The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished!
This paper analyzes the practice of the Supreme Court (of Cassation) in cases where this court ruled on the limits of criminalization in blanket economic criminal offenses. For many years, defense attorneys in these cases have presented the Supreme Court with the issue of distinguishing bet ween cri...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2024/0550-21792403621T.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832096600938250240 |
|---|---|
| author | Todorović Aleksandar D. |
| author_facet | Todorović Aleksandar D. |
| author_sort | Todorović Aleksandar D. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper analyzes the practice of the Supreme Court (of Cassation) in cases where this court ruled on the limits of criminalization in blanket economic criminal offenses. For many years, defense attorneys in these cases have presented the Supreme Court with the issue of distinguishing bet ween criminal and civil liability, as well as the issue of determining the specific act of commission alleged against suspects when they are prosecuted for blanket economic criminal offenses. Attempts by defense attorneys to obtain an accurate response from the Supreme Court regarding the distinction bet ween criminal and civil liability, and to receive an answer about the extent to which the act of commission of these blanket offenses can be expanded, have not borne fruit. The aim of the paper is to determine whether the Supreme Court (of Casation) applies the standards arising from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the principle of legality. By comparing the positions taken by the Supreme Court in its decisions with the positions of legal theory regarding the significance, nature, and content of guarantees arising from the principle of legality, and further comparing them with the positions taken on this issue by the European Court of Human Rights, this paper concludes that the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses has been completely undermined. It also suggests that suspects are subjected to entirely arbitrary prosecution for these criminal offenses. The flexibility of judicial interpretation in determining the boundaries of liability in blanket economic criminal offenses has gone so far that it can truly be said that courts in Serbia, in these cases, are guided by the principle of good faith rather than the principle of legality, hence the paper's subtitle. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-97aa327272534b46be0c061f768795e6 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0550-2179 2406-1255 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu |
| spelling | doaj-art-97aa327272534b46be0c061f768795e62025-02-05T13:32:01ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552024-01-0158362164210.5937/zrpfns58-538670550-21792403621TThe limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished!Todorović Aleksandar D.0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2501-6351Advokatska komora Vojvodine, Novi Sad, SerbiaThis paper analyzes the practice of the Supreme Court (of Cassation) in cases where this court ruled on the limits of criminalization in blanket economic criminal offenses. For many years, defense attorneys in these cases have presented the Supreme Court with the issue of distinguishing bet ween criminal and civil liability, as well as the issue of determining the specific act of commission alleged against suspects when they are prosecuted for blanket economic criminal offenses. Attempts by defense attorneys to obtain an accurate response from the Supreme Court regarding the distinction bet ween criminal and civil liability, and to receive an answer about the extent to which the act of commission of these blanket offenses can be expanded, have not borne fruit. The aim of the paper is to determine whether the Supreme Court (of Casation) applies the standards arising from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the principle of legality. By comparing the positions taken by the Supreme Court in its decisions with the positions of legal theory regarding the significance, nature, and content of guarantees arising from the principle of legality, and further comparing them with the positions taken on this issue by the European Court of Human Rights, this paper concludes that the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses has been completely undermined. It also suggests that suspects are subjected to entirely arbitrary prosecution for these criminal offenses. The flexibility of judicial interpretation in determining the boundaries of liability in blanket economic criminal offenses has gone so far that it can truly be said that courts in Serbia, in these cases, are guided by the principle of good faith rather than the principle of legality, hence the paper's subtitle.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2024/0550-21792403621T.pdflimits of criminalizationprinciple of legalityblanket criminal offensesabuse of position of a responsible person |
| spellingShingle | Todorović Aleksandar D. The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu limits of criminalization principle of legality blanket criminal offenses abuse of position of a responsible person |
| title | The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! |
| title_full | The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! |
| title_fullStr | The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! |
| title_full_unstemmed | The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! |
| title_short | The limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses: Whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished! |
| title_sort | limits of criminalization and the principle of legality in blanket economic criminal offenses whoever does not deal in good faith shall be punished |
| topic | limits of criminalization principle of legality blanket criminal offenses abuse of position of a responsible person |
| url | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2024/0550-21792403621T.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT todorovicaleksandard thelimitsofcriminalizationandtheprincipleoflegalityinblanketeconomiccriminaloffenseswhoeverdoesnotdealingoodfaithshallbepunished AT todorovicaleksandard limitsofcriminalizationandtheprincipleoflegalityinblanketeconomiccriminaloffenseswhoeverdoesnotdealingoodfaithshallbepunished |