Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
Objective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Prostate Cancer |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832558814067425280 |
---|---|
author | Francis Ting Pim J. Van Leeuwen James Thompson Ron Shnier Daniel Moses Warick Delprado Phillip D. Stricker |
author_facet | Francis Ting Pim J. Van Leeuwen James Thompson Ron Shnier Daniel Moses Warick Delprado Phillip D. Stricker |
author_sort | Francis Ting |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoing MRI/US-TBx at our institution were included for analysis. Patients underwent MRI/US-TBx of suspicious lesions detected on multiparametric MRI +/- simultaneous TTMB. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing simultaneous MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. Primary outcome was PCa detection. Significant PCa was defined as ≥Gleason score (GS) 3+4=7 PCa. McNemar’s test was used to compare detection rates between MRI/US-TBx and the combined biopsy strategy. Results. 148 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx and 80 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. In the MRI/US-TBx versus combined biopsy strategy subgroup analysis (n=80), there were 55 PCa and 38 significant PCa. The detection rate for the combined biopsy strategy versus MRI/US-TBx for significant PCa was 49% versus 40% (p=0.02) and for insignificant PCa was 20% versus 10% (p=0.04), respectively. Eleven cases (14%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on MRI/US-TBx and 7 cases (8.7%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on TTMB. Conclusions. A combined biopsy approach (MRI/US-TBx + TTMB) detects more significant PCa than MRI/US-TBx alone; however, it will double the detection rate of insignificant PCa. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-93093fa3797e47f0a3f761f0cddb45b3 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-3111 2090-312X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Prostate Cancer |
spelling | doaj-art-93093fa3797e47f0a3f761f0cddb45b32025-02-03T01:31:36ZengWileyProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/37947383794738Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate BiopsyFrancis Ting0Pim J. Van Leeuwen1James Thompson2Ron Shnier3Daniel Moses4Warick Delprado5Phillip D. Stricker6St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSouthern Radiology, Randwick, NSW 2031, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, AustraliaDouglas Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaObjective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoing MRI/US-TBx at our institution were included for analysis. Patients underwent MRI/US-TBx of suspicious lesions detected on multiparametric MRI +/- simultaneous TTMB. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing simultaneous MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. Primary outcome was PCa detection. Significant PCa was defined as ≥Gleason score (GS) 3+4=7 PCa. McNemar’s test was used to compare detection rates between MRI/US-TBx and the combined biopsy strategy. Results. 148 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx and 80 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. In the MRI/US-TBx versus combined biopsy strategy subgroup analysis (n=80), there were 55 PCa and 38 significant PCa. The detection rate for the combined biopsy strategy versus MRI/US-TBx for significant PCa was 49% versus 40% (p=0.02) and for insignificant PCa was 20% versus 10% (p=0.04), respectively. Eleven cases (14%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on MRI/US-TBx and 7 cases (8.7%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on TTMB. Conclusions. A combined biopsy approach (MRI/US-TBx + TTMB) detects more significant PCa than MRI/US-TBx alone; however, it will double the detection rate of insignificant PCa.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738 |
spellingShingle | Francis Ting Pim J. Van Leeuwen James Thompson Ron Shnier Daniel Moses Warick Delprado Phillip D. Stricker Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy Prostate Cancer |
title | Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy |
title_full | Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy |
title_fullStr | Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy |
title_short | Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy |
title_sort | assessment of the performance of magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy against a combined targeted plus systematic biopsy approach using 24 core transperineal template saturation mapping prostate biopsy |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francisting assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT pimjvanleeuwen assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT jamesthompson assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT ronshnier assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT danielmoses assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT warickdelprado assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy AT phillipdstricker assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy |