Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions
Abstract Uncertainty lies at the heart of everyday choices, affecting both decisions about precise quantities and those with less tangible, more qualitative, outcomes. Previous literature on decisions under uncertainty focused on alternatives with quantifiable outcomes, for example monetary lotterie...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Scientific Reports |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87644-x |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832585858603024384 |
|---|---|
| author | Ohad Dan Chelsea Y. Xu Ruonan Jia Emily K. Wertheimer Megha Chawla Galit Fuhrmann Alpert Terri Fried Ifat Levy |
| author_facet | Ohad Dan Chelsea Y. Xu Ruonan Jia Emily K. Wertheimer Megha Chawla Galit Fuhrmann Alpert Terri Fried Ifat Levy |
| author_sort | Ohad Dan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Uncertainty lies at the heart of everyday choices, affecting both decisions about precise quantities and those with less tangible, more qualitative, outcomes. Previous literature on decisions under uncertainty focused on alternatives with quantifiable outcomes, for example monetary lotteries. In such scenarios, decision-makers make decisions based on success chance, outcome magnitude, and individual preferences for uncertainty. It is not clear, however, how individuals construct subjective values when outcomes are not directly quantifiable. To explore how decision-makers choose between non-quantifiable uncertain outcomes, we focus here on medical decisions with qualitative outcomes. Specifically, we ask whether decision-makers exhibit similar attitudes towards uncertainty, focusing on ambiguity, across domains with quantitative and qualitative outcomes. We designed an online decision-making task where participants made binary choices between alternatives offering either guaranteed low outcomes or potentially better outcomes that were associated with some uncertainty. Outcomes were either hypothetical monetary gains of varying magnitudes or levels of improvement in a hypothetical medical condition. We recruited 429 online participants and repeated the survey in two waves, which allowed us to compare the between-domain attitude consistency with within-domain consistency over time. We found that uncertainty attitudes were moderately correlated across domains and time. We discuss the implications and applicability of our paradigm to broader contexts with non-quantifiable outcomes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9627026e2e8b4b15b46dccd2a113a64d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2045-2322 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Scientific Reports |
| spelling | doaj-art-9627026e2e8b4b15b46dccd2a113a64d2025-01-26T12:28:16ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111210.1038/s41598-025-87644-xModerate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisionsOhad Dan0Chelsea Y. Xu1Ruonan Jia2Emily K. Wertheimer3Megha Chawla4Galit Fuhrmann Alpert5Terri Fried6Ifat Levy7Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of MedicineDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of MedicineAbstract Uncertainty lies at the heart of everyday choices, affecting both decisions about precise quantities and those with less tangible, more qualitative, outcomes. Previous literature on decisions under uncertainty focused on alternatives with quantifiable outcomes, for example monetary lotteries. In such scenarios, decision-makers make decisions based on success chance, outcome magnitude, and individual preferences for uncertainty. It is not clear, however, how individuals construct subjective values when outcomes are not directly quantifiable. To explore how decision-makers choose between non-quantifiable uncertain outcomes, we focus here on medical decisions with qualitative outcomes. Specifically, we ask whether decision-makers exhibit similar attitudes towards uncertainty, focusing on ambiguity, across domains with quantitative and qualitative outcomes. We designed an online decision-making task where participants made binary choices between alternatives offering either guaranteed low outcomes or potentially better outcomes that were associated with some uncertainty. Outcomes were either hypothetical monetary gains of varying magnitudes or levels of improvement in a hypothetical medical condition. We recruited 429 online participants and repeated the survey in two waves, which allowed us to compare the between-domain attitude consistency with within-domain consistency over time. We found that uncertainty attitudes were moderately correlated across domains and time. We discuss the implications and applicability of our paradigm to broader contexts with non-quantifiable outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87644-xDecision-makingRisk and ambiguityMedical decisionsQualitative outcomes |
| spellingShingle | Ohad Dan Chelsea Y. Xu Ruonan Jia Emily K. Wertheimer Megha Chawla Galit Fuhrmann Alpert Terri Fried Ifat Levy Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions Scientific Reports Decision-making Risk and ambiguity Medical decisions Qualitative outcomes |
| title | Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| title_full | Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| title_fullStr | Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| title_short | Moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| title_sort | moderate stability of risk and ambiguity attitudes across quantitative and qualitative decisions |
| topic | Decision-making Risk and ambiguity Medical decisions Qualitative outcomes |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87644-x |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ohaddan moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT chelseayxu moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT ruonanjia moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT emilykwertheimer moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT meghachawla moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT galitfuhrmannalpert moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT terrifried moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions AT ifatlevy moderatestabilityofriskandambiguityattitudesacrossquantitativeandqualitativedecisions |