Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Background. Body composition measurement is very important for early nutritional care in hemodialysis patients. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a gold standard test, but clinically limited. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with multifrequency technique is a practical and reliable too...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kulapong Jayanama, Supanee Putadechakun, Praopilad Srisuwarn, Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara, Prapimporn Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul, Chanika Sritara, Surasak Kantachuvesiri, Surat Komindr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4537623
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556284390408192
author Kulapong Jayanama
Supanee Putadechakun
Praopilad Srisuwarn
Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara
Prapimporn Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul
Chanika Sritara
Surasak Kantachuvesiri
Surat Komindr
author_facet Kulapong Jayanama
Supanee Putadechakun
Praopilad Srisuwarn
Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara
Prapimporn Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul
Chanika Sritara
Surasak Kantachuvesiri
Surat Komindr
author_sort Kulapong Jayanama
collection DOAJ
description Background. Body composition measurement is very important for early nutritional care in hemodialysis patients. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a gold standard test, but clinically limited. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with multifrequency technique is a practical and reliable tool. Objective. This cross-sectional study was aimed to compare the agreement of BIA with DXA in measurement of body composition in hemodialysis patients and to evaluate their associated factors. Methods. Body composition was measured by 2 BIA methods (InBody S10 and InBody 720) and DXA after a hemodialysis session. A total of 69 measurements were included. Pearson’s correlation and Bland and Altman analysis were used to determine the correlation of body composition between methods and to compare the methods agreement, respectively. Results. The correlation coefficients of body compositions were strong between DXA and InBody S10 (fat mass index (FMI): r=0.95, fat-free mass index (FFMI): r=0.78) and also between DXA and InBody 720 (FMI: r=0.96, FFMI: r=0.81). Comparing to DXA, the means of each body composition measured by InBody S10 method were not significantly different in each gender, but differences were found in FM, %FM, and FMI measured by InBody 720. Conclusions. In maintenance hemodialysis patients, the measurement of body composition with DXA and both BIA methods had highly significant correlations; practically, BIA method could be used as an instrument to follow FM and FFM and to measure the edematous stage. Further studies with large populations are warranted.
format Article
id doaj-art-96fe4f8b077342fc8b3dbdc3a47e5b37
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0724
2090-0732
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
spelling doaj-art-96fe4f8b077342fc8b3dbdc3a47e5b372025-02-03T05:45:52ZengWileyJournal of Nutrition and Metabolism2090-07242090-07322018-01-01201810.1155/2018/45376234537623Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray AbsorptiometryKulapong Jayanama0Supanee Putadechakun1Praopilad Srisuwarn2Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara3Prapimporn Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul4Chanika Sritara5Surasak Kantachuvesiri6Surat Komindr7Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nutrition and Biochemical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nutrition and Biochemical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandSection for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nutrition and Biochemical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandDivision of Nutrition and Biochemical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, 270 Rama 6 Road Thungphayathai, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, ThailandBackground. Body composition measurement is very important for early nutritional care in hemodialysis patients. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a gold standard test, but clinically limited. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with multifrequency technique is a practical and reliable tool. Objective. This cross-sectional study was aimed to compare the agreement of BIA with DXA in measurement of body composition in hemodialysis patients and to evaluate their associated factors. Methods. Body composition was measured by 2 BIA methods (InBody S10 and InBody 720) and DXA after a hemodialysis session. A total of 69 measurements were included. Pearson’s correlation and Bland and Altman analysis were used to determine the correlation of body composition between methods and to compare the methods agreement, respectively. Results. The correlation coefficients of body compositions were strong between DXA and InBody S10 (fat mass index (FMI): r=0.95, fat-free mass index (FFMI): r=0.78) and also between DXA and InBody 720 (FMI: r=0.96, FFMI: r=0.81). Comparing to DXA, the means of each body composition measured by InBody S10 method were not significantly different in each gender, but differences were found in FM, %FM, and FMI measured by InBody 720. Conclusions. In maintenance hemodialysis patients, the measurement of body composition with DXA and both BIA methods had highly significant correlations; practically, BIA method could be used as an instrument to follow FM and FFM and to measure the edematous stage. Further studies with large populations are warranted.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4537623
spellingShingle Kulapong Jayanama
Supanee Putadechakun
Praopilad Srisuwarn
Sakda Arj-Ong Vallibhakara
Prapimporn Chattranukulchai Shantavasinkul
Chanika Sritara
Surasak Kantachuvesiri
Surat Komindr
Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism
title Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
title_full Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
title_fullStr Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
title_short Evaluation of Body Composition in Hemodialysis Thai Patients: Comparison between Two Models of Bioelectrical Impedance Analyzer and Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
title_sort evaluation of body composition in hemodialysis thai patients comparison between two models of bioelectrical impedance analyzer and dual energy x ray absorptiometry
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/4537623
work_keys_str_mv AT kulapongjayanama evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT supaneeputadechakun evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT praopiladsrisuwarn evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT sakdaarjongvallibhakara evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT prapimpornchattranukulchaishantavasinkul evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT chanikasritara evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT surasakkantachuvesiri evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT suratkomindr evaluationofbodycompositioninhemodialysisthaipatientscomparisonbetweentwomodelsofbioelectricalimpedanceanalyzeranddualenergyxrayabsorptiometry