Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort
Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Mediators of Inflammation |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832549319027195904 |
---|---|
author | Conti Fabrizio Ceccarelli Fulvia Perricone Carlo Massaro Laura Marocchi Elisa Miranda Francesca Spinelli Francesca Romana Truglia Simona Alessandri Cristiano Valesini Guido |
author_facet | Conti Fabrizio Ceccarelli Fulvia Perricone Carlo Massaro Laura Marocchi Elisa Miranda Francesca Spinelli Francesca Romana Truglia Simona Alessandri Cristiano Valesini Guido |
author_sort | Conti Fabrizio |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P=0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P<0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P=0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P=0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-926b7c88cb4b48d09e07c4f03cebba31 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0962-9351 1466-1861 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Mediators of Inflammation |
spelling | doaj-art-926b7c88cb4b48d09e07c4f03cebba312025-02-03T06:11:40ZengWileyMediators of Inflammation0962-93511466-18612015-01-01201510.1155/2015/328078328078Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric CohortConti Fabrizio0Ceccarelli Fulvia1Perricone Carlo2Massaro Laura3Marocchi Elisa4Miranda Francesca5Spinelli Francesca Romana6Truglia Simona7Alessandri Cristiano8Valesini Guido9Lupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyLupus Clinic, Reumatologia, Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Specialità Mediche, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00161, ItalyObjectives. The anti-dsDNA antibodies are a marker for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and 70–98% of patients test positive. We evaluated the demographic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutical features of a monocentric SLE cohort according to the anti-dsDNA status. Methods. We identified three groups: anti-dsDNA + (persistent positivity); anti-dsDNA ± (initial positivity and subsequent negativity during disease course); anti-dsDNA − (persistent negativity). Disease activity was assessed by the European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM). Results. We evaluated 393 patients (anti-dsDNA +: 62.3%; anti-dsDNA ±: 13.3%; anti-dsDNA −: 24.4%). The renal involvement was significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA + (30.2%), compared with anti-dsDNA ± and anti-dsDNA − (21.1% and 18.7%, resp.; P=0.001). Serositis resulted significantly more frequent in anti-dsDNA − (82.3%) compared to anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (20.8% and 13.4%, resp.; P<0.0001). The reduction of C4 serum levels was identified significantly more frequently in anti-dsDNA + and anti-dsDNA ± (40.0% and 44.2%, resp.) compared with anti-dsDNA − (21.8%, P=0.005). We did not identify significant differences in the mean ECLAM values before and after modification of anti-dsDNA status (P=0.7). Conclusion. Anti-dsDNA status influences the clinical and immunological features of SLE patients. Nonetheless, it does not appear to affect disease activity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 |
spellingShingle | Conti Fabrizio Ceccarelli Fulvia Perricone Carlo Massaro Laura Marocchi Elisa Miranda Francesca Spinelli Francesca Romana Truglia Simona Alessandri Cristiano Valesini Guido Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort Mediators of Inflammation |
title | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_full | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_fullStr | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_short | Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with and without Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Analysis from a Large Monocentric Cohort |
title_sort | systemic lupus erythematosus with and without anti dsdna antibodies analysis from a large monocentric cohort |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/328078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT contifabrizio systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT ceccarellifulvia systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT perriconecarlo systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT massarolaura systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT marocchielisa systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT mirandafrancesca systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT spinellifrancescaromana systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT trugliasimona systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT alessandricristiano systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort AT valesiniguido systemiclupuserythematosuswithandwithoutantidsdnaantibodiesanalysisfromalargemonocentriccohort |