Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and results from high eye pressure-induced damage to the optic nerves, thereby preventing visual information from reaching the brain. While glaucoma is incurable in its advanced stages, its early detection improves the treatment outcome. Recently, c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brendan Ubochi, Abayomi E. Olawumi, John Macaulay, Oyawoye I. Ayomide, Kayode F. Akingbade
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8053117
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832569138189434880
author Brendan Ubochi
Abayomi E. Olawumi
John Macaulay
Oyawoye I. Ayomide
Kayode F. Akingbade
author_facet Brendan Ubochi
Abayomi E. Olawumi
John Macaulay
Oyawoye I. Ayomide
Kayode F. Akingbade
author_sort Brendan Ubochi
collection DOAJ
description Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and results from high eye pressure-induced damage to the optic nerves, thereby preventing visual information from reaching the brain. While glaucoma is incurable in its advanced stages, its early detection improves the treatment outcome. Recently, computational models for image classification have enabled early detection of glaucoma from OCT scans of patients and will potentially augment the medical diagnosis of this disease. Models that are based on the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in the early detection of glaucoma. These models vary in their architectures and their accuracies depend largely on the intrinsic nature of the training datasets used. Hence, in this work, a comparative analysis is performed on vanilla CNN, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50 using two popular glaucoma datasets (ACRIMA and ORIGA). With careful attention to exhaustive image processing, an impressive training accuracy of 89% and validation accuracy of 50% was obtained from the vanilla CNN, showing a high sensitivity of 88% in detecting glaucomatous patients from OCT scans. However, the other models (AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet5) overfitted with a large difference between the obtained training accuracy and validation accuracy. The results also reveal that ResNet50 has the highest computational cost compared to the rest of the models. The obtained results demonstrate the peculiarity of the dataset, its selectiveness of the most appropriate model, and the potential of deep neural networks (DNNs) as an effective screening tool for glaucoma, enabling prompt interventions, reducing healthcare costs, and helping optometrists make swift decisions.
format Article
id doaj-art-96c517c932b24d349ee9c3541c7d4de6
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-0155
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
spelling doaj-art-96c517c932b24d349ee9c3541c7d4de62025-02-02T23:14:32ZengWileyJournal of Electrical and Computer Engineering2090-01552024-01-01202410.1155/2024/8053117Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma DetectionBrendan Ubochi0Abayomi E. Olawumi1John Macaulay2Oyawoye I. Ayomide3Kayode F. Akingbade4Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringDepartment of MathematicsCardiff School of TechnologiesDepartment of Computer EngineeringDepartment of Information and Communication TechnologyGlaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide and results from high eye pressure-induced damage to the optic nerves, thereby preventing visual information from reaching the brain. While glaucoma is incurable in its advanced stages, its early detection improves the treatment outcome. Recently, computational models for image classification have enabled early detection of glaucoma from OCT scans of patients and will potentially augment the medical diagnosis of this disease. Models that are based on the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in the early detection of glaucoma. These models vary in their architectures and their accuracies depend largely on the intrinsic nature of the training datasets used. Hence, in this work, a comparative analysis is performed on vanilla CNN, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet50 using two popular glaucoma datasets (ACRIMA and ORIGA). With careful attention to exhaustive image processing, an impressive training accuracy of 89% and validation accuracy of 50% was obtained from the vanilla CNN, showing a high sensitivity of 88% in detecting glaucomatous patients from OCT scans. However, the other models (AlexNet, GoogLeNet, and ResNet5) overfitted with a large difference between the obtained training accuracy and validation accuracy. The results also reveal that ResNet50 has the highest computational cost compared to the rest of the models. The obtained results demonstrate the peculiarity of the dataset, its selectiveness of the most appropriate model, and the potential of deep neural networks (DNNs) as an effective screening tool for glaucoma, enabling prompt interventions, reducing healthcare costs, and helping optometrists make swift decisions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8053117
spellingShingle Brendan Ubochi
Abayomi E. Olawumi
John Macaulay
Oyawoye I. Ayomide
Kayode F. Akingbade
Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
title Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
title_full Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
title_short Comparative Analysis of Vanilla CNN and Transfer Learning Models for Glaucoma Detection
title_sort comparative analysis of vanilla cnn and transfer learning models for glaucoma detection
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2024/8053117
work_keys_str_mv AT brendanubochi comparativeanalysisofvanillacnnandtransferlearningmodelsforglaucomadetection
AT abayomieolawumi comparativeanalysisofvanillacnnandtransferlearningmodelsforglaucomadetection
AT johnmacaulay comparativeanalysisofvanillacnnandtransferlearningmodelsforglaucomadetection
AT oyawoyeiayomide comparativeanalysisofvanillacnnandtransferlearningmodelsforglaucomadetection
AT kayodefakingbade comparativeanalysisofvanillacnnandtransferlearningmodelsforglaucomadetection