report in the prostate cancer-screening scenario that is neglected and underestimated in the literature. Methods. Prostate biopsy was offered to 47 consecutive patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) over 4 ng/dl or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) of whom 16 had undergone a biopsy. Comprehensive validated questionnaires at Time 0 (prebiopsy), Time 1 (before diagnosis, 20 days after biopsy), and Time 2 (after diagnosis, 40 days after biopsy) accessed patients' erectile (IIEF-5) and voiding (IPSS) functions, Beck scales measured anxiety (BAI), hopelessness (BHS), and depression (BDI), added to the emotional thermometers including five visual analog scales for distress, anxiety, depression, anger, and need for help. The Mann-Whitney or Friedman tests were obtained among times and studied variables. Results. Prostate biopsy did not significantly impact patients' erectile and voiding functions while a higher Beck anxiety index (BAI) was observed at Time 0 (6.89 ± 6.33) compared to Time 1 (4.83 ± 2.87), p=0.0214, and to Time 2 (4.22 ± 4.98), p=0.0178. At Time 0, patients that experienced a previous biopsy presented higher distress (3.1 ± 3.0 vs. 1.6 ± 2.3), p=0.043, and emotional suffering thermometer scores (2.3 ± 3.3 vs. 0.9 ± 2.4) compared to those undergoing the first biopsy, p=0.036. At Time 2, patients with positive biopsies compared with those with negative ones showed no significant difference in outcome scores. The sample power was >90%. Conclusions. To be considered in patients' counseling and care, the current study supports the hypothesis that the peak burden of prostate biopsy occurs at the time of its indication and might be higher for those experiencing rebiopsy, significantly impacting patients' psychosocial domains. Trial Approval. This trial is registered under number NCT03783741.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2653708
spellingShingle Walker W. Laranja
Brunno C. F. Sanches
Brunno R. I. Voris
João C. C. Alonso
Fabiano A. Simões
Ronald F. Rejowski
Leonardo O. Reis
The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
Prostate Cancer
title The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
title_full The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
title_fullStr The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
title_full_unstemmed The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
title_short The Biopsychosocial Burden of Prostate Biopsy at the Time of Its Indication, Procedure, and Pathological Report
title_sort biopsychosocial burden of prostate biopsy at the time of its indication procedure and pathological report
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/2653708
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerwlaranja thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT brunnocfsanches thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT brunnorivoris thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT joaoccalonso thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT fabianoasimoes thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT ronaldfrejowski thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT leonardooreis thebiopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT walkerwlaranja biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT brunnocfsanches biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT brunnorivoris biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT joaoccalonso biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT fabianoasimoes biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT ronaldfrejowski biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport
AT leonardooreis biopsychosocialburdenofprostatebiopsyatthetimeofitsindicationprocedureandpathologicalreport