The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages
ABSTRACT Stream periphyton is an ideal study system for explaining how dispersal shapes community patterns. Few studies have tried to investigate periphyton metacommunities at the reach scale, and studies comparing local versus upstream periphyton propagule sources are lacking. We aimed to address t...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70850 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832582962082742272 |
|---|---|
| author | Daniel Zamorano Travis Ingram Christoph D. Matthaei |
| author_facet | Daniel Zamorano Travis Ingram Christoph D. Matthaei |
| author_sort | Daniel Zamorano |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Stream periphyton is an ideal study system for explaining how dispersal shapes community patterns. Few studies have tried to investigate periphyton metacommunities at the reach scale, and studies comparing local versus upstream periphyton propagule sources are lacking. We aimed to address these knowledge gaps by disentangling environmental constraints and dispersal sources, including dispersal hypotheses related to periphyton functional guilds. We covered 25‐m sections of streambed with plastic silage cover sheets in three streams in Southern New Zealand, allowing river water to flow over the sheets. Samples on top of these sheets allowed periphyton colonisation only by drifting upstream propagules, while ‘control’ samples placed directly upstream of the plastic sheets were colonised by local and upstream propagules. We collected samples after 7, 14, and 25 days of colonisation. Response variables included periphyton biomass, community structure, and relative abundances of functional guilds. Control samples showed 1.5–6 times higher cell densities than plastic‐cover samples, suggesting that local colonisation is very important for biomass accrual. Periphyton communities on both tile types became more similar to each other with time, indicating that environmental filters overcame effects of colonisation sources. While motile and flagellated taxa showed the ability to reach their preferred microhabitats in all streams, the responses of the remaining functional guilds did not follow the expected patterns. We conclude that periphyton community assembly strongly depends on reach‐scale connectivity, which results in higher biomass accrual and community structure. These findings suggest that the mass effect paradigm is likely to be the principal metacommunity process shaping stream periphyton communities at the reach scale. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-9229bd7ddc61402e96928b4d47cb3e2b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2045-7758 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj-art-9229bd7ddc61402e96928b4d47cb3e2b2025-01-29T05:08:42ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582025-01-01151n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70850The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity AssemblagesDaniel Zamorano0Travis Ingram1Christoph D. Matthaei2Department of Zoology University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandDepartment of Zoology University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandDepartment of Zoology University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandABSTRACT Stream periphyton is an ideal study system for explaining how dispersal shapes community patterns. Few studies have tried to investigate periphyton metacommunities at the reach scale, and studies comparing local versus upstream periphyton propagule sources are lacking. We aimed to address these knowledge gaps by disentangling environmental constraints and dispersal sources, including dispersal hypotheses related to periphyton functional guilds. We covered 25‐m sections of streambed with plastic silage cover sheets in three streams in Southern New Zealand, allowing river water to flow over the sheets. Samples on top of these sheets allowed periphyton colonisation only by drifting upstream propagules, while ‘control’ samples placed directly upstream of the plastic sheets were colonised by local and upstream propagules. We collected samples after 7, 14, and 25 days of colonisation. Response variables included periphyton biomass, community structure, and relative abundances of functional guilds. Control samples showed 1.5–6 times higher cell densities than plastic‐cover samples, suggesting that local colonisation is very important for biomass accrual. Periphyton communities on both tile types became more similar to each other with time, indicating that environmental filters overcame effects of colonisation sources. While motile and flagellated taxa showed the ability to reach their preferred microhabitats in all streams, the responses of the remaining functional guilds did not follow the expected patterns. We conclude that periphyton community assembly strongly depends on reach‐scale connectivity, which results in higher biomass accrual and community structure. These findings suggest that the mass effect paradigm is likely to be the principal metacommunity process shaping stream periphyton communities at the reach scale.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70850dispersal processesdrift communityfield experimentfunctional guildsmass effectNew Zealand |
| spellingShingle | Daniel Zamorano Travis Ingram Christoph D. Matthaei The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages Ecology and Evolution dispersal processes drift community field experiment functional guilds mass effect New Zealand |
| title | The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages |
| title_full | The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages |
| title_fullStr | The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages |
| title_short | The Role of Local and Upstream Colonisation in Determining Stream Periphyton Metacommunity Assemblages |
| title_sort | role of local and upstream colonisation in determining stream periphyton metacommunity assemblages |
| topic | dispersal processes drift community field experiment functional guilds mass effect New Zealand |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70850 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT danielzamorano theroleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages AT travisingram theroleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages AT christophdmatthaei theroleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages AT danielzamorano roleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages AT travisingram roleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages AT christophdmatthaei roleoflocalandupstreamcolonisationindeterminingstreamperiphytonmetacommunityassemblages |