Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction

Purpose. To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. Methods. Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santiago Escandón-García, Filomena J. Ribeiro, Colm McAlinden, António Queirós, José M. González-Méijome
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832545800976072704
author Santiago Escandón-García
Filomena J. Ribeiro
Colm McAlinden
António Queirós
José M. González-Méijome
author_facet Santiago Escandón-García
Filomena J. Ribeiro
Colm McAlinden
António Queirós
José M. González-Méijome
author_sort Santiago Escandón-García
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. Methods. Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received the FineVision® and seven patients received the PanOptix™ trifocal IOLs. Fifteen patients received the Symfony extended depth of focus IOL. Mean age of patients was 63 ± 8 years. Through-focus visual acuity was measured from –3.00 to +1.00 D vergences. Contrast sensitivity was measured with and without a source of glare. Light disturbances were evaluated with the Light Distortion Analyzer. Results. Though-focus evaluation showed that trifocal IOLs performed significantly better at near distance (33 and 40 cm), and extended depth of focus performed significantly better at intermediate distance (1.0 m). Contrast sensitivity function with glare and dysphotopsia was similar between the three IOLs and subjective response to questionnaire showed a significantly higher score (worse performance) for the extended depth of focus IOL compared to both trifocal IOLs in the bothersome subscale (p<0.05). Conclusions. Trifocal IOLs grant better performance at near distance while extended depth of focus IOL performs better at intermediate distance. Objective dysphotopsia measured with the Light Distortion Analyzer is not reduced in extended depth of focus IOL compared to trifocal IOLs.
format Article
id doaj-art-96fcd4bbd3ec4468bc02996244bc4d33
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-96fcd4bbd3ec4468bc02996244bc4d332025-02-03T07:24:39ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582018-01-01201810.1155/2018/61654936165493Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia CorrectionSantiago Escandón-García0Filomena J. Ribeiro1Colm McAlinden2António Queirós3José M. González-Méijome4Clinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, PortugalHospital da Luz, Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Glangwili Hospital, Hywel Dda University Hospital Board, Carmarthen, UKClinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, PortugalClinical & Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics, University of Minho, Braga, PortugalPurpose. To compare the through-focus visual performance in a clinical population of pseudophakic patients implanted with two new trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and one extended depth of focus IOL. Methods. Prospective, nonrandomized, examiner-masked case series. Twenty-three patients received the FineVision® and seven patients received the PanOptix™ trifocal IOLs. Fifteen patients received the Symfony extended depth of focus IOL. Mean age of patients was 63 ± 8 years. Through-focus visual acuity was measured from –3.00 to +1.00 D vergences. Contrast sensitivity was measured with and without a source of glare. Light disturbances were evaluated with the Light Distortion Analyzer. Results. Though-focus evaluation showed that trifocal IOLs performed significantly better at near distance (33 and 40 cm), and extended depth of focus performed significantly better at intermediate distance (1.0 m). Contrast sensitivity function with glare and dysphotopsia was similar between the three IOLs and subjective response to questionnaire showed a significantly higher score (worse performance) for the extended depth of focus IOL compared to both trifocal IOLs in the bothersome subscale (p<0.05). Conclusions. Trifocal IOLs grant better performance at near distance while extended depth of focus IOL performs better at intermediate distance. Objective dysphotopsia measured with the Light Distortion Analyzer is not reduced in extended depth of focus IOL compared to trifocal IOLs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
spellingShingle Santiago Escandón-García
Filomena J. Ribeiro
Colm McAlinden
António Queirós
José M. González-Méijome
Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_full Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_fullStr Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_full_unstemmed Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_short Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction
title_sort through focus vision performance and light disturbances of 3 new intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6165493
work_keys_str_mv AT santiagoescandongarcia throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT filomenajribeiro throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT colmmcalinden throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT antonioqueiros throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection
AT josemgonzalezmeijome throughfocusvisionperformanceandlightdisturbancesof3newintraocularlensesforpresbyopiacorrection