Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach

This paper determines how the rule-in-use on access to agricultural land affects both the size of Russian farms and the nature of land property via enforcement mechanisms. The concept of “institutional arrangements”, developed by Ostrom, is used to show that land use practices by farmers can be cons...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pascal Grouiez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association Recherche & Régulation 2014-02-01
Series:Revue de la Régulation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10496
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832577908923695104
author Pascal Grouiez
author_facet Pascal Grouiez
author_sort Pascal Grouiez
collection DOAJ
description This paper determines how the rule-in-use on access to agricultural land affects both the size of Russian farms and the nature of land property via enforcement mechanisms. The concept of “institutional arrangements”, developed by Ostrom, is used to show that land use practices by farmers can be considered a compromise between legal land access regimes and economic and social interests of nested communities. This compromise leads to the preservation of both large-scale agricultural production units and “land-share ownership” in Orel.
format Article
id doaj-art-97d4cd76dbde440ab6214e60b23c24e5
institution Kabale University
issn 1957-7796
language English
publishDate 2014-02-01
publisher Association Recherche & Régulation
record_format Article
series Revue de la Régulation
spelling doaj-art-97d4cd76dbde440ab6214e60b23c24e52025-01-30T14:26:30ZengAssociation Recherche & RégulationRevue de la Régulation1957-77962014-02-011410.4000/regulation.10496Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approachPascal GrouiezThis paper determines how the rule-in-use on access to agricultural land affects both the size of Russian farms and the nature of land property via enforcement mechanisms. The concept of “institutional arrangements”, developed by Ostrom, is used to show that land use practices by farmers can be considered a compromise between legal land access regimes and economic and social interests of nested communities. This compromise leads to the preservation of both large-scale agricultural production units and “land-share ownership” in Orel.https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10496Russian land tenure regimecollective land propertynew investorsinstitutional arrangementsenforcement mechanismslarge-scale agricultural production units
spellingShingle Pascal Grouiez
Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
Revue de la Régulation
Russian land tenure regime
collective land property
new investors
institutional arrangements
enforcement mechanisms
large-scale agricultural production units
title Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
title_full Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
title_fullStr Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
title_short Understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in Russia: the input of Ostrom’s approach
title_sort understanding the puzzling resilience of the land share ownership in russia the input of ostrom s approach
topic Russian land tenure regime
collective land property
new investors
institutional arrangements
enforcement mechanisms
large-scale agricultural production units
url https://journals.openedition.org/regulation/10496
work_keys_str_mv AT pascalgrouiez understandingthepuzzlingresilienceofthelandshareownershipinrussiatheinputofostromsapproach