Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle
Actually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille
2011-07-01
|
| Series: | Projets de Paysage |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832096014017757184 |
|---|---|
| author | Élise Geisler Théa Manola |
| author_facet | Élise Geisler Théa Manola |
| author_sort | Élise Geisler |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Actually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields of the research and the founding works on the mono-sensory landscapes concerning the other senses that the sight. This article presents the first results of a crossed analysis, in terms of methodological contributions, of three research works : a research led within the framework of the Pirve financed by the Puca and CNRS, and phd researches of E. Geisler and of T. Manola. These three researches adopt a sensitive approach of the landscape with similar methods (interviews, commented courses, sound journal/multisensory bag). For the precise case of the sustainable neighborhood of Kronsberg in Hanover, we are going to try to present the state of progress of our works concerning the methodological part and to determine the contributions and the complementarities of the various methods, as well as the difficulties met for each of them. We shall also compare both, almost identical protocols (applied on one hand to the sound and on the other hand to the multisensory) and shall try to see the advantages of the one and the other one. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-92ee468d9c794709b76961d4d5eb79fb |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1969-6124 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2011-07-01 |
| publisher | Agrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP Lille |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Projets de Paysage |
| spelling | doaj-art-92ee468d9c794709b76961d4d5eb79fb2025-02-05T16:21:03ZfraAgrocampus Angers, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage, ENP Blois, ENSAP Bordeaux, ENSAP LilleProjets de Paysage1969-61242011-07-01610.4000/paysage.17868Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielleÉlise GeislerThéa ManolaActually, in the plentiful scientific production on the landscape question, but also in the speeches of the landscape architects, the multisensoriality of the landscape is considered as acquired. However, almost no specific check was made by research works, in spite of the invitations in the fields of the research and the founding works on the mono-sensory landscapes concerning the other senses that the sight. This article presents the first results of a crossed analysis, in terms of methodological contributions, of three research works : a research led within the framework of the Pirve financed by the Puca and CNRS, and phd researches of E. Geisler and of T. Manola. These three researches adopt a sensitive approach of the landscape with similar methods (interviews, commented courses, sound journal/multisensory bag). For the precise case of the sustainable neighborhood of Kronsberg in Hanover, we are going to try to present the state of progress of our works concerning the methodological part and to determine the contributions and the complementarities of the various methods, as well as the difficulties met for each of them. We shall also compare both, almost identical protocols (applied on one hand to the sound and on the other hand to the multisensory) and shall try to see the advantages of the one and the other one.https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868soundscapedaily landscapesustainable neighborhoodmultisensory landscapeinhabitants perceptions |
| spellingShingle | Élise Geisler Théa Manola Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle Projets de Paysage soundscape daily landscape sustainable neighborhood multisensory landscape inhabitants perceptions |
| title | Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| title_full | Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| title_fullStr | Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| title_short | Les paysages de Kronsberg à Hanovre : approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| title_sort | les paysages de kronsberg a hanovre approches sonore et multisensorielle |
| topic | soundscape daily landscape sustainable neighborhood multisensory landscape inhabitants perceptions |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/paysage/17868 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elisegeisler lespaysagesdekronsbergahanovreapprochessonoreetmultisensorielle AT theamanola lespaysagesdekronsbergahanovreapprochessonoreetmultisensorielle |