Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017

Abstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lutz Schneider
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Sciendo 2020-10-01
Series:Wirtschaftsdienst
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574176029835264
author Lutz Schneider
author_facet Lutz Schneider
author_sort Lutz Schneider
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The performed regression confirms that regions that were characterised by a high share of manufacturing workers in the 1930s and that experience a sharp decline in industrial employment today show significantly better election results for the AfD.
format Article
id doaj-art-9235077613ad45bc87fc2efecb2f3ea0
institution Kabale University
issn 0043-6275
1613-978X
language deu
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Wirtschaftsdienst
spelling doaj-art-9235077613ad45bc87fc2efecb2f3ea02025-02-02T00:29:07ZdeuSciendoWirtschaftsdienst0043-62751613-978X2020-10-011001078779210.1007/s10273-020-2764-6Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017Lutz Schneider0Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften CoburgAbstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The performed regression confirms that regions that were characterised by a high share of manufacturing workers in the 1930s and that experience a sharp decline in industrial employment today show significantly better election results for the AfD.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6
spellingShingle Lutz Schneider
Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
Wirtschaftsdienst
title Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
title_full Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
title_fullStr Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
title_full_unstemmed Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
title_short Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
title_sort deindustrialisation and voting behaviour a regional analysis of the german federal election of 2017
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lutzschneider deindustrialisationandvotingbehaviouraregionalanalysisofthegermanfederalelectionof2017