Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section

Background. The behaviour of isobaric levobupivacaine in relation to gravity when used in obstetric spinal anesthesia is unclear. Methods. 46 women with ASA physical status 1 undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Spinal anesthesia with 12.5 mg levobupivacaine was performed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabio Gori, Francesco Corradetti, Vittorio Cerotto, Vito Aldo Peduto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/212696
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556905453584384
author Fabio Gori
Francesco Corradetti
Vittorio Cerotto
Vito Aldo Peduto
author_facet Fabio Gori
Francesco Corradetti
Vittorio Cerotto
Vito Aldo Peduto
author_sort Fabio Gori
collection DOAJ
description Background. The behaviour of isobaric levobupivacaine in relation to gravity when used in obstetric spinal anesthesia is unclear. Methods. 46 women with ASA physical status 1 undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Spinal anesthesia with 12.5 mg levobupivacaine was performed in the sitting position in all women. Those in the first group were placed in the supine position immediately after the injection, while those in the second group were asked to remain seated for 2 minutes before assuming the supine position. The sensory block level, the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the regression of the sensory block for 2 dermatomes of the sensory block, the first request for analgesics, and the regression of motor block were recorded. Results. No differences in onset times, sensory level, or Bromage score were observed between the two groups. The time of first analgesic request was earlier in the seated group (supine 131±42 min, seated 106±29 min, 𝑃=.02). Conclusion. Isobaric levobupivacaine in women at term produces a subarachnoid block the dermatomal level of which does not depend on gravitational forces.
format Article
id doaj-art-92e102f1294849e9b8f9d09103d93f0a
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-92e102f1294849e9b8f9d09103d93f0a2025-02-03T05:44:06ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702010-01-01201010.1155/2010/212696212696Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean SectionFabio Gori0Francesco Corradetti1Vittorio Cerotto2Vito Aldo Peduto3Section of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, ItalySection of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, ItalySection of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, ItalySection of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Perugia, 06100 Perugia, ItalyBackground. The behaviour of isobaric levobupivacaine in relation to gravity when used in obstetric spinal anesthesia is unclear. Methods. 46 women with ASA physical status 1 undergoing cesarean section were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Spinal anesthesia with 12.5 mg levobupivacaine was performed in the sitting position in all women. Those in the first group were placed in the supine position immediately after the injection, while those in the second group were asked to remain seated for 2 minutes before assuming the supine position. The sensory block level, the onset of sensory and motor blocks, the regression of the sensory block for 2 dermatomes of the sensory block, the first request for analgesics, and the regression of motor block were recorded. Results. No differences in onset times, sensory level, or Bromage score were observed between the two groups. The time of first analgesic request was earlier in the seated group (supine 131±42 min, seated 106±29 min, 𝑃=.02). Conclusion. Isobaric levobupivacaine in women at term produces a subarachnoid block the dermatomal level of which does not depend on gravitational forces.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/212696
spellingShingle Fabio Gori
Francesco Corradetti
Vittorio Cerotto
Vito Aldo Peduto
Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
title_full Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
title_fullStr Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
title_short Influence of Positioning on Plain Levobupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Cesarean Section
title_sort influence of positioning on plain levobupivacaine spinal anesthesia in cesarean section
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/212696
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiogori influenceofpositioningonplainlevobupivacainespinalanesthesiaincesareansection
AT francescocorradetti influenceofpositioningonplainlevobupivacainespinalanesthesiaincesareansection
AT vittoriocerotto influenceofpositioningonplainlevobupivacainespinalanesthesiaincesareansection
AT vitoaldopeduto influenceofpositioningonplainlevobupivacainespinalanesthesiaincesareansection