Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate ocular surface temperature (OST) in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging. There were 16 participants (32 eyes) in the control group, 22 participants (44 eyes) in the moderate and low post-COVID-19 fever group (M &am...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunbo Wu, Baicheng Li, Yuanshen Huang, Banglian Xu, Songlin Zhuang, Zhensheng Gu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86407-y
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585790975115264
author Chunbo Wu
Baicheng Li
Yuanshen Huang
Banglian Xu
Songlin Zhuang
Zhensheng Gu
author_facet Chunbo Wu
Baicheng Li
Yuanshen Huang
Banglian Xu
Songlin Zhuang
Zhensheng Gu
author_sort Chunbo Wu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study aimed to evaluate ocular surface temperature (OST) in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging. There were 16 participants (32 eyes) in the control group, 22 participants (44 eyes) in the moderate and low post-COVID-19 fever group (M & L fever group), and 18 participants (36 eyes) in the high post-COVID-19 fever group (H fever group). All participants underwent an ophthalmic slit lamp examination and ocular thermography. Among the control group, M & L fever group and H fever group, there were no significant differences in the upper eyelid temperature (UET), inner canthus temperature (ICT), outer canthus temperature (OCT), initial central corneal temperature (initial CCT), third-second central corneal temperature (3s-CCT), or sixth-second central corneal temperature (6s-CCT). However, the change in central corneal temperature measured within 1, 3, and 6 s (change in CCT within 1, 3, and 6 s) of the H fever group were significantly greater than those of the control group (0.15 ± 0.12 °C vs. 0.08 ± 0.09 °C, p = 0.007; 0.30 ± 0.22 °C vs. 0.17 ± 0.17 °C, p = 0.005; 0.45 ± 0.30 °C vs. 0.26 ± 0.23 °C, p = 0.004, respectively) and M & L fever group (0.15 ± 0.12 °C vs. 0.08 ± 0.08 °C, p = 0.008; 0.30 ± 0.22 °C vs. 0.16 ± 0.14 °C, p = 0.001; 0.45 ± 0.30 °C vs. 0.23 ± 0.20 °C, p < 0.001, respectively). To further investigate the relationship between OST and post-COVID-19 fever, we compared the OST of long recovery time (5 days < recovery time < 14 days; 9 patients, 18 eyes) and short recovery time (recovery time ≤ 5 days; 9 patients, 18 eyes) in the H fever group. We found that the 6s-CCT in the short recovery time group was significantly lower than that in the long recovery time group (32.43 ± 1.09 °C vs.33.10 ± 0.82 °C, p = 0.044). Additionally, the change in CCT within 1 s, 3 s, and 6 s in the short recovery time group were all significantly greater than those in the long recovery time group (0.19 ± 0.13 °C vs. 0.11 ± 0.10 °C, p = 0.048; 0.38 ± 0.24 °C vs. 0.22 ± 0.17 °C, p = 0.026; 0.58 ± 0.31 °C vs. 0.32 ± 0.24 °C, p = 0.016, respectively). In conclusion, the central corneal temperature (CCT) of patients who have an insufficient recovery time from COVID-19 infection or who exhibit severe infection symptoms could decrease faster when the eyes open. This may be due to dry eye disease.
format Article
id doaj-art-937fbcfb860c4cb584cb5c5d23897ee8
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-937fbcfb860c4cb584cb5c5d23897ee82025-01-26T12:30:14ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111210.1038/s41598-025-86407-yEvaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imagingChunbo Wu0Baicheng Li1Yuanshen Huang2Banglian Xu3Songlin Zhuang4Zhensheng Gu5School of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologySchool of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologySchool of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologySchool of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologySchool of Optical Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityAbstract This study aimed to evaluate ocular surface temperature (OST) in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging. There were 16 participants (32 eyes) in the control group, 22 participants (44 eyes) in the moderate and low post-COVID-19 fever group (M & L fever group), and 18 participants (36 eyes) in the high post-COVID-19 fever group (H fever group). All participants underwent an ophthalmic slit lamp examination and ocular thermography. Among the control group, M & L fever group and H fever group, there were no significant differences in the upper eyelid temperature (UET), inner canthus temperature (ICT), outer canthus temperature (OCT), initial central corneal temperature (initial CCT), third-second central corneal temperature (3s-CCT), or sixth-second central corneal temperature (6s-CCT). However, the change in central corneal temperature measured within 1, 3, and 6 s (change in CCT within 1, 3, and 6 s) of the H fever group were significantly greater than those of the control group (0.15 ± 0.12 °C vs. 0.08 ± 0.09 °C, p = 0.007; 0.30 ± 0.22 °C vs. 0.17 ± 0.17 °C, p = 0.005; 0.45 ± 0.30 °C vs. 0.26 ± 0.23 °C, p = 0.004, respectively) and M & L fever group (0.15 ± 0.12 °C vs. 0.08 ± 0.08 °C, p = 0.008; 0.30 ± 0.22 °C vs. 0.16 ± 0.14 °C, p = 0.001; 0.45 ± 0.30 °C vs. 0.23 ± 0.20 °C, p < 0.001, respectively). To further investigate the relationship between OST and post-COVID-19 fever, we compared the OST of long recovery time (5 days < recovery time < 14 days; 9 patients, 18 eyes) and short recovery time (recovery time ≤ 5 days; 9 patients, 18 eyes) in the H fever group. We found that the 6s-CCT in the short recovery time group was significantly lower than that in the long recovery time group (32.43 ± 1.09 °C vs.33.10 ± 0.82 °C, p = 0.044). Additionally, the change in CCT within 1 s, 3 s, and 6 s in the short recovery time group were all significantly greater than those in the long recovery time group (0.19 ± 0.13 °C vs. 0.11 ± 0.10 °C, p = 0.048; 0.38 ± 0.24 °C vs. 0.22 ± 0.17 °C, p = 0.026; 0.58 ± 0.31 °C vs. 0.32 ± 0.24 °C, p = 0.016, respectively). In conclusion, the central corneal temperature (CCT) of patients who have an insufficient recovery time from COVID-19 infection or who exhibit severe infection symptoms could decrease faster when the eyes open. This may be due to dry eye disease.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86407-yCOVID-19Ocular surface temperatureDry eye diseaseEvaporative dry eyeOcular thermographyInfrared thermal imaging
spellingShingle Chunbo Wu
Baicheng Li
Yuanshen Huang
Banglian Xu
Songlin Zhuang
Zhensheng Gu
Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
Scientific Reports
COVID-19
Ocular surface temperature
Dry eye disease
Evaporative dry eye
Ocular thermography
Infrared thermal imaging
title Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
title_full Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
title_fullStr Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
title_short Evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post-COVID-19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
title_sort evaluation of ocular surface temperature in post covid 19 patients with different degrees of fever via infrared thermal imaging
topic COVID-19
Ocular surface temperature
Dry eye disease
Evaporative dry eye
Ocular thermography
Infrared thermal imaging
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86407-y
work_keys_str_mv AT chunbowu evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging
AT baichengli evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging
AT yuanshenhuang evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging
AT banglianxu evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging
AT songlinzhuang evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging
AT zhenshenggu evaluationofocularsurfacetemperatureinpostcovid19patientswithdifferentdegreesoffeverviainfraredthermalimaging