Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess

Understanding the effects of in-situ drying–wetting pattern on the stress-dependent water retention curve of intact loess is vital for addressing geotechnical problems in loess regions. The principal objective of this study is to investigate the influence of in-situ drying–wetting on the stress-depe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: X. M. Li, S. J. Di, L. Shi, Y. Zhang, P. Huang, Q. Y. Mu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2994986
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832546547553796096
author X. M. Li
S. J. Di
L. Shi
Y. Zhang
P. Huang
Q. Y. Mu
author_facet X. M. Li
S. J. Di
L. Shi
Y. Zhang
P. Huang
Q. Y. Mu
author_sort X. M. Li
collection DOAJ
description Understanding the effects of in-situ drying–wetting pattern on the stress-dependent water retention curve of intact loess is vital for addressing geotechnical problems in loess regions. The principal objective of this study is to investigate the influence of in-situ drying–wetting on the stress-dependent water retention behavior of intact loess. To meet this objective, six drying–wetting tests were carried out using a suction- and stress-controlled pressure plate extractor. Intact loess was sampled from three different depths: 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 m. For specimens from each depth, two vertical net stresses (i.e., 0 and 50 kPa) were applied prior to the drying–wetting cycle. Experimental results revealed that the in-situ drying–wetting pattern greatly affected various aspects of the water retention behavior, particularly the hysteresis. The hysteresis of the specimen from 5.0 m is about 82% and 77% larger than that of the specimens from 1.0 and 3.0 m, respectively. This is because the specimen from 5.0 m has some large-size pores (i.e., >400 μm), which were not found in specimens from 1.0 and 3.0 m. These large-size pores enhance pore nonuniformity and hence the hysteresis. Furthermore, specimens from different depths consistently showed a reduction of hysteresis when the stress was increased from 0 to 50 kPa. The reduction is the most significant for a specimen from 5.0 m due to the collapse of large-size pores under compression.
format Article
id doaj-art-94d6f3dc7f924ace90fd90468d824626
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-94d6f3dc7f924ace90fd90468d8246262025-02-03T06:48:32ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80942023-01-01202310.1155/2023/2994986Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact LoessX. M. Li0S. J. Di1L. Shi2Y. Zhang3P. Huang4Q. Y. Mu5Xi’an Siyuan UniversityNorthwest Engineering Corporation LimitedNorthwest Engineering Corporation LimitedNorthwest Engineering Corporation LimitedNorthwest Engineering Corporation LimitedDepartment of Civil EngineeringUnderstanding the effects of in-situ drying–wetting pattern on the stress-dependent water retention curve of intact loess is vital for addressing geotechnical problems in loess regions. The principal objective of this study is to investigate the influence of in-situ drying–wetting on the stress-dependent water retention behavior of intact loess. To meet this objective, six drying–wetting tests were carried out using a suction- and stress-controlled pressure plate extractor. Intact loess was sampled from three different depths: 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 m. For specimens from each depth, two vertical net stresses (i.e., 0 and 50 kPa) were applied prior to the drying–wetting cycle. Experimental results revealed that the in-situ drying–wetting pattern greatly affected various aspects of the water retention behavior, particularly the hysteresis. The hysteresis of the specimen from 5.0 m is about 82% and 77% larger than that of the specimens from 1.0 and 3.0 m, respectively. This is because the specimen from 5.0 m has some large-size pores (i.e., >400 μm), which were not found in specimens from 1.0 and 3.0 m. These large-size pores enhance pore nonuniformity and hence the hysteresis. Furthermore, specimens from different depths consistently showed a reduction of hysteresis when the stress was increased from 0 to 50 kPa. The reduction is the most significant for a specimen from 5.0 m due to the collapse of large-size pores under compression.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2994986
spellingShingle X. M. Li
S. J. Di
L. Shi
Y. Zhang
P. Huang
Q. Y. Mu
Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
title_full Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
title_fullStr Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
title_full_unstemmed Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
title_short Effects of In-Situ Drying–Wetting Cycles on the Stress-Dependent Water Retention Behavior of Intact Loess
title_sort effects of in situ drying wetting cycles on the stress dependent water retention behavior of intact loess
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2994986
work_keys_str_mv AT xmli effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess
AT sjdi effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess
AT lshi effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess
AT yzhang effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess
AT phuang effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess
AT qymu effectsofinsitudryingwettingcyclesonthestressdependentwaterretentionbehaviorofintactloess