Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Background It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical ef...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huankun Li, Hangsheng Bao, Zhidong Yang, Baijun Hu, Yaocheng Pan, Yi Wang, Jiayi Chen, Hongjun Chen, Bisheng Shen, Yonggen Zou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-02-01
Series:Orthopaedic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14311
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832557714504417280
author Huankun Li
Hangsheng Bao
Zhidong Yang
Baijun Hu
Yaocheng Pan
Yi Wang
Jiayi Chen
Hongjun Chen
Bisheng Shen
Yonggen Zou
author_facet Huankun Li
Hangsheng Bao
Zhidong Yang
Baijun Hu
Yaocheng Pan
Yi Wang
Jiayi Chen
Hongjun Chen
Bisheng Shen
Yonggen Zou
author_sort Huankun Li
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RTSA in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases and further determine whether it is necessary to expand the indications of RTSA. Method We conducted a systematic search of studies published between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The experimental group included patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), while the control group consisted of patients who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty (HA) or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA). The minimum follow‐up period was 1 year, and a random‐effects model was utilized for data synthesis. Results A total of 45 studies were included in the meta‐analysis. Compare to HA, RTSA showed significant advantages in postoperative ASES scores (p = 0.004), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), and abduction (p < 0.0001). Compare to ATSA, RTSA showed significantly lower postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.004), ASES scores (p = 0.001), SST scores (p < 0.0001), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.011), internal rotation (p < 0.0001), and external rotation (p < 0.0001). Further meta regression analysis was conducted, considering factors such as region, age, gender ratio, and follow‐up time, excluding the influence of relevant factors. Overall, RTSA did not demonstrate advantages in postoperative functional scores and range of motion. In terms of complication and revision rates, RTSA had lower rates compared to HA and ATSA, except for the complication rate, where there was no significant difference between RTSA and ATSA (p = 0.521), but statistically significant differences were observed in other measures. Conclusion RTSA demonstrates better clinical efficacy compared to HA but is inferior to ATSA. It can be considered for expanding treatment options for elderly patients with 3 or 4‐part proximal humeral fractures, but it is not suitable for treating end‐stage shoulder arthritis and humeral head necrosis. Overall, the decision to use RTSA should be carefully evaluated based on the extent of the patient's rotator cuff injury.
format Article
id doaj-art-91a2a1b7c8f646b49e0fc012e324dbc2
institution Kabale University
issn 1757-7853
1757-7861
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Orthopaedic Surgery
spelling doaj-art-91a2a1b7c8f646b49e0fc012e324dbc22025-02-03T03:10:59ZengWileyOrthopaedic Surgery1757-78531757-78612025-02-0117231333210.1111/os.14311Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisHuankun Li0Hangsheng Bao1Zhidong Yang2Baijun Hu3Yaocheng Pan4Yi Wang5Jiayi Chen6Hongjun Chen7Bisheng Shen8Yonggen Zou9The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Zhongshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Zhongshan ChinaZhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Zhongshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaThe Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine Foshan ChinaABSTRACT Background It is still unclear whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has advantages over traditional hemiarthroplasty (HA) and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of RTSA in the treatment of complex shoulder joint diseases and further determine whether it is necessary to expand the indications of RTSA. Method We conducted a systematic search of studies published between January 1, 2012 and May 31, 2023 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The experimental group included patients who underwent primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), while the control group consisted of patients who underwent primary hemiarthroplasty (HA) or anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA). The minimum follow‐up period was 1 year, and a random‐effects model was utilized for data synthesis. Results A total of 45 studies were included in the meta‐analysis. Compare to HA, RTSA showed significant advantages in postoperative ASES scores (p = 0.004), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), and abduction (p < 0.0001). Compare to ATSA, RTSA showed significantly lower postoperative Constant scores (p = 0.004), ASES scores (p = 0.001), SST scores (p < 0.0001), forward flexion (p < 0.0001), abduction (p = 0.011), internal rotation (p < 0.0001), and external rotation (p < 0.0001). Further meta regression analysis was conducted, considering factors such as region, age, gender ratio, and follow‐up time, excluding the influence of relevant factors. Overall, RTSA did not demonstrate advantages in postoperative functional scores and range of motion. In terms of complication and revision rates, RTSA had lower rates compared to HA and ATSA, except for the complication rate, where there was no significant difference between RTSA and ATSA (p = 0.521), but statistically significant differences were observed in other measures. Conclusion RTSA demonstrates better clinical efficacy compared to HA but is inferior to ATSA. It can be considered for expanding treatment options for elderly patients with 3 or 4‐part proximal humeral fractures, but it is not suitable for treating end‐stage shoulder arthritis and humeral head necrosis. Overall, the decision to use RTSA should be carefully evaluated based on the extent of the patient's rotator cuff injury.https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14311anatomical total shoulder arthroplastyhemi‐arthroplastyindicationsmeta‐analysisreverse shoulder arthroplasty
spellingShingle Huankun Li
Hangsheng Bao
Zhidong Yang
Baijun Hu
Yaocheng Pan
Yi Wang
Jiayi Chen
Hongjun Chen
Bisheng Shen
Yonggen Zou
Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Orthopaedic Surgery
anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty
hemi‐arthroplasty
indications
meta‐analysis
reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort whether the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty should continue to be expanded a systematic review and meta analysis
topic anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty
hemi‐arthroplasty
indications
meta‐analysis
reverse shoulder arthroplasty
url https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14311
work_keys_str_mv AT huankunli whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hangshengbao whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhidongyang whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baijunhu whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaochengpan whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yiwang whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiayichen whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongjunchen whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bishengshen whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yonggenzou whethertheindicationsforreverseshoulderarthroplastyshouldcontinuetobeexpandedasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis