Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context
Summary: Background: Sampling the air in indoor congregate settings, where respiratory pathogens are ubiquitous, may constitute a valuable yet underutilised data source for community-wide surveillance of respiratory infections. However, there is a lack of research comparing air sampling and individ...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | EBioMedicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396424005486 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832576492443271168 |
|---|---|
| author | Caspar Geenen Steven Traets Sarah Gorissen Michiel Happaerts Kurt Beuselinck Lies Laenen Jens Swinnen Sien Ombelet Joren Raymenants Els Keyaerts Emmanuel André |
| author_facet | Caspar Geenen Steven Traets Sarah Gorissen Michiel Happaerts Kurt Beuselinck Lies Laenen Jens Swinnen Sien Ombelet Joren Raymenants Els Keyaerts Emmanuel André |
| author_sort | Caspar Geenen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Summary: Background: Sampling the air in indoor congregate settings, where respiratory pathogens are ubiquitous, may constitute a valuable yet underutilised data source for community-wide surveillance of respiratory infections. However, there is a lack of research comparing air sampling and individual sampling of attendees. Therefore, it remains unclear how air sampling results should be interpreted for the purpose of surveillance. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we compared the presence and concentration of several respiratory pathogens in the air with the number of attendees with infections and the pathogen load in their nasal mucus. Weekly for 22 consecutive weeks, we sampled the air in a single childcare setting in Belgium. Concurrently, we collected the paper tissues used to wipe the noses of 23 regular attendees: children aged zero to three and childcare workers. All samples were tested for 29 respiratory pathogens using PCR. Findings: Air sampling sensitively detected most respiratory pathogens found in nasal mucus. Some pathogens (SARS-CoV-2, Pneumocystis jirovecii) were found repeatedly in the air, but rarely in nasal mucus, whilst the opposite was true for others (Human coronavirus NL63). All three pathogens with a clear outbreak pattern (Human coronavirus HKU-1, human parainfluenza virus 3 and 4) were found in the air one week before or concurrent with the first detection in paper tissue samples. The presence and concentration of pathogens in the air was best predicted by the pathogen load of the most infectious case. However, air pathogen concentrations also correlated with the number of attendees with infections. Detection and concentration in the air were associated with CO2 concentration, a marker of ventilation and occupancy. Interpretation: Our results suggest that air sampling could provide sensitive, responsive epidemiological indicators for the surveillance of respiratory pathogens. Using air CO2 concentrations to normalise such signals emerges as a promising approach. Funding: KU Leuven; DURABLE project, under the EU4Health Programme of the European Commission; Thermo Fisher Scientific. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-918f889b9355459389acdcc9dea56eae |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2352-3964 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | EBioMedicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-918f889b9355459389acdcc9dea56eae2025-01-31T05:11:52ZengElsevierEBioMedicine2352-39642025-02-01112105512Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in contextCaspar Geenen0Steven Traets1Sarah Gorissen2Michiel Happaerts3Kurt Beuselinck4Lies Laenen5Jens Swinnen6Sien Ombelet7Joren Raymenants8Els Keyaerts9Emmanuel André10KU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Corresponding author.KU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, General Internal Medicine, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, General Internal Medicine, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumKU Leuven, Dept. of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Laboratory Medicine and National Reference Centre for Respiratory Pathogens, Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, BelgiumSummary: Background: Sampling the air in indoor congregate settings, where respiratory pathogens are ubiquitous, may constitute a valuable yet underutilised data source for community-wide surveillance of respiratory infections. However, there is a lack of research comparing air sampling and individual sampling of attendees. Therefore, it remains unclear how air sampling results should be interpreted for the purpose of surveillance. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we compared the presence and concentration of several respiratory pathogens in the air with the number of attendees with infections and the pathogen load in their nasal mucus. Weekly for 22 consecutive weeks, we sampled the air in a single childcare setting in Belgium. Concurrently, we collected the paper tissues used to wipe the noses of 23 regular attendees: children aged zero to three and childcare workers. All samples were tested for 29 respiratory pathogens using PCR. Findings: Air sampling sensitively detected most respiratory pathogens found in nasal mucus. Some pathogens (SARS-CoV-2, Pneumocystis jirovecii) were found repeatedly in the air, but rarely in nasal mucus, whilst the opposite was true for others (Human coronavirus NL63). All three pathogens with a clear outbreak pattern (Human coronavirus HKU-1, human parainfluenza virus 3 and 4) were found in the air one week before or concurrent with the first detection in paper tissue samples. The presence and concentration of pathogens in the air was best predicted by the pathogen load of the most infectious case. However, air pathogen concentrations also correlated with the number of attendees with infections. Detection and concentration in the air were associated with CO2 concentration, a marker of ventilation and occupancy. Interpretation: Our results suggest that air sampling could provide sensitive, responsive epidemiological indicators for the surveillance of respiratory pathogens. Using air CO2 concentrations to normalise such signals emerges as a promising approach. Funding: KU Leuven; DURABLE project, under the EU4Health Programme of the European Commission; Thermo Fisher Scientific.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396424005486Respiratory pathogensRespiratory virusesAir samplingDisease surveillanceAerosolIndoor air |
| spellingShingle | Caspar Geenen Steven Traets Sarah Gorissen Michiel Happaerts Kurt Beuselinck Lies Laenen Jens Swinnen Sien Ombelet Joren Raymenants Els Keyaerts Emmanuel André Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context EBioMedicine Respiratory pathogens Respiratory viruses Air sampling Disease surveillance Aerosol Indoor air |
| title | Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context |
| title_full | Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context |
| title_fullStr | Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context |
| title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context |
| title_short | Interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections: a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingResearch in context |
| title_sort | interpretation of indoor air surveillance for respiratory infections a prospective longitudinal observational study in a childcare settingresearch in context |
| topic | Respiratory pathogens Respiratory viruses Air sampling Disease surveillance Aerosol Indoor air |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352396424005486 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT caspargeenen interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT steventraets interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT sarahgorissen interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT michielhappaerts interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT kurtbeuselinck interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT lieslaenen interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT jensswinnen interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT sienombelet interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT jorenraymenants interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT elskeyaerts interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext AT emmanuelandre interpretationofindoorairsurveillanceforrespiratoryinfectionsaprospectivelongitudinalobservationalstudyinachildcaresettingresearchincontext |