Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy

Objective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francis Ting, Pim J. Van Leeuwen, James Thompson, Ron Shnier, Daniel Moses, Warick Delprado, Phillip D. Stricker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016-01-01
Series:Prostate Cancer
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832558814067425280
author Francis Ting
Pim J. Van Leeuwen
James Thompson
Ron Shnier
Daniel Moses
Warick Delprado
Phillip D. Stricker
author_facet Francis Ting
Pim J. Van Leeuwen
James Thompson
Ron Shnier
Daniel Moses
Warick Delprado
Phillip D. Stricker
author_sort Francis Ting
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoing MRI/US-TBx at our institution were included for analysis. Patients underwent MRI/US-TBx of suspicious lesions detected on multiparametric MRI +/- simultaneous TTMB. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing simultaneous MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. Primary outcome was PCa detection. Significant PCa was defined as ≥Gleason score (GS) 3+4=7 PCa. McNemar’s test was used to compare detection rates between MRI/US-TBx and the combined biopsy strategy. Results. 148 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx and 80 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. In the MRI/US-TBx versus combined biopsy strategy subgroup analysis (n=80), there were 55 PCa and 38 significant PCa. The detection rate for the combined biopsy strategy versus MRI/US-TBx for significant PCa was 49% versus 40% (p=0.02) and for insignificant PCa was 20% versus 10% (p=0.04), respectively. Eleven cases (14%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on MRI/US-TBx and 7 cases (8.7%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on TTMB. Conclusions. A combined biopsy approach (MRI/US-TBx + TTMB) detects more significant PCa than MRI/US-TBx alone; however, it will double the detection rate of insignificant PCa.
format Article
id doaj-art-93093fa3797e47f0a3f761f0cddb45b3
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3111
2090-312X
language English
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Prostate Cancer
spelling doaj-art-93093fa3797e47f0a3f761f0cddb45b32025-02-03T01:31:36ZengWileyProstate Cancer2090-31112090-312X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/37947383794738Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate BiopsyFrancis Ting0Pim J. Van Leeuwen1James Thompson2Ron Shnier3Daniel Moses4Warick Delprado5Phillip D. Stricker6St. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaSouthern Radiology, Randwick, NSW 2031, AustraliaSchool of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, AustraliaDouglas Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW 2113, AustraliaSt. Vincent’s Prostate Cancer Centre, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, AustraliaObjective. To compare the performance of multiparametric resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI/US-TBx) to a combined biopsy strategy (MRI/US-TBx plus 24-core transperineal template saturation mapping biopsy (TTMB)). Methods. Between May 2012 and October 2015, all patients undergoing MRI/US-TBx at our institution were included for analysis. Patients underwent MRI/US-TBx of suspicious lesions detected on multiparametric MRI +/- simultaneous TTMB. Subgroup analysis was performed on patients undergoing simultaneous MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. Primary outcome was PCa detection. Significant PCa was defined as ≥Gleason score (GS) 3+4=7 PCa. McNemar’s test was used to compare detection rates between MRI/US-TBx and the combined biopsy strategy. Results. 148 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx and 80 patients underwent MRI/US-TBx + TTMB. In the MRI/US-TBx versus combined biopsy strategy subgroup analysis (n=80), there were 55 PCa and 38 significant PCa. The detection rate for the combined biopsy strategy versus MRI/US-TBx for significant PCa was 49% versus 40% (p=0.02) and for insignificant PCa was 20% versus 10% (p=0.04), respectively. Eleven cases (14%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on MRI/US-TBx and 7 cases (8.7%) of significant PCa were detected exclusively on TTMB. Conclusions. A combined biopsy approach (MRI/US-TBx + TTMB) detects more significant PCa than MRI/US-TBx alone; however, it will double the detection rate of insignificant PCa.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738
spellingShingle Francis Ting
Pim J. Van Leeuwen
James Thompson
Ron Shnier
Daniel Moses
Warick Delprado
Phillip D. Stricker
Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
title Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
title_full Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
title_fullStr Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
title_short Assessment of the Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy against a Combined Targeted Plus Systematic Biopsy Approach Using 24-Core Transperineal Template Saturation Mapping Prostate Biopsy
title_sort assessment of the performance of magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy against a combined targeted plus systematic biopsy approach using 24 core transperineal template saturation mapping prostate biopsy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3794738
work_keys_str_mv AT francisting assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT pimjvanleeuwen assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT jamesthompson assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT ronshnier assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT danielmoses assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT warickdelprado assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy
AT phillipdstricker assessmentoftheperformanceofmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundfusionguidedprostatebiopsyagainstacombinedtargetedplussystematicbiopsyapproachusing24coretransperinealtemplatesaturationmappingprostatebiopsy