Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study

ABSTRACT Background and Aims The 6‐min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6‐min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xujin Chen, Bingxin Xu, Bingni Wei, Lin Ji, Cheng Yang, Qiang Zhan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:JGH Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70095
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583607458201600
author Xujin Chen
Bingxin Xu
Bingni Wei
Lin Ji
Cheng Yang
Qiang Zhan
author_facet Xujin Chen
Bingxin Xu
Bingni Wei
Lin Ji
Cheng Yang
Qiang Zhan
author_sort Xujin Chen
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background and Aims The 6‐min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6‐min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differences with the withdrawal time in different colon segments. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments. Methods Outpatients, age range 18–75 years, undertaking complete colonoscopy were enrolled in this study from November 2019 to November 2020 in the digestive endoscopy center. The entire colon was divided into four different segments: ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon. The respective withdrawal time and ADR in each colon segment were recorded respectively. Results A total of 586 outpatients (279 males, 307 females) enrolled in this study and the general ADR was 38.2%. The positive withdrawal time (adenomas detected) was longer than negative withdrawal time (non‐adenomas detected) (334.04 ± 24.21 s vs. 303.65 ± 5.20 s, t = 1.26, p < 0.001). ADR in ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon were respectively 30.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 7.5%. While all of their positive withdrawal time were longer than negative withdrawal time (94.34 ± 33.76 s vs. 70.40 ± 41.84 s, t = 3.31, p = 0.001; 85.40 ± 49.76 s vs. 71.66 ± 36.87 s, t = 1.95, p = 0.025; 80.29 ± 39.85 s vs. 69.73 ± 35.96 s, t = 1.40, p = 0.016;100.95 ± 55.92 s vs. 80.96 ± 42.87 s, t = 3.61; p < 0.001, respectively). The withdrawal time threshold in the ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectosigmoid colon determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 77, 61, 56 and 109 s, respectively. In the ascending colon, ADR was significantly higher (47.0% vs. 33.1%, p < 0.001) when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥ 77 s. When the withdrawal time was ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (42.7% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.013), ≥ 59 s in the descending colon (42.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in rectosigmoid colon (52.2% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.001), ADR was also significantly higher. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, Logistic regression analysis showed that withdrawal time ≥ 77 s in the ascending colon (OR, 1.796; 95% CI, 1.273–2.532; p < 0.001), ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (OR, 1.535; 95% CI, 1.094–2.155; p = 0.013), ≥ 56 s in the descending colon (OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.193–2.486; p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in the rectosigmoid colon (OR, 2.134; 95% CI, 1.446–2.350; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of ADR. Conclusions ADR and withdrawal time are all various in individual colon segments. During the operation of colonoscopy, withdrawal time in the ascending colon may be shortened appropriately. The adenomas in the rectosigmoid colon are more likely to be detected and do not take longer withdrawal times. We need to choose the appropriate time according to different colon segments.
format Article
id doaj-art-93ab0f30dc224294b66cc0bba2dfedaf
institution Kabale University
issn 2397-9070
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JGH Open
spelling doaj-art-93ab0f30dc224294b66cc0bba2dfedaf2025-01-28T09:24:32ZengWileyJGH Open2397-90702025-01-0191n/an/a10.1002/jgh3.70095Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center StudyXujin Chen0Bingxin Xu1Bingni Wei2Lin Ji3Cheng Yang4Qiang Zhan5Department of Gastroenterology The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Digestive Endoscopy Center The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University Wuxi Jiangsu ChinaABSTRACT Background and Aims The 6‐min withdrawal time for colonoscopy is widely considered the standard of care. However, there may not be appropriate if the 6‐min is equally divided into various colon segments. Since the adenoma detection in each colon segment is not the same, there may be differences with the withdrawal time in different colon segments. Our objective was to evaluate the relationships between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments. Methods Outpatients, age range 18–75 years, undertaking complete colonoscopy were enrolled in this study from November 2019 to November 2020 in the digestive endoscopy center. The entire colon was divided into four different segments: ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon. The respective withdrawal time and ADR in each colon segment were recorded respectively. Results A total of 586 outpatients (279 males, 307 females) enrolled in this study and the general ADR was 38.2%. The positive withdrawal time (adenomas detected) was longer than negative withdrawal time (non‐adenomas detected) (334.04 ± 24.21 s vs. 303.65 ± 5.20 s, t = 1.26, p < 0.001). ADR in ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon and rectosigmoid colon were respectively 30.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 7.5%. While all of their positive withdrawal time were longer than negative withdrawal time (94.34 ± 33.76 s vs. 70.40 ± 41.84 s, t = 3.31, p = 0.001; 85.40 ± 49.76 s vs. 71.66 ± 36.87 s, t = 1.95, p = 0.025; 80.29 ± 39.85 s vs. 69.73 ± 35.96 s, t = 1.40, p = 0.016;100.95 ± 55.92 s vs. 80.96 ± 42.87 s, t = 3.61; p < 0.001, respectively). The withdrawal time threshold in the ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, rectosigmoid colon determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 77, 61, 56 and 109 s, respectively. In the ascending colon, ADR was significantly higher (47.0% vs. 33.1%, p < 0.001) when the colonoscopy withdrawal time was ≥ 77 s. When the withdrawal time was ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (42.7% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.013), ≥ 59 s in the descending colon (42.3% vs. 29.9%, p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in rectosigmoid colon (52.2% vs. 33.9%, p < 0.001), ADR was also significantly higher. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, Logistic regression analysis showed that withdrawal time ≥ 77 s in the ascending colon (OR, 1.796; 95% CI, 1.273–2.532; p < 0.001), ≥ 61 s in the transverse colon (OR, 1.535; 95% CI, 1.094–2.155; p = 0.013), ≥ 56 s in the descending colon (OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.193–2.486; p = 0.004) and ≥ 109 s in the rectosigmoid colon (OR, 2.134; 95% CI, 1.446–2.350; p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the increase of ADR. Conclusions ADR and withdrawal time are all various in individual colon segments. During the operation of colonoscopy, withdrawal time in the ascending colon may be shortened appropriately. The adenomas in the rectosigmoid colon are more likely to be detected and do not take longer withdrawal times. We need to choose the appropriate time according to different colon segments.https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70095colonoscopyexperienced endoscopistsindividual colonic segmentswithdrawal time
spellingShingle Xujin Chen
Bingxin Xu
Bingni Wei
Lin Ji
Cheng Yang
Qiang Zhan
Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
JGH Open
colonoscopy
experienced endoscopists
individual colonic segments
withdrawal time
title Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
title_full Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
title_fullStr Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
title_short Relationship Between Adenoma Detection Rate and Respective Withdrawal Time in Different Colon Segments: A Retrospective, Single‐Center Study
title_sort relationship between adenoma detection rate and respective withdrawal time in different colon segments a retrospective single center study
topic colonoscopy
experienced endoscopists
individual colonic segments
withdrawal time
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70095
work_keys_str_mv AT xujinchen relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT bingxinxu relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT bingniwei relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT linji relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT chengyang relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy
AT qiangzhan relationshipbetweenadenomadetectionrateandrespectivewithdrawaltimeindifferentcolonsegmentsaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy