Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation

Therapeutic mAbs show a specific “charge fingerprint” that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Ascione, Marcello Belfiore, Jaana Vesterinen, Mihaela Buda, Wolf Holtkamp, Francesca Luciani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:mAbs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832576559519629312
author Alessandro Ascione
Marcello Belfiore
Jaana Vesterinen
Mihaela Buda
Wolf Holtkamp
Francesca Luciani
author_facet Alessandro Ascione
Marcello Belfiore
Jaana Vesterinen
Mihaela Buda
Wolf Holtkamp
Francesca Luciani
author_sort Alessandro Ascione
collection DOAJ
description Therapeutic mAbs show a specific “charge fingerprint” that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of “horizontal standards” for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.
format Article
id doaj-art-90b4b78ca43542ea9001ea85f6de584f
institution Kabale University
issn 1942-0862
1942-0870
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series mAbs
spelling doaj-art-90b4b78ca43542ea9001ea85f6de584f2025-01-31T04:19:38ZengTaylor & Francis GroupmAbs1942-08621942-08702024-12-0116110.1080/19420862.2024.2313737Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situationAlessandro Ascione0Marcello Belfiore1Jaana Vesterinen2Mihaela Buda3Wolf Holtkamp4Francesca Luciani5National Centre for the Control and Evaluation of Medicines, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, ItalyNational Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, ItalyLaboratory Department, Finnish Medicines Agency, Helsinki, FinlandEuropean Pharmacopoeia Department, European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM), Council of Europe, Strasbourg, FranceSection IMG 3 “Product Testing of Immunological Biomedicines”, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, GermanyNational Centre for the Control and Evaluation of Medicines, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, ItalyTherapeutic mAbs show a specific “charge fingerprint” that may affect safety and efficacy, and, as such, it is often identified as a critical quality attribute (CQA). Capillary iso-electric focusing (cIEF), commonly used for the evaluation of such CQA, provides an analytical tool to investigate mAb purity and identity across the product lifecycle. Here, we discuss the results of an analysis of a panel of antibody products by conventional and whole-column imaging cIEF systems performed as part of European Pharmacopoeia activities related to development of “horizontal standards” for the quality control of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The study aimed at designing and verifying an independent and transversal cIEF procedure for the reliable analysis of mAbs charge variants. Despite the use of comparable experimental conditions, discrepancies in the charge profile and measured isoelectric points emerged between the two cIEF systems. These data suggest that the results are method-dependent rather than absolute, an aspect known to experts in the field and pharmaceutical industry, but not suitably documented in the literature. Critical implications from analytical and regulatory perspectives, are herein thoughtfully discussed, with a special focus on the context of market surveillance and identification of falsified medicines.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737Charge heterogeneity profilecIEFidentityisoelectric pointpurityquality control
spellingShingle Alessandro Ascione
Marcello Belfiore
Jaana Vesterinen
Mihaela Buda
Wolf Holtkamp
Francesca Luciani
Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
mAbs
Charge heterogeneity profile
cIEF
identity
isoelectric point
purity
quality control
title Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
title_full Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
title_fullStr Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
title_full_unstemmed Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
title_short Charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cIEF systems: views on the current situation
title_sort charge heterogeneity of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by different cief systems views on the current situation
topic Charge heterogeneity profile
cIEF
identity
isoelectric point
purity
quality control
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2313737
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandroascione chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation
AT marcellobelfiore chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation
AT jaanavesterinen chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation
AT mihaelabuda chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation
AT wolfholtkamp chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation
AT francescaluciani chargeheterogeneityoftherapeuticmonoclonalantibodiesbydifferentciefsystemsviewsonthecurrentsituation