Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire

Abstract Background Undergraduate engineering students report increased rates of mental health distress. Evidence suggests that these students experience high stress, which can perpetuate mental health challenges. Further, engineering students may engage in help-seeking and self-care activities more...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph F. Mirabelli, Eileen M. Johnson, Sara R. Vohra, Jeanne L. Sanders, Karin J. Jensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2025-03-01
Series:International Journal of STEM Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00540-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849392433015554048
author Joseph F. Mirabelli
Eileen M. Johnson
Sara R. Vohra
Jeanne L. Sanders
Karin J. Jensen
author_facet Joseph F. Mirabelli
Eileen M. Johnson
Sara R. Vohra
Jeanne L. Sanders
Karin J. Jensen
author_sort Joseph F. Mirabelli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Undergraduate engineering students report increased rates of mental health distress. Evidence suggests that these students experience high stress, which can perpetuate mental health challenges. Further, engineering students may engage in help-seeking and self-care activities more rarely than students in other disciplines. We hypothesize the existence of a culture of high stress that is normalized and expected by undergraduate engineering students. We leveraged interviews previously conducted by our team to develop two survey measures: (1) the Engineering Stress Culture (ESC) Scale, which measures cultural norms and expectations surrounding stress, and (2) the Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire (U-ESQ), which measures factors that contribute to undergraduate engineering student stress experiences (stressors). Results We developed a novel, exploratory battery of items to measure students’ experiences with stress in undergraduate engineering education. After administering the new 81-item survey (N = 624) comprising both the U-ESQ and ESC Scale, we performed exploratory factor analysis and tested the internal consistency for each factor subscale. We then refined the survey to 58 items and administered it to a second sample of participants (N = 561) at a second institution for confirmatory factor analyses. We present evidence that the ESC Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring an engineering stress culture. The final factor structure of the U-ESQ revealed eight distinct factors, each representing different stressors such as competition or identity-related experiences. We provide validity evidence for the U-ESQ. While the confirmatory evidence of the reliability of the U-ESQ instrument is less robust compared to the ESC Scale, there is acceptable evidence of reliability. This may be partially attributed to the inclusion of career-related and faculty-interaction-related stressors that may become more for salient later-stage undergraduate students, who are undersampled in our results. Conclusions We present validity and reliability evidence for the developed measures that quantify engineering student stressors and the associated high-stress culture. These measures may apply to students in other non-engineering STEM disciplines, warranting future investigations. The developed measure is a first step towards identifying and dismantling a culture of stress in engineering, which will promote student well-being and thriving.
format Article
id doaj-art-9439d92f368c47d6a9e3f13cb2941a0f
institution Kabale University
issn 2196-7822
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of STEM Education
spelling doaj-art-9439d92f368c47d6a9e3f13cb2941a0f2025-08-20T03:40:47ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of STEM Education2196-78222025-03-0112112410.1186/s40594-025-00540-8Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors QuestionnaireJoseph F. Mirabelli0Eileen M. Johnson1Sara R. Vohra2Jeanne L. Sanders3Karin J. Jensen4Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann ArborDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann ArborDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann ArborDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann ArborDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Ann ArborAbstract Background Undergraduate engineering students report increased rates of mental health distress. Evidence suggests that these students experience high stress, which can perpetuate mental health challenges. Further, engineering students may engage in help-seeking and self-care activities more rarely than students in other disciplines. We hypothesize the existence of a culture of high stress that is normalized and expected by undergraduate engineering students. We leveraged interviews previously conducted by our team to develop two survey measures: (1) the Engineering Stress Culture (ESC) Scale, which measures cultural norms and expectations surrounding stress, and (2) the Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire (U-ESQ), which measures factors that contribute to undergraduate engineering student stress experiences (stressors). Results We developed a novel, exploratory battery of items to measure students’ experiences with stress in undergraduate engineering education. After administering the new 81-item survey (N = 624) comprising both the U-ESQ and ESC Scale, we performed exploratory factor analysis and tested the internal consistency for each factor subscale. We then refined the survey to 58 items and administered it to a second sample of participants (N = 561) at a second institution for confirmatory factor analyses. We present evidence that the ESC Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring an engineering stress culture. The final factor structure of the U-ESQ revealed eight distinct factors, each representing different stressors such as competition or identity-related experiences. We provide validity evidence for the U-ESQ. While the confirmatory evidence of the reliability of the U-ESQ instrument is less robust compared to the ESC Scale, there is acceptable evidence of reliability. This may be partially attributed to the inclusion of career-related and faculty-interaction-related stressors that may become more for salient later-stage undergraduate students, who are undersampled in our results. Conclusions We present validity and reliability evidence for the developed measures that quantify engineering student stressors and the associated high-stress culture. These measures may apply to students in other non-engineering STEM disciplines, warranting future investigations. The developed measure is a first step towards identifying and dismantling a culture of stress in engineering, which will promote student well-being and thriving.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00540-8StressInstitutional cultureEngineeringMental healthSurveyFactor analysis
spellingShingle Joseph F. Mirabelli
Eileen M. Johnson
Sara R. Vohra
Jeanne L. Sanders
Karin J. Jensen
Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
International Journal of STEM Education
Stress
Institutional culture
Engineering
Mental health
Survey
Factor analysis
title Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
title_full Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
title_fullStr Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
title_short Stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture: development of the Engineering Stress Culture Scale and Undergraduate Engineering Stressors Questionnaire
title_sort stressors and normalized stress in undergraduate engineering education culture development of the engineering stress culture scale and undergraduate engineering stressors questionnaire
topic Stress
Institutional culture
Engineering
Mental health
Survey
Factor analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00540-8
work_keys_str_mv AT josephfmirabelli stressorsandnormalizedstressinundergraduateengineeringeducationculturedevelopmentoftheengineeringstressculturescaleandundergraduateengineeringstressorsquestionnaire
AT eileenmjohnson stressorsandnormalizedstressinundergraduateengineeringeducationculturedevelopmentoftheengineeringstressculturescaleandundergraduateengineeringstressorsquestionnaire
AT sararvohra stressorsandnormalizedstressinundergraduateengineeringeducationculturedevelopmentoftheengineeringstressculturescaleandundergraduateengineeringstressorsquestionnaire
AT jeannelsanders stressorsandnormalizedstressinundergraduateengineeringeducationculturedevelopmentoftheengineeringstressculturescaleandundergraduateengineeringstressorsquestionnaire
AT karinjjensen stressorsandnormalizedstressinundergraduateengineeringeducationculturedevelopmentoftheengineeringstressculturescaleandundergraduateengineeringstressorsquestionnaire