Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort

Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Conti Fabrizio, Ceccarelli Fulvia, Perricone Carlo, Massaro Laura, Marocchi Elisa, Miranda Francesca, Spinelli Francesca Romana, Truglia Simona, Alessandri Cristiano, Valesini Guido
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Mediators of Inflammation
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549319027195904
author Conti Fabrizio
Ceccarelli Fulvia
Perricone Carlo
Massaro Laura
Marocchi Elisa
Miranda Francesca
Spinelli Francesca Romana
Truglia Simona
Alessandri Cristiano
Valesini Guido
author_facet Conti Fabrizio
Ceccarelli Fulvia
Perricone Carlo
Massaro Laura
Marocchi Elisa
Miranda Francesca
Spinelli Francesca Romana
Truglia Simona
Alessandri Cristiano
Valesini Guido
author_sort Conti Fabrizio
collection DOAJ
description Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P=0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P<0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P=0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P=0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity.
format Article
id doaj-art-926b7c88cb4b48d09e07c4f03cebba31
institution Kabale University
issn 0962-9351
1466-1861
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Mediators of Inflammation
spelling doaj-art-926b7c88cb4b48d09e07c4f03cebba312025-02-03T06:11:40ZengWileyMediators of Inflammation0962-93511466-18612015-01-01201510.1155/2015/328078328078Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric CohortConti Fabrizio0Ceccarelli Fulvia1Perricone Carlo2Massaro Laura3Marocchi Elisa4Miranda Francesca5Spinelli Francesca Romana6Truglia Simona7Alessandri Cristiano8Valesini Guido9Lupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyObjectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P=0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P<0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P=0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P=0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078
spellingShingle Conti Fabrizio
Ceccarelli Fulvia
Perricone Carlo
Massaro Laura
Marocchi Elisa
Miranda Francesca
Spinelli Francesca Romana
Truglia Simona
Alessandri Cristiano
Valesini Guido
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
Mediators of Inflammation
title Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
title_full Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
title_fullStr Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
title_full_unstemmed Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
title_short Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
title_sort systemic lupus erythematosus with and without anti dsdna antibodies analysis from a large monocentric cohort
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078
work_keys_str_mv AT contifabrizio systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT ceccarellifulvia systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT perriconecarlo systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT massarolaura systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT marocchielisa systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT mirandafrancesca systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT spinellifrancescaromana systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT trugliasimona systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT alessandricristiano systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort
AT valesiniguido systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort