Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017
Abstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Sciendo
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Wirtschaftsdienst |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832574176029835264 |
---|---|
author | Lutz Schneider |
author_facet | Lutz Schneider |
author_sort | Lutz Schneider |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The performed regression confirms that regions that were characterised by a high share of manufacturing workers in the 1930s and that experience a sharp decline in industrial employment today show significantly better election results for the AfD. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-9235077613ad45bc87fc2efecb2f3ea0 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0043-6275 1613-978X |
language | deu |
publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | Article |
series | Wirtschaftsdienst |
spelling | doaj-art-9235077613ad45bc87fc2efecb2f3ea02025-02-02T00:29:07ZdeuSciendoWirtschaftsdienst0043-62751613-978X2020-10-011001078779210.1007/s10273-020-2764-6Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017Lutz Schneider0Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften CoburgAbstract In this contribution, the political success of the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) in the German federal election of 2017 is explained by the adverse effect of shrinking manufacturing employment. The employment effect is particularly strong in regions with vital industrial traditions. The performed regression confirms that regions that were characterised by a high share of manufacturing workers in the 1930s and that experience a sharp decline in industrial employment today show significantly better election results for the AfD.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6 |
spellingShingle | Lutz Schneider Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 Wirtschaftsdienst |
title | Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 |
title_full | Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 |
title_fullStr | Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 |
title_short | Deindustrialisation and Voting Behaviour: A Regional Analysis of the German Federal Election of 2017 |
title_sort | deindustrialisation and voting behaviour a regional analysis of the german federal election of 2017 |
url | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2764-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lutzschneider deindustrialisationandvotingbehaviouraregionalanalysisofthegermanfederalelectionof2017 |