Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

Current guidelines favor the radial approach for coronary angiography. Therefore, specialty radial diagnostic catheters were designed to engage both coronary arteries with a single device. However, it is unclear if single catheters are superior to conventional catheters. A retrospective analysis was...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Vorpahl, Till Koehler, Jason Foerst, Spyridon Panagiotopoulos, Heinrich Schleiting, Klaus Koss, Gunda Ziegler, Hilmar Brinkmann, Melchior Seyfarth, Klaus Tiroch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Cardiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/862156
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552240040116224
author Marc Vorpahl
Till Koehler
Jason Foerst
Spyridon Panagiotopoulos
Heinrich Schleiting
Klaus Koss
Gunda Ziegler
Hilmar Brinkmann
Melchior Seyfarth
Klaus Tiroch
author_facet Marc Vorpahl
Till Koehler
Jason Foerst
Spyridon Panagiotopoulos
Heinrich Schleiting
Klaus Koss
Gunda Ziegler
Hilmar Brinkmann
Melchior Seyfarth
Klaus Tiroch
author_sort Marc Vorpahl
collection DOAJ
description Current guidelines favor the radial approach for coronary angiography. Therefore, specialty radial diagnostic catheters were designed to engage both coronary arteries with a single device. However, it is unclear if single catheters are superior to conventional catheters. A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive right radial coronary angiographies to determine catheter use, fluoroscopy time, radiation dosage, and consumption of contrast. Procedures were performed with a single TIG catheter or conventional catheters (CONV). Procedures with coronary artery bypass grafts or ventricular angiographies were excluded. 273 transradial procedures were performed successfully. 95 procedures were performed with CONV and 178 procedures with a TIG. Crossover to additional catheters was higher in TIG (15.2%) compared to CONV (5.3%, p=0.02). Fluoroscopy time was comparable between CONV and TIG, without crossover (2.2±1.2 min versus 2.3±1.2 min; n.s.), however, greater in the case of crossover for CONV (5.8±0.7) and TIG (7.6±3.0; p=0.0001). Radiation dosage was similar in CONV and the TIG, without crossover (1419±1075, cGy∗cm2 versus 1690±1138; n.s.), however, greater for CONV (2374±620) and TIG (3733±2281, p=0.05) with crossover. Overall, the amount of contrast was greater in TIG (56±13 mL) versus CONV (48±3 mL; p=0.0003). CONV femoral catheters may be the primary choice for radial approach.
format Article
id doaj-art-95bbc55b9a4a4a9daf9bc8b0db68d7f2
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-8016
2090-0597
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cardiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-95bbc55b9a4a4a9daf9bc8b0db68d7f22025-02-03T05:59:13ZengWileyCardiology Research and Practice2090-80162090-05972015-01-01201510.1155/2015/862156862156Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary AngiographyMarc Vorpahl0Till Koehler1Jason Foerst2Spyridon Panagiotopoulos3Heinrich Schleiting4Klaus Koss5Gunda Ziegler6Hilmar Brinkmann7Melchior Seyfarth8Klaus Tiroch9Department of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyVirginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USADepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyDepartment of Cardiology, HELIOS Klinikum Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, 42117 Wuppertal, GermanyCurrent guidelines favor the radial approach for coronary angiography. Therefore, specialty radial diagnostic catheters were designed to engage both coronary arteries with a single device. However, it is unclear if single catheters are superior to conventional catheters. A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive right radial coronary angiographies to determine catheter use, fluoroscopy time, radiation dosage, and consumption of contrast. Procedures were performed with a single TIG catheter or conventional catheters (CONV). Procedures with coronary artery bypass grafts or ventricular angiographies were excluded. 273 transradial procedures were performed successfully. 95 procedures were performed with CONV and 178 procedures with a TIG. Crossover to additional catheters was higher in TIG (15.2%) compared to CONV (5.3%, p=0.02). Fluoroscopy time was comparable between CONV and TIG, without crossover (2.2±1.2 min versus 2.3±1.2 min; n.s.), however, greater in the case of crossover for CONV (5.8±0.7) and TIG (7.6±3.0; p=0.0001). Radiation dosage was similar in CONV and the TIG, without crossover (1419±1075, cGy∗cm2 versus 1690±1138; n.s.), however, greater for CONV (2374±620) and TIG (3733±2281, p=0.05) with crossover. Overall, the amount of contrast was greater in TIG (56±13 mL) versus CONV (48±3 mL; p=0.0003). CONV femoral catheters may be the primary choice for radial approach.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/862156
spellingShingle Marc Vorpahl
Till Koehler
Jason Foerst
Spyridon Panagiotopoulos
Heinrich Schleiting
Klaus Koss
Gunda Ziegler
Hilmar Brinkmann
Melchior Seyfarth
Klaus Tiroch
Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
Cardiology Research and Practice
title Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_full Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_fullStr Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_short Single Center Retrospective Analysis of Conventional and Radial TIG Catheters for Transradial Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_sort single center retrospective analysis of conventional and radial tig catheters for transradial diagnostic coronary angiography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/862156
work_keys_str_mv AT marcvorpahl singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT tillkoehler singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT jasonfoerst singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT spyridonpanagiotopoulos singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT heinrichschleiting singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT klauskoss singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT gundaziegler singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT hilmarbrinkmann singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT melchiorseyfarth singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT klaustiroch singlecenterretrospectiveanalysisofconventionalandradialtigcathetersfortransradialdiagnosticcoronaryangiography